I agree it doesn't appear SC moved but some sort of reflex action cannot be ruled out eg cadaveric spasm:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadaveric_spasm
The rifle was a semi-auto so the slightest touch of the trigger would release another bullet. Dr Vanezis said he had experienced 4 or 5 suicides with two gunshot wounds.
If SC's state at the soc was indicative of murder why did EP wait some 30 days to interview JB under caution and a further 20 plus days to arrest and charge him? Plus allow him to leave the country and return under his own steam. Dr Vanezis said all four officers present at the pm concluded they were dealing with 4 murders and a suicide. If they had any doubts why not discuss them with Dr Vanezis during the post mortem?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=206.0;attach=738
Initially DS Jones was the only dissenter. He was not some high flying police officer. At the time of the murders he was 45 yoa and only a DS. I would like to know about the entry requirements and recruitment practices at the time DS Jones was recruited.
1) Multiple shot suicides feature people who fail to kill themselves with the first shot and then actively decide to fire a second shot not people who fire a gun a second time and nearly all of these feature the people choosing different loactions for the second or third shots.
2) As has been pointed out to you numerous times a cadaveric spasm results in the body freezeing and the oNLY wepaon that such could cause to fire again is a fully automatic wepaon because a fully automatic weapon fires until the trigger is released.
3) The second shot was under her chin not in her neck, a double tap of the trigger (which would not be the result of a cadaveric spasm) would result in the seocnd wound being much closer to the first not a totally different trajectory. The trajectory of the first shot is nearly level from the fromnt of her neck to the back indicating the weapon was fired at nearly a 90 degree angle to her neck whereas the second shot was through her chin into her brain.
4) After the first shot Sheila stuck her right outer palm/wrist to her wound and blood flowed down to her elbow. If she had shot herself she would have needed to put the gun down in order to do this and then to pick it up again to fire the fatal shot because dead people can't move their arms.
5) Sheila can't have shot herself. Not only would she have had GSR on her hands and clothign and soot on her clothing had she shot herself, the angle of the shots would have been different and most importantly Sheila was shot while seated which resulted in the blood flowing down her shoulder/side of her breast with the moderator attached. The killer removed the moderator and hid it in the closet. Then the killer moved her body flat in order to stick the gun on top of her body. At that point the blood flow changed. A little bit of blood on her shoulder was still wet and proceeded to run down the side of her shoulder. Some blood was still in her neck and that ran down the side of her neck to the floor where it pooled. After the pool formed but while this blood was still wet the killer stuck the Bible in it.
It is quite obvious that Sheila didn't shoot anyone else either or beat Nevill. Had she done so then she would have had evidence on her clothing and body the killer was particularly full of Nevill's blood after beating him. The notion Sheila decided to wash up to conceal she had killed them is nonsense and she could not have gotten rid of her blood/GSR/soot stained clothing- it would have been found at the scene. Clearly she didn't kill everyone else then clean up and prepare for someone else to kill her like the members of the doomesday cult you love to bring up did. The same person who killed her clearly killed everyone else as well.
You have nothing to establish Jeremy's innocence or that Sheila did a thing. You thus resort to desperation at every turn including the desperate account that because police were initially fooled by Jeremy's claims and the staging this proves it was a murder suicide. By definitil their initial thoughts are worthless. What counts is what the evidence proves after it is processed. They had no idea whether she had GSR on her hands or clothign or whose blood was on her clothing. They didn't know Jeremy was lying about her being proficient with all the wepaons in the house. They didn't know the moderator was used. They didn't know Nevill had been shot in the bedroom along with June before things progressed to the kitchen or that Nevill was unable to speak after his initial wounds. Taff Jones' initial assessment was WAAAAAAAAY off the mark:
Right off the bat he misread the scene by ignoring the blood in the bed that proved June had been shot in bed. His theory featured Sheila grabbing the gun after Nevill was already on the phone with Jeremy which makes no sense. It makes no sense for Nevill to call Jeremy then for her to grab the gun and Nevill to at that point convey to Jeremy that she had the gun. Nor would it make sense to beat Nevill when she could have just shot him. She would have had a hard time beating his head in if he had not already been shot first. He was much taller than her so how would she be able to bash his head in? He had to first be knocked to the ground to be able to then bash his head in.
The initial assessment was made from a position of relative ignorance so it not in the least bit helpful to establishing Jeremy is innocent.
