Alfred, has Redwood discovered anybody lying about covering up a crime? If he has got 6 million plus at his disposal and still cannot prove abduction then why would you expect me to prove somebody has lied about their crime? Would that not lead to a conviction?
I can however point you in the direction of the parents blatantly lying about the abduction campaign, so I'll ask you again. What reason have innocent people got to lie about events connected to the disappearance of their daughter?
This is just a small part of the suspicious behaviour displayed and highlighted by the videos. Behaviour which you inexplicably refuse to even consider. Instead looking for definitive proof of a crime. Alfred, there is no proof. If that is your only purpose then you may as well quit because you will not find any proof of anybody committing an abduction nor concealment of a body. Suspicious activity however stains the central characters continually which you turn a blind eye to. Simple question, why?