Eddie and Keela and what the alerts meant if anything.

[Mr Gray]

No. it's how you have chosen to interpret what he says in my opinion.

So you don't think the fact that grime now says that cadaver dog alerts can be corroborated by anectdotal witness statements represents a change from 2007

I don't see it as, a matter of opinion... I see it as, a matter of fact

[Robittybob1]

So you don't think the fact that grime now says that cadaver dog alerts can be corroborated by anectdotal witness statements represents a change from 2007

I don't see it as, a matter of opinion... I see it as, a matter of fact

Well it won't be resolved just by stating your case.

[The General]

So you don't think the fact that grime now says that cadaver dog alerts can be corroborated by anectdotal witness statements represents a change from 2007

I don't see it as, a matter of opinion... I see it as, a matter of fact

You've just interpreted it in that way. That's fine. You've told us, we know, thanks.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You've just interpreted it in that way. That's fine. You've told us, we know, thanks.

How do you interpret it?

[Mr Gray]

You've just interpreted it in that way. That's fine. You've told us, we know, thanks.

I haven't interpreted anything... I've stated facts.. Facts that by your reply cannot refute.. Can you show my claim is based on interpretation.. What other interpretations are there... Where's your evidence to support your claim or is it as I suspect an empty claim based on nothing

[slartibartfast]

So you don't think the fact that grime now says that cadaver dog alerts can be corroborated by anectdotal witness statements represents a change from 2007

I don't see it as, a matter of opinion... I see it as, a matter of fact

In PdL Grime would probably know there was no other strong evidence and the alerts would rely on forensic confirmation.

[Vertigo Swirl]

In PdL Grime would probably know there was no other strong evidence and the alerts would rely on forensic confirmation.

How would he probably know that?

[Mr Gray]

In PdL Grime would probably know there was no other strong evidence and the alerts would rely on forensic confirmation.

Grime said more than that... He said as no remains were found the alerts could not become corroborated.

[Mr Gray]

In PdL Grime would probably know there was no other strong evidence and the alerts would rely on forensic confirmation.

Are you stating opinion or fact

[Mr Gray]

In PdL Grime would probably know there was no other strong evidence and the alerts would rely on forensic confirmation.

Anectdotal witness statements  are not strong evidence

[Mr Gray]

This is what harrison had to say in his statement,...

Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

no mention of anectdotal witness statements

[Robittybob1]

How would he probably know that?

  The PJ might have told him, or the UK police might have known what the PJ knew and they told Grime.

[Robittybob1]

This is what harrison had to say in his statement,...

Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

no mention of anectdotal witness statements

But he is not a judge either. 

[The General]

This is what harrison had to say in his statement,...

Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

no mention of anectdotal witness statements

So what? Grime knows the process, just like you know how to administer superfluous, costly dental treatment.

[Mr Gray]

  The PJ might have told him, or the UK police might have known what the PJ knew and they told Grime.

grime  think was clear...harrison i know was clear...physical evidence required to corroborate the alerts...that is not opinion...its fact. in the lane case....no physical evidence ...but grime claims anectdotal witness staements  corroborate them....whats going on