Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.

[Jean-Pierre]

It does make you wonder why the McCanns chose to bring a civil action against Tony Bennett rather than report him to the police for harassment ?

It seems they simply wanted him to stop defaming them - leaflets, books, the "foundation" etc.  Bringing a civil action was a way of doing so where they could exercise a measure of control over the proceedings.

They were not to know that he felt that standing by an undertaking to the High Court was optional.   

[Carew]

Who knows?  She was following him.

..........and apparently he was following her.............so it was just between the two of them, then............(plus his entourage and rolling sky news reports  ?)

Is that about right?

Dossiers compiled by Concerned Cowardly Anonymous Members of the Public purely coincidental?

[Eleanor]

..........and apparently he was following her.............so it was just between the two of them, then............(plus his entourage and rolling sky news reports  ?)

Is that about right?

Dossiers compiled by Concerned Cowardly Anonymous Members of the Public purely coincidental?

No.  She was involving other people.

There is nothing cowardly about being anonymous.  Unless some posters here have got some very funny names.
And anyway, The Police will know who compiled the dossier.

And it is all true and documented.

[Carew]

IIRC  Mrs Leyand had already involved the press herself - by previously making contact with Martin Brunt, a newspaper reporter?    (from memory so apols if I'm wrong about that)

It sounds as if you`d like some sort of distance between dossier compilers and their possible involvement with Sky News to be established.

[Carew]

No.  She was involving other people.

There is nothing cowardly about being anonymous.  Unless some posters here have got some very funny names.
And anyway, The Police will know who compiled the dossier.

And it is all true and documented.

...........and yet you seem to be trying to create distance between the confrontation of Mrs Leyland by Sky News and the dossier + its compilers.

Is that because you wish the confrontation hadn`t occurred and that the police should have made the decision if and who should be investigated?

[jassi]

No.  She was involving other people.

There is nothing cowardly about being anonymous.  Unless some posters here have got some very funny names.
And anyway, The Police will know who compiled the dossier.

And it is all true and documented.

If it is the dossier that you are talking about, how do you know?  Have you read the complete thing for yourself?

[Eleanor]

...........and yet you seem to be trying to create distance between the confrontation of Mrs Leyland by Sky News and the dossier + its compilers.

Is that because you wish the confrontation hadn`t occurred and that the police should have made the decision if and who should be investigated?

I wish Brenda had never started on her highly questionable campaign in the first place.  And actually, I feel sympathy for how miserable her life must have been.
But this sort of persistent abuse was bound to attract the attention of The Press eventually.

No I don't blame Martin Brunt for her death.  There is still a Free Press in UK.  And what has so far come out is all true.

[Eleanor]

If it is the dossier that you are talking about, how do you know?  Have you read the complete thing for yourself?

I have read quite a lot of the Tweets.  And I am sure that the rest is all true.  You can't mess with Screen Caps, and it will still all be on Brenda's computer.

[Mr Gray]

..........and apparently he was following her.............so it was just between the two of them, then............(plus his entourage and rolling sky news reports  ?)

Is that about right?

Dossiers compiled by Concerned Cowardly Anonymous Members of the Public purely coincidental?

Brenda herself could be describes as a cowardly anonymous member of the public

[Carana]

..........and apparently he was following her.............so it was just between the two of them, then............(plus his entourage and rolling sky news reports  ?)

Is that about right?

Dossiers compiled by Concerned Cowardly Anonymous Members of the Public purely coincidental?

What do you find cowardly about someone sending in information on threatening posts related to wishes of physical or psychological harm? What if some nutcase might actually decide to act out?

Why should however it is reveal his/her/their identity to the lynch mob brigade?
 

[Carew]

Brenda herself could be describes as a cowardly anonymous member of the public

She was described as such by those who felt she deserved to be "outed" whilst remaining anonymous themselves.

[Carew]

What do you find cowardly about someone sending in information on threatening posts related to wishes of physical or psychological harm? What if some nutcase might actually decide to act out?

Why should however it is reveal his/her/their identity to the lynch mob brigade?

Sending information where ?............To the press?

What lynch mob brigade?

The only actual "acting out" seems to have been done to Ms Leyland.

[Mr Gray]

Sending information where ?............To the press?

What lynch mob brigade?

The only actual "acting out" seems to have been done to Ms Leyland.

Brenda Leyland deserved to be outed by Brunt..IMO...she chose to spend all day tweeting abuse towards the mccanns...she brought it on herself

[Mr Gray]

No.  She was involving other people.

There is nothing cowardly about being anonymous.  Unless some posters here have got some very funny names.
And anyway, The Police will know who compiled the dossier.

And it is all true and documented.

There is nothing cowardly in being anonymous but there is something cowardly in being abusive and anonymous

[Alice Purjorick]

What do you find cowardly about someone sending in information on threatening posts related to wishes of physical or psychological harm? What if some nutcase might actually decide to act out?

Why should however it is reveal his/her/their identity to the lynch mob brigade?

Presumably the police having read the "dossier" will, if there is sufficient evidence, prosecute someone for the act of  "encouraging or assisting a crime" ?
Has anyone heard of such a case being brought resultant from the police receiving the "dossier"?