Has anyone considered why Hall introduced the speculation at the end suggesting that phone records somehow proved a meeting between Gerry and Robert when logic tells us that a meeting in a public place would be the very last thing that anyone would do had they been somehow involved? After sitting through four hours of mostly boring repetition I found this quite bizarre. Why ruin a reasonably well put together documentary by inserting something which was quite ridiculous and frankly too stupid a proposition for words? &%+((£
I agree John. There are quite few 'Bennett' thinking's going on in that Docu...
The suggestion that Mr Smith was also 'friends' with Murat was strange-thankfully Mr Smith contacted Hall and let him know.
The documentary did expose a lot of the in-consistences, and the Government involvement ( not mentioning the Brooks and Sun newspaper money spinner angle, but more hinting at a conspiracy), Although, there may be some innocence in that direction,naivety perhaps, in so far as they did not understand the newspapers power over the Government-as they claim it is they- the newspapers, who sway a nation to vote one way of the other- and this story, and consequent stories kept the newspapers selling...
In other words it was greed and power by the newspapers who involved the Prime ministers. Hence why they needed a professional media 'spin doctor'.
Could the McCANNS now come clean and admit to anything, well, no-not really it is too late now- they would bring the government-and roopurt into the wrath of the public. They can't afford such a scandal.
So it's high ho- High Ho it's abductor story we go...