Eddie and Keela and what the alerts meant if anything.

[Mr Gray]

Let's pack all the dogs in then, eh?

You are not following the argument..

The dogs are useful tools.. They are very good at some things

[Mr Gray]

Grime wants the dogs to be scientifically validated... I totally agree with him

[Robittybob1]

What do you think... If you are going to continually contradict me it might be s good idea to know the facts

I found this statement by Grime:
"Please refer to my original report included in the summary (MG/1).
The interpretation of any alert is given when the dogs recognize a specific odour as a result of a response to the behaviour for which they were trained. This response must then be submitted to a forensic examination in order to draw conclusions."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

And:
"There is always a possibility of contamination of odours by transferral. EVRD does not make a distinction; he responds with a certain behaviour for which he was trained when he recognizes an odour. He does not identify the reasons for the presence of the odour nor does he identify suspects. Forensic confirmation and specialized investigation methods will determine the reasons and the suspicions. In order to undoubtedly affirm there must be a confirmation of the alert signals made by the dog."

So far he is only trained to alert when he finds odours he was trained to find.

Odours not evidence. Odours not things.

[Mr Gray]

I found this statement by Grime:
"Please refer to my original report included in the summary (MG/1).
The interpretation of any alert is given when the dogs recognize a specific odour as a result of a response to the behaviour for which they were trained. This response must then be submitted to a forensic examination in order to draw conclusions."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

And:
"There is always a possibility of contamination of odours by transferral. EVRD does not make a distinction; he responds with a certain behaviour for which he was trained when he recognizes an odour. He does not identify the reasons for the presence of the odour nor does he identify suspects. Forensic confirmation and specialized investigation methods will determine the reasons and the suspicions. In order to undoubtedly affirm there must be a confirmation of the alert signals made by the dog."

So far he is only trained to alert when he finds odours he was trained to find.

Odours not evidence. Odours not things.

I develop methods of detecting forensically recoverable evidence by the use
of dogs and facilitate training.


That's from Grimes statement.... Odours are not forensically recoverable evidence

[Robittybob1]

I develop methods of detecting forensically recoverable evidence by the use
of dogs and facilitate training.

The forensic team recovers the evidence, the dog detects the odour in order to direct the forensic team where to look for the evidence.

[The General]

You are not following the argument..

The dogs are useful tools.. They are very good at some things

I am following the argument.

[The General]

I develop methods of detecting forensically recoverable evidence by the use
of dogs and facilitate training.


That's from Grimes statement.... Odours are not forensically recoverable evidence

The semtex is the evidence, the dog found it under a car. Using his nose. To sniff.

[pathfinder73]

How long is it there for..would it have lasted 3 months in 5a
3months in the outside flower bed ..what does the evidence tell us

Eddie detected Theresa Parker's cadaver scent 6 months later in a garage before her body was moved 30 miles away.

"Grime said Eddie then "hit" on an abandoned house next door. Testimony shows that house was never repaired after a fire gutted the inside and killed a child several years ago."

[The General]

Eddie detected Theresa Parker's cadaver scent 6 months later in a garage before her body was moved 30 miles away.

"Grime said Eddie then "hit" on an abandoned house next door. Testimony shows that house was never repaired after a fire gutted the inside and killed a child several years ago."

Eddie is the man. No wonder 'supporters' are desperate to disparage his talents.

[Mr Gray]

The forensic team recovers the evidence, the dog detects the odour in order to direct the forensic team where to look for the evidence.

Not picking... Grime trains the dogs... The purpose of training  is to detect evidence ...the dog detected attracta harrons corpse

[The General]

Not picking... Grime trains the dogs... The purpose of training  is to detect evidence ...the dog detected attracta harrons corpse

A what now?

[Robittybob1]

You are not following the argument..

The dogs are useful tools.. They are very good at some things

Repeat after me "The cadaver dog is trained to find odours not evidence nor objects".

Not picking... Grime trains the dogs... The purpose of training  is to detect evidence ...the dog detected attracta harrons corpse

No the dog detected the odour of the corpse, not the corpse.

[Mr Gray]

The semtex is the evidence, the dog found it under a car. Using his nose. To sniff.

According to rob... Dogs don't find evidence

[Mr Gray]

That was found near to the killer's home so Eddie was searching there - it was not moved 30 miles away from the home as killer Sam Parker did.

The dog didn't find the body

[Mr Gray]

Repeat after me "The cadaver dog is trained to find odours not evidence nor objects".
No the dog detected the odour of the corpse, not the corpse.

The dig is trained to detect evidence... According to grime...