How on earth can a disorganised relatively small bunch of online folk possibly "derail Operation Grange"? Explain, please.
And when there is complete, total, 100% anti-doubting in the mass media, why is that not enough?
It is a rather grand claim I have to say. In most cases police conclusions can only be questioned after the event. The McCann case is very different because people have access to the initial case files. So when Operation Grange cleared 'Tannerman' people were able to point out that he was going the wrong way if he was a dad taking his child home from the creche. When they kind of hinted that the Smith family helped to create the efits shown on Crimewatch the files said different. I see this as a good thing as it may keep the police on their toes and ensure they get their facts right. In fact these two examples suggest to me that the Met. police may have an entirely undeserved reputation as an excellent force! We would know nothing if it wasn't for the internet as the McCanns silenced any doubts expressed by the mainstream media .
Yes Alfred. I'm a lot of things but a coward isn't one of them. I would be perfectly comfortable informing the McCann's relatives that I have doubts about their story, but I probably wouldn't be crass enough to do it at a social function unless they raised the matter first, then I would reply.
I would not discuss this case with children except in the simplest of terms. If my children found out details from others I would discuss it with them and make sure they had a balanced view. Hopefully they would be brought up well enough not to bait others at a party and if they did so they would be in trouble with me. (I do have some, the youngest is 46)