Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine

[Alfred R Jones]

"Waterloo" has been discounted from £25 to £9 on Amazon - using troll logic this must mean it's a flop. 

[Mr Gray]

The whole point is that a book which strongly supports the mccanns...rubbishes their critics ...has been written by two respected journalists...that is a fact

[stephen25000]

The whole point is that a book which strongly supports the mccanns...rubbishes their critics ...has been written by two respected journalists...that is a fact

No dave.

That is your opinion and the one trotted out by the mccann minions.

The journalists have done nothing new, just presented the some of the files in a different order.

and of course have only looked at one scenario.

So, a very boring book.

[Bert Singe]

The trolls are knocking themselves out to rubbish this book - they're obviously terrified of it.  It's quite hilarious!

As did the pro apologists with the "buried by MSM" videos. 

[Alfred R Jones]

As did the pro apologists with the "buried by MSM" videos. 

Yes but they really were shit, even most "sceptics" thought so 

[Mr Gray]

No dave.

That is your opinion and the one trotted out by the mccann minions.

The journalists have done nothing new, just presented the some of the files in a different order.

and of course have only looked at one scenario.

So, a very boring book.

A book that strongly supports the mccanns and debunks the supposed evidence against them

[misty]

So - a new DVD, another new book, neither of which I have looked at.
Would someone  be a dear & sum up all the new cluesies which have been revealed, please, or may I go back to sleep until the next Sky News bulletin?

[Bert Singe]

Yes but they really were shit, even most "sceptics" thought so 

The narrator was shit (without a doubt - bored me senseless if I'm honest) whereas the content was not. The documentary was successful in highlighting the abnormality of this case.

I haven't read the S & S book so I've no comment. It could be groundbreaking for all I know. The difference between myself and half the pro apologists on here is that I'll refrain from judging it until I've read every last word. Some pros on here were literally driven crazy by the thought of watching the videos, which is fair enough if you really didn't want to listen to the guy's boring narration, but in fairness to the general argument it's BS to comment so vociferously as some did when they hadn't even seen it!

[stephen25000]

It was the absence of evidence of abduction and the inconsistent and changing stories of the mccanns and associates that led the PJ to look at the mccanns.

There was no trace of Madeleine at all, and then the indications of the dogs reinforced their suspicions. The lack of forensic backup, has not changed the distinct possibility that Madeleine died in the apartment.

Personally, when I first saw the story, I felt sympathy, as I thought it was a genuine case of a missing child. Subsequent events and information changed my mind.

Whether you admit it or not, the mccanns have received help all the way to three different P.M.'s , and that's not counting numerous other people who have backed them, without even looking at the available information on what happened.

As to cover-ups, they happen, unless you are too blind to see them.

[stephen25000]

so Gerry would not have been struck off

Never heard of the CRB, now DBS dave ?

Very relevant in these circumstances, but you know that.

[stephen25000]

A book that strongly supports the mccanns and debunks the supposed evidence against them

Only one side of the story, and did you really expect that pair to say something other than they did, and risk the wrath of Carter-Ruck ?

If you do, you're more naive than I thought.

[Alfred R Jones]

The narrator was shit (without a doubt - bored me senseless if I'm honest) whereas the content was not. The documentary was successful in highlighting the abnormality of this case.

I haven't read the S & S book so I've no comment. It could be groundbreaking for all I know. The difference between myself and half the pro apologists on here is that I'll refrain from judging it until I've read every last word. Some [ censored word ] on here were literally driven crazy by the thought of watching the videos, which is fair enough if you really didn't want to listen to the guy's boring narration, but in fairness to the general argument it's BS to comment so vociferously as some did when they hadn't even seen it!

The most important difference between the book and the video in my view is that only the most zealous McCann [ censored word ] would have the time and energy to wade through the mire of those videos.  The book, on the other hand is accessible, very readable, and will reach a much wider audience (in one form or another). 

[stephen25000]

The most important difference between the book and the video in my view is that only the most zealous McCann [ censored word ] would have the time and energy to wade through the mire of those videos.  The book, on the other hand is accessible, very readable, and will reach a much wider audience (in one form or another).

That is a matter of opinion.

Unless of course you are a mccann supporter [ censored word ] who believes in the fairy tale of abduction.

Oh, that's you alfred. 

[Mr Gray]

Never heard of the CRB, now DBS dave ?

Very relevant in these circumstances, but you know that.

you recently posted a long posts of doctors with criminal convictions...most are still working ...DBS checks here have made no difference

[Mr Gray]

Only one side of the story, and did you really expect that pair to say something other than they did, and risk the wrath of Carter-Ruck ?

If you do, you're more naive than I thought.

it would be very easy to write a book pointing out all the evidence against the mccanns.. but not directly accusing them....and they would have sold far more copies...amaral was an arrogant fool who thought the mccanns would not sue