Author Topic: New documentary:"BURIED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA -The True Story of Madeleine McCann.  (Read 182833 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Thanks for that admission.  I very much doubt that you are alone.  But you certainly didn't miss much.

His accent was a bit of a turn off for me.

Can't stand accents that are north of the M25 myself.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Any information which sheds new light on the possible involvement of the McCanns in their daughter's disappearance is a matter for the police and it is illegal to withhold such information, unless you're saying that no such information was discovered, in which case quelle surprise.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2014, 08:56:48 PM by John »

Offline Eleanor

His accent was a bit of a turn off for me.

Can't stand accents that are north of the M25 myself.

My accent is to the right of Buckingham Palace, so we ought to get on like a house on fire.

Offline Bert Singe

Any information which sheds new light on the possible involvement of the McCanns in their daughter's disappearance is a matter for the police and it is illegal to withhold such information, unless you're saying that no such information was discovered, in which case quelle surprise.

People are allowed to have doubts and suspicion based on witnessing peculiar behaviour are they not? Possessing evidence is another matter entirely.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
People are allowed to have doubts and suspicion based on witnessing peculiar behaviour are they not? Possessing evidence is another matter entirely.
Is this what was in the Oakley Report then?  What peculiar behaviour in particular did the Oakley Report highlight then?

ferryman

  • Guest
And if those same detectives produced a report which was hyper-critical of you and your friends and questioned your timelines of that night, which never saw the light of day, you'd do this because.........?

Never saw the light of day?  Let's see. The efits were produced a year after the Smiths gave their initial statements to the PJ. 

The efits were in the possession of British and Portuguese police by October 2009.

Scotland Yard chose the moment of the crimewatch programme to unveil the efits publicly.

Even if they were in a position to (which I'm far from sure they were) should the McCanns have gainsaid the police by releasing those efits before the police, even though the police had them in their possession?

 

Offline Bert Singe

Is this what was in the Oakley Report then?  What peculiar behaviour in particular did the Oakley Report highlight then?

Alfred, based on first impressions I suspect you reside on this forum to primarily antagonise posters whom hold an alternative viewpoint. Why else ask a question that cannot possibly be answered by myself? The content of the report is confidential. My input was as touched upon earlier, speculation. Am I only permitted to comment on this forum if I state fact?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Alfred, based on first impressions I suspect you reside on this forum to primarily antagonise posters whom hold an alternative viewpoint. Why else ask a question that cannot possibly be answered by myself? The content of the report is confidential. My input was as touched upon earlier, speculation. Am I only permitted to comment on this forum if I state fact?
Well I do think speculation is frowned upon so if you could stick to the facts that would probably be advisable.  One fact I do know is that the Met have the Oakley  Report in their possession and yet they still haven't arrested the McCanns - indeed they have gone so far as to rule them out as suspects.  Of course this is an inconvenient truth that "sceptics" prefer to read a double-meaning into, as is their wont. 

stephen25000

  • Guest
So has anyone got any feedback on the 'investigative' achievements of Edgar and Cowley ? &%+((£

ferryman

  • Guest
So has anyone got any feedback on the 'investigative' achievements of Edgar and Cowley ? &%+((£

The most notable achievement of the PJ investigation was to establish the innocence of the McCanns and their friends.

Alas, it made no progress in tracking down the perpetrators of crime(s) against Madeleine.

The jury is still out on the follow-up investigation.

Offline Angelo222

The most notable achievement of the PJ investigation was to establish the innocence of the McCanns and their friends.

Alas, it made no progress in tracking down the perpetrators of crime(s) against Madeleine.

The jury is still out on the follow-up investigation.

It appears from the evidence that they were put together as a team by Everest magnate Kennedy well before the Alphaig Company was formed.  My question is why bother to form a company at all?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline pegasus

It appears from the evidence that they were put together as a team by Everest magnate Kennedy well before the Alphaig Company was formed.  My question is why bother to form a company at all?
One can trace the use of this team back to at least the date of the internet domain name registration, as documented in the films. As for why form a limited company at all - I am far from expert on these things - but isn't that the normal way a serious big businessman would set up a business - as a limited company? I think it has advantages for example it limits the personal liability of the individuals (or individual singular according to the films) who own it
« Last Edit: August 20, 2014, 11:59:53 PM by pegasus »

stephen25000

  • Guest
What was the point of Alphaig/A.I.G. being set up ?

It wasn't needed when there was already a plethora of P.I. agencies, who could have dealt with the 'investigation'.

...and then of course, why was it closed down after such a short existence ?




« Last Edit: August 21, 2014, 08:16:47 AM by stephen25000 »

Offline Mr Gray

What was the point of Alphaig/A.I.G. being set up ?

It wasn't needed when there was already a plethora of P.I. agencies, who could have dealt with the 'investigation'.

...and then of course, why was it closed down after such a short existence ?

Stranger abduction is no rare that there are NO agencies who specialise in this field

stephen25000

  • Guest
Stranger abduction is no rare that there are NO agencies who specialise in this field

Poor excuse.

Do the police specialize in 'abductions' ?

Why don't you 'google' the rather extensive number of P.I. agencies, or pick up a copy of the yellow pages, and research.

People have 'disappeared' throughout history, and therefore don't tell me they haven't been investigated, that would be pure bull if you said that.