I have struggled to get through the first three parts and I must say Benice I cannot find fault with any of it. Maybe the final episode is the controversial bit?
PS. what misinformation are you referring to??
There are loads of examples Angelo - all of which have already been discussed on here at length in the past.
For one example the claim that Jane Tanner identified Robert Murat is gross misinformation. She did no such thing - and there is not a scrap of evidence apart from Amaral's claim in his book to say that she did.
Surely you would agree that if she had made a positive identification of Murat as the abductor, the last thing Amaral would have done would be to tell her she didn't need to make a signed statement to that effect and that she could go home. Of course he wouldn't. He would have ordered her back to the police station at the speed of light to get a written, signed statement from her about this FANTASTIC piece of evidence against the man he was about to make an Arguido. Instead he did the complete opposite.
IMO he sent her home because her failure to identify Murat was of no use to him at all. However, without a statement he could say what he liked - particularly to Murat, and just as he lied to Gerry about the 100% DNA match I believe he probably did tell Murat that JT had identified him. And Murat probably carried on thinking that was true for a long time - until someone eventually put him right.
