Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.

[Mr Gray]

Not to Brenda and I share many of her opinions and am also unrepentant.

I think Brenda realised many of her posts were something to be ashamed of...otherwise why would she ..as it seems..commit suicide

[faithlilly]

Poor lamb.

Vile trolls of the McCann must be left to troll in peace (and anonymity) ...

If tweeters are breaking the law then they should be dealt with appropriately.

Having an opinion, even if it goes against your sensibilities, does not make you a troll.

[ferryman]

Brenda had nothing to be ashamed of, certainly not her tweets. I cannot help but get the impression that you McCann supporters feel that she deserved her fate because she did not believe the parents.

A gross distortion of the thrust of the discussion.

We are discussing whether those who defame the McCanns deserve anonymity.

They clearly don't.

[Mr Gray]

Brenda had nothing to be ashamed of, certainly not her tweets. I cannot help but get the impression that you McCann supporters feel that she deserved her fate because she did not believe the parents.

I disagree...she had plenty to be ashamed of...I'm not ashamed of anything I have posted

[Alfred R Jones]

Brenda had nothing to be ashamed of, certainly not her tweets. I cannot help but get the impression that you McCann supporters feel that she deserved her fate because she did not believe the parents.

Nothing to be ashamed of?? You cannot be serious. 

[faithlilly]

I think Brenda realised many of her posts were something to be ashamed of...otherwise why would she ..as it seems..commit suicide

Being vilified by the press, even if there was no real justification for it, could have pushed her to take her own life.

[Alfred R Jones]

A gross distortion of the thrust of the discussion.

We are discussing whether those who defame the McCanns deserve anonymity.

They clearly don't.

Actually the purpose of this thread seems to be to put the frighteners on the dossier compilers, a bit of a tick-tock, see you in the dock kind of thread - it's laughable, really. 

[ferryman]

I think Brenda realised many of her posts were something to be ashamed of...otherwise why would she ..as it seems..commit suicide

I suppose death from natural causes hasn't been ruled out ...

[faithlilly]

A gross distortion of the thrust of the discussion.

We are discussing whether those who defame the McCanns deserve anonymity.

They clearly don't.

The thrust of this discussion, as you call it, is what will be revealed at the coroner's court.

If anonymity is an issue, it is whether the anonymity of the dossier compilers and those who abused Brenda both before and after her 'outing' will be revealed.

[Mr Gray]

Being vilified by the press, even if there was no real justification for it, could have pushed her to take her own life.

So we should stop vilifying people?...perhaps you should stop vilifying the McCanns...Brenda vilified the mccanns...would she have lost any sleep if kate had committed suicide...would you....I doubt either of you would

[Alfred R Jones]

Brenda wholeheartedly approved of outing "shills" as she called them and played an active role in attempting to do so on twitter.  FACT..

[faithlilly]

So we should stop vilifying people?...perhaps you should stop vilifying the McCanns...Brenda vilified the mccanns...would she have lost any sleep if kate had committed suicide...would you....I doubt either of you would

Didn't Kate say she didn't read what doubters said and she certainly didn't value their opinion ?

[Montclair]

Nothing to be ashamed of?? You cannot be serious.

Yes, I'm serious!

[Alfred R Jones]

Yes, I'm serious!

  So, you think her attempts to intimidate and out another Twitter user, in the mistaken belief that she was a witness in the McCann case, and in the hope that she would lose her job was nothing to be ashamed of?  You think mocking her appearance and weight quite admirable do you?  You think wishing eternal misery on the parents of a missing child perfectly understandable and acceptable do you?  I could go on...

[Alice Purjorick]

In very simple terms posting "Maddie was abducted" will always be removed whereas "Maddie was abducted imo" can stand but then that has always been the case.  Posters have from the beginning been invited to report all posts which break this cardinal rule so nothing new but a reminder does no harm.

As far as the coroner's court is concerned I don't see the dossier having a significant contribution to proceedings.  In fact I don't see it having any part to play at all even with the police as the threshold of abuse tolerance online these days is very high.  Tit for tat abuse between anonymous warring trolls is not something the police will ever spend resources on imo.

What a wonderful description. I'll drink to that!
Of course the word "dossier" lends gravitas to what is really a list compiled by one group of people with questionable principles of another group of people with questionable principles.
Like you I don't see this list featuring too much in the proceedings. One can envisage the coroner asking questions about the "what and where and when and how and why and who" regarding Mr Brunt's interview with the unfortunate lady as it would appear he was one of the last people to see her alive.