What has Redwood achieved in the Mccann case ?

[Albertini]

One thing DCI Andy Redwood achieved in doing his duty is that a whole pot of vitriol has been stirred up against him ... so he very obviously got something right ...

We will know that DCI Nicola Wall is getting somewhere when she gets more of the same treatment ... maybe even her very own thread here.

I hope you weren't referring to me or my posts in that? I have no vitriol against the man and will be withholding judgement on him until I see the full extent of his work on the case.

[Mr Gray]

How do you know there isn't new information?
How do you know they aren't being investigated?
How do you know they are still not considered suspects?

If as Benice and the yard have stated they aren't providing a running commentary?

The paucity of your argument and steadfastness in clinging to the McCann supporter mantra delivered by redwood is really quite revealing.

How do you know there isn't new information?
How do you know they aren't being investigated?
How do you know they are still not considered suspects?

google celestial teapot...that's how I know your arguments are ridiculously waek

[Albertini]

How do you know there isn't new information?
How do you know they aren't being investigated?
How do you know they are still not considered suspects?

google celestial teapot...that's how I know your arguments are ridiculously waek

So you don't know? Glad we've unequivocallly established that.

Yet you expect to convince people that becuase redwood said it months ago it remains the same now and forever more despite you knowing the square root of nothing relating to the evidence accumulated by the Yard since that statement was made.

Suggest you should google straw man.

[Albertini]

Double post

[Mr Gray]

So you don't know? Glad we've unequivocallly established that.

Yet you expect to convince people that becuase redwood said it months ago it remains the same now and forever more despite you knowing the square root of nothing relating to the evidence accumulated by the Yard since that statement was made.

Suggest you should google straw man.

I don't have to convince anyone....you will find more people supporting the earth is flat than believe your ridiculous beliefs

[Brietta]

I hope you weren't referring to me or my posts in that? I have no vitriol against the man and will be withholding judgement on him until I see the full extent of his work on the case.

I am delighted to hear that ... and it would possibly be a good piece of advice to others to allow the investigation to run it's full course before determining the measure of a man or a woman's input based on nothing more than personal bias.

These people are doing a job ... why that should set them up for often pejorative scrutiny as a result, should really give cause for concern.

[Albertini]

I don't have to convince anyone....you will find more people supporting the earth is flat than believe your ridiculous beliefs

No if you're going to rebut what I have said all you need to do is provide evidence and logic.

I'm still waiting.

It's really quite simple and let me boil it down in its simplest terms just for you.

If the Yard are not providing a running commentary on the progress of the investigation how can you state with absolute certainty that the pronouncement made by redwood many months ago at the start of the investigation  still stands now and will stand for the rest of time given we are not being told what evidence has been uncovered since redwoods statment was made?

[Albertini]

What evidence do we have regarding the Met's opinion of the McCanns' innocence or otherwise?  Well we do have the statement made by Andy Redwood as shown in my signature below, and that evidence tends to strongly suggest that the Met don't regard the McCanns as suspects.  And on the other hand we have - NOTHING AT ALL, which to the "sceptic" seems to suggest that the Met may well consider the McCanns as suspects.  It's quite hilarious, really.

You see here's the weird thing. If the Yard had clear and incontrovertible evidence which exonerated the group why haven't the details of that evidence been released to the media?

The Yard are surely aware of the cloud of suspicion that still hangs over the group, so why couldn't they simply release the information they had to clear them to then, once and for all,  exonerate all of them?

It would free the whole group from all the net and public speculation and would at a stroke remove all anti forums and twitterists.

I can't think of one good reason why, if this exoneration evidence existed, it wouldn't  and couldn't be released to the public.

Can you?

[Brietta]

You see here's the weird thing. If the Yard had clear and incontrovertible evidence which exonerated the group why haven't the details of that evidence been released to the media?

The Yard are surely aware of the cloud of suspicion that still hangs over the group, so why couldn't they simply release the information they had to clear them to then, once and for all,  exonerate all of them?

It would free the whole group from all the net and public speculation and would at a stroke remove all anti forums and twitterists.

I can't think of one good reason why, if this exoneration evidence existed, it wouldn't  and couldn't be released to the public.

Can you?

Why would it be NSY job to publish information to placate some on line freaks ... when you know, I know and they (SY) know ... it would do no such thing.

In what way would doing so help the main focus of this case ... Madeleine McCann.

[stephen25000]

SY have specifically ruled out the Mccanns

How can you rule potential suspects out of a case, when the nature of the crime has not been established ?

A belief in abduction does not make it real, it puts it on a par with David Icke's 'beliefs'.

[Mr Gray]

How can you rule potential suspects out of a case, when the nature of the crime has not been established ?

A belief in abduction does not make it real, it puts it on a par with David Icke's 'beliefs'.

so in your world shape shifting lizards are real...that explains a lot

[stephen25000]

Why would it be NSY job to publish information to placate some on line freaks ... when you know, I know and they (SY) know ... it would do no such thing.

In what way would doing so help the main focus of this case ... Madeleine McCann.

'on line freaks'

The forums on which they post with their hatred are well known. %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

[stephen25000]

so in your world shape shifting lizards are real...that explains a lot

No dave I didn't say that.

However, it would greatly explain much of your behaviour.

[Albertini]

Why would it be NSY job to publish information to placate some on line freaks ... when you know, I know and they (SY) know ... it would do no such thing.

In what way would doing so help the main focus of this case ... Madeleine McCann.

Because the last OFFICIAL word on the investigation, the archiving report,stated that the group wouldn't help the investigation move forward by refusing to participate in the reconstruction and that the McCann's had as a result failed to demonstrate their innocence.

Why would the Yard leave the group exposed to that condemnation if they had clear exoneration evidence?

Hell they could have given it to Clarence to release, I'm sure he'd welcome the opportunity to spin that.

Finally it would have been jolly helpful to have that information in Durates back pocket over in Lisbon recently, wouldn't it?

I wonder why it wasn't produced in the trial? Surely that would have made their case against Amaral watertight?

[stephen25000]

As a brief reminder to the mccann followers.


There is no concrete evidence of anything and it is not known except by those responsible who removed her body from the apartment, and that's not counting the theory, she walked out herself.

So how can the mccanns and associates have been eliminated from their inquires ?

It is on a par with a certain other case, as we have seen.