Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine

[faithlilly]

I forgot to add Faith - that the fact that they have not been interviewed will also be turned into another crime by the McCanns because -  as every sceptic knows -  everything the McCanns have said and everything they have done since the day they were born....................................is wrong.   

Inexplicable but true.

Now stopping being silly Benice.

[Benice]

Now stopping being silly Benice.

Well only time will tell which one of us is right Faith.    We shall have to wait and see.

[Alfred R Jones]

I have given the only two scenarios possible, neither of which cover either the McCanns or Summers in glory.

Please explain why not?  If Summers and Swan chose not to interview the McCanns then that's not the McCanns' fault.  If they decided not to be interviewed by Summers and Swan, that is their prerogative and shows that they have not colluded with the authors into portraying events only from their point of view.  What does refusing an interview with an author who is writing a book about the case of your missing child, say about yourself then, in your view?

[Wonderfulspam]

Smithman is as guilty as sin.

No amount of Swann & Summers fiction novels or DCI Redwood sound bytes can change that reality.

[stephen25000]

http://portugalresident.com/more-revelations-in-the-british-media


' Anjos has penned a damning article claiming the objective of the current Scotland Yard investigation into Madeleine’s seven-year disappearance has “never been to find out what happened to Maddie”. '

Instead, he maintains, it has “always been to remove suspicions of the McCanns”.
- See more at: http://portugalresident.com/more-revelations-in-the-british-media#sthash.NrH6ancc.dpuf

[Mr Gray]

http://portugalresident.com/more-revelations-in-the-british-media


' Anjos has penned a damning article claiming the objective of the current Scotland Yard investigation into Madeleine’s seven-year disappearance has “never been to find out what happened to Maddie”. '

Instead, he maintains, it has “always been to remove suspicions of the McCanns”.
- See more at: http://portugalresident.com/more-revelations-in-the-british-media#sthash.NrH6ancc.dpuf

I think most of us realise the Portuguese resident is highly biased

[Mr Gray]

The Romanov book was as well researched as the sources allowed.

When conducting any kind of research the best results are always achieved by interviewing, if possible, the individuals closest to the the subject of the research. That's only common sense. The McCanns were of course at the centre of this particular maelstrom so it would unarguably be a priority, if your book were to have any credibility to interview them in person.

Why this did not happen we can only guess at although I would be very surprised if Summers hadn't asked for the McCanns input.

amaral didn't interview or meet the mccanns ...no excuse as they weren't dead

[stephen25000]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/508106/Madeleine-McCann-book-claims-prowler-seen-stalking-apartments?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+daily-express-uk-news+%28Daily+Express+%3A%3A+UK+Feed%29

Yet more old bollocks repeated.

[stephen25000]

I think most of us realise the Portuguese resident is highly biased

Only if your a mccann, or one of their acolytes.

[Wonderfulspam]

Swann & Summers Shite...

"Had there been a warning note in the apartment, do we think the McCanns would have left the patio door unlocked on the night they went to the other side of the pool to have dinner away from their children?

The back patio door as a point of entry/exit has long since been debunked.

If the imaginary abductor entered there, then he closed the child gate, door & curtains behind him, since Gerry didn't mention any of those things being disturbed, only the childrens bedroom door.

If the imaginary abductor left via the back door then he closed the curtains, door, child gate & gate behind him, the polite abductor.

Fantasy Land.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=WLvnfcl-Zkg#t=1370

[Alice Purjorick]

On Thursday we shall be able to download it onto our Kindles read it and form our own opinion.
It is being hyped that the authors conducted original research or words to that effect.

Re the comment in WS post; why do you people think it is excusable to do something risky just because one has not been warned not to do so?

Steam is hot, sharp edges cut, leaving doors to accommodation and cars is inviting trouble; most people do not need labels to tell them so.

[faithlilly]

On Thursday we shall be able to download it onto our Kindles read it and form our own opinion.
It is being hyped that the authors conducted original research or words to that effect.

Re the comment in WS post; why do you people think it is excusable to do something risky just because one has not been warned not to do so?

Steam is hot, sharp edges cut, leaving doors to accommodation and cars is inviting trouble; most people do not need labels to tell them so.

Indeed Alice. I blame the nanny culture we now live in. There seems to be no place for personal responsibility any more.

[Wonderfulspam]

Indeed Alice. I blame the nanny culture we now live in. There seems to be no place for personal responsibility any more.

Why accept responsibility, when you can just blame imaginary child abducting anaesthetist paedophiles & sheeple will be gullible enough to believe you.

[stephen25000]

Why accept responsibility, when you can just blame imaginary child abducting anaesthetist paedophiles & sheeple will be gullible enough to believe you.

..and that is what the mccanns and their allied press coverage hope for, gullibility.

I do wonder how many people reading the press realize that nothing even vaguely concrete has been uncovered to prove the existence of an abductor or abductors.

Then there are those who believe in the Flat Earth.

perhaps they need to be taken to the edge and dropped off . %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

[Eleanor]

Okay, Folks.  Can we go back to being relatively pleasant?  This is a much nicer place when you are.  All of you.
And I know that you can do it.