Author Topic: New documentary:"BURIED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA -The True Story of Madeleine McCann.  (Read 182752 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
..and here's one of the  gerry mccann's Freudian Slips.

"There's no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there's no evidence to implicate us in her death"

Offline Brietta

..and here's one of the  gerry mccann's Freudian Slips.

"There's no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there's no evidence to implicate us in her death"

How on earth is that a "Freudian Slip"?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

stephen25000

  • Guest
How on earth is that a "Freudian Slip"?


''......and there's no evidence to implicate us in her death''

Offline Brietta

Utter rubbish.

Within the parameters of the conditions and the countries involved, Madeleine was searched for by many people.

It would be extremely helpful if that VERY OLD MYTH was placed where it belongs.

'Ill thought out publications'.

Has that come from the mccann camp ? >@@(*&)

Nothing has come from 'the McCann camp' whatever you imagine that is, it has come from me , some thought and an injection of common sense.

Madeleine was stolen in Portugal; how long she remained in Portugal is known only to those involved; but the lead investigator has written a book which tells us that very soon after she was taken, he came to the conclusion she was dead.

This resulted in the search for a missing little girl who might still have been in the area being turned on its head, with all available official resources concentrating on looking for evidence to implicate her parents in her disappearance.

This involved utilising the gutter press in Portugal to leak horrendous accusations aimed at Madeleine's parents; subsequently picked up by the press in the rest of the world.

In the interim the focus was removed from the perpetrator/s of this crime in the place where it happened and where it mattered most ~ Portugal.

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta


''......and there's no evidence to implicate us in her death''

" ... probably because, as he had already stated quite clearly, there was no evidence that Madeleine was dead.  If the evidence did not exist that she was dead how could it be possible there would be evidence to implicate her parents ~ and do not forget that was the accusation??

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Many people over the past seven years have expended a lot of time and energy trying to implicate Madeleine's parents in her disappearance.
The 'latest' videos merely rehashes these tired old accusations perhaps in the notion that if it is said often enough people will begin to believe it.

I think there has been an absolute panic in some quarters that the new investigation might actually reveal the truth of the matter; and that investigation most certainly is starting from the point when Madeleine was abducted by a stranger.

Obviously you know better ... but we shall see.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2014, 04:51:14 PM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline John

Apparently Kate should have done what the sceptics think she should have done  -  i.e.  ignored her lawyer's advice and done everything in her power to assist the police to pin the crime on herself.     I ask you -  what innocent person would do that -  and why do people think they know better than her lawyer - who was obviously giving advice aimed solely at preventing the PJ from framing his client? 

He was exercising his legal expertise - which Kate did not have   - and as his client she would have been mad to think she knew better  and to ignore his advice. 

What sane person willingly helps the police to pin a crime on themselves which they didn't commit?

The mind boggles at the bizarre logic of some people.

Her response to the last question says it all.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Brietta

Her response to the last question says it all.

She was astute enough to be aware that the investigation had nothing at all to do with Madeleine at that stage and all to do with the investigation into her.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Her response to the last question says it all.
she did absolutely the right thing...you know as a policeman that the pj would not have stopped at those 48 questions but would have asked another 48...and kept on going...Kate knew they hadn't got a clue and were not even looking for Maddie...by not answering she was saying charge me or leave me alone

ferryman

  • Guest
she did absolutely the right thing...you know as a policeman that the pj would not have stopped at those 48 questions but would have asked another 48...and kept on going...Kate knew they hadn't got a clue and were not even looking for Maddie...by not answering she was saying charge me or leave me alone

.by not answering she [Kate] was saying charge me or leave me alone

Yes!

And they left both Kate and Gerry alone.

Which says what, exactly? ...

Offline John

she did absolutely the right thing...you know as a policeman that the pj would not have stopped at those 48 questions but would have asked another 48...and kept on going...Kate knew they hadn't got a clue and were not even looking for Maddie...by not answering she was saying charge me or leave me alone

And being the honest upstanding person she is, she should have cooperated and answered every single question but then she had disdain for the very people charged with discovering what happened to her daughter.

Quote from: Kate McCann - 'Madeleine'
f.....g tosser   f.....g tosser
« Last Edit: August 14, 2014, 03:00:49 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Brietta

And being the honest upstanding person she is, she should have cooperated and answered every single question but then she had disdain for the very people charged with discovering what happened to her daughter.

Prescient wasn't she.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

ferryman

  • Guest
And being the honest upstanding person she is, she should have cooperated and answered every single question but then she had disdain for the very people charged with discovering what happened to her daughter.

So unreasonable of Kate to be irate with someone who double-crossed and betrayed them so cruelly ...

Offline Jean-Pierre


stephen25000

  • Guest
" ... probably because, as he had already stated quite clearly, there was no evidence that Madeleine was dead.  If the evidence did not exist that she was dead how could it be possible there would be evidence to implicate her parents ~ and do not forget that was the accusation??


Nil points on that Brietta. 8(0(*