New documentary:"BURIED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA -The True Story of Madeleine McCann.

[Eleanor]

I have yet to watch part 3, but I will do so and also watch part 4 again as well.
You can use 'Company Check', a partially free service to check on some details. The crook Halligen is listed several timesa and with a current 'address'.

Not sure what "Company Check" is Stephen.  What does it tell you?

[stephen25000]

Not sure what "Company Check" is Stephen.  What does it tell you?

Here's the link to it.

I have used it before. 

http://companycheck.co.uk/

Just type in the name of a company or a person. It has been quite useful.

[Eleanor]

Thanks, Stephen.  I can't think of anyone at this precise moment, but I have saved it for later.

[stephen25000]

Thanks, Stephen.  I can't think of anyone at this precise moment, but I have saved it for later.

No problem.

[Benice]

I haven't read his theory on 7/7....just seen a little on his site...and a little about crop circles being the work of aliens...9/11 a government cover up...his support of those who believe Lee Rigby's death was part of a government plan...Ian Huntley being framed by the CIA.

He has no credibility...why should I waste my time watching his work.

As he believes in alien abduction - I'm surprised he didn't put that theory forward as the answer to Madeleine's disappearance.

His theory  (that a massive cover up has been in operation for years -  because the McCanns KNOW 'something' which, if  revealed, will bring down governments,)  noticeably doesn't include any reasons as to HOW or WHY an ordinary married couple with kids from Leicestershire came to be in such a massive position of power that they actually have Prime ministers,  MP's, MI5, MI6, every other government agency, the whole of the UK media and let's not forget the Masons -  to name but a few  - in the palm of their hand.

All that vast power and yet Gerry still peddles off to work every day on his pushbike.   Hardly an image of supreme power is it?    But wait - no doubt that is just another cover up so that no-one will realise that he secretly controls the country (if not the world)   

I was going to say I've never heard such an unadulterated load of rubbish, but as it happens, I have  - as  strong whiffs of Bennett and co. pervade the whole article imo.

The True Story of Madeleine??   (insert Jim Royle comment here)

[Mr Gray]

Why have SY said they are treating the case as a stranger abduction

[stephen25000]

Why have SY said they are treating the case as a stranger abduction

So are you saying it wasn't a stranger who 'abducted' Madeleine dave, i.e. someone instead known to them ??

[Mr Gray]

So are you saying it wasn't a stranger who 'abducted' Madeleine dave, i.e. someone instead known to them ??

no I think the most likely case is a stranger abduction...this video doesn't agree from what you have said...so why do you think SY are treating the case as a stranger abduction

[stephen25000]

no I think the most likely case is a stranger abduction...this video doesn't agree from what you have said...so why do you think SY are treating the case as a stranger abduction

As you know well dave, I don't believe any  abduction took place , and I have yet to see any evidence, let alone forensic evidence which indicate this to be the case.

The video, if you watched it, ends with it's author stating he doesn't know what happened to Madeleine, and that remains the state of play in Portugal.

[Mr Gray]

As you know well dave, I don't believe any  abduction took place , and I have yet to see any evidence, let alone forensic evidence which indicate this to be the case.

The video, if you watched it, ends with it's author stating he doesn't know what happened to Madeleine, and that remains the state of play in Portugal.

Then I agree with him...no one knows for certain...we can decide what is most likely on the available evidence...which is what SY have done as they search for the abductor

[Benice]

As you know well dave, I don't believe any  abduction took place , and I have yet to see any evidence, let alone forensic evidence which indicate this to be the case.

The video, if you watched it, ends with it's author stating he doesn't know what happened to Madeleine, and that remains the state of play in Portugal.

So how can he claim to be telling the true story of Madeleine if he doesn't know what the true story is?   He can't have it both ways.

[stephen25000]

So how can he claim to be telling the true story of Madeleine if he doesn't know what the true story is?   He can't have it both ways.

Perhaps you should pay attention  to the theme of the videos.

[stephen25000]

Then I agree with him...no one knows for certain...we can decide what is most likely on the available evidence...which is what SY have done as they search for the abductor

...'we can decide.....' ?

I know , benice would like this, abduction by aliens from Beta Centuari 2.

A nice 'class M' planet 4.3 light years away.

[Benice]

Perhaps you should pay attention  to the theme of the videos.

To be perfectly honest I'm not too sure what the theme is.     It just seems to be a long list of rehashed myths, misinformation, conspiracy theories, gossip,  innuendo, - sometimes laced with words lilke 'shadowy' or 'mysterious' to make perfectly normal stuff sound suspicious.
 
And why does he claim to be sick to death of newspaper articles, and then quote some newspaper articles word for word as if he believes their content is gospel?   

To be fair I have only skipped through quite a lot of this video, but IMO it's so amateurish its cringeworthy.  Although IMO he could definitely win prizes for verbosity.

Sorry Stephen - I can't take this seriously.    But if you want to - then of course -  that's your prerogative. 

[stephen25000]

To be perfectly honest I'm not too sure what the theme is.     It just seems to be a long list of rehashed myths, misinformation, conspiracy theories, gossip,  innuendo, - sometimes laced with words lilke 'shadowy' or 'mysterious' to make perfectly normal stuff sound suspicious.
 
And why does he claim to be sick to death of newspaper articles, and then quote some newspaper articles word for word as if he believes their content is gospel?   

To be fair I have only skipped through quite a lot of this video, but IMO it's so amateurish its cringeworthy.  Although IMO he could definitely win prizes for verbosity.

Sorry Stephen - I can't take this seriously.    But if you want to - then of course -  that's your prerogative.

You don't want to take it seriously, for a simple reason.

it shows what all the abduction stories in the headlines were.....

PLANTED and PURE RUBBISH.