Wandering Off Topic

[G-Unit]

15 years later and people still need to remind the rest of the world what perfect parents they are.  Yes, we get it and I expect the McCanns have got it by now too, but nothing like repeating the same old mantras over and over again until you're blue in the face.

Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid. Not only because it's true, but because it contradicts the image the parents and their friends projected. "They are very, very anxious parents and very careful..." said a friend. Talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. There's no such thing as a perfect parent - even those with enough sense to know that a babysitters a good idea for small children aren't perfect, just sensible enough to know why.

[Mr Gray]

Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid. Not only because it's true, but because it contradicts the image the parents and their friends projected. "They are very, very anxious parents and very careful..." said a friend. Talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. There's no such thing as a perfect parent - even those with enough sense to know that a babysitters a good idea for small children aren't perfect, just sensible enough to know why.

What rubbish.. I see it as vindictive nastiness from you and other sceptics. If what you are posting is true why have you never directed your vindictive nastiness towards the Needham. Why was Ben allowed to play outside.. Out of hearing and sight... In a dangerous environment.

[The General]

What rubbish.. I see it as vindictive nastiness from you and other sceptics. If what you are posting is true why have you never directed your vindictive nastiness towards the Needham. Why was Ben allowed to play outside.. Out of hearing and sight... In a dangerous environment.

I already know its not a good idea to leave children and don't need to be advised by the likes of you every 5 minutes

Where can one vent my fury at the Needhams? Asking for a friend.

[Brietta]

Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid. Not only because it's true, but because it contradicts the image the parents and their friends projected. "They are very, very anxious parents and very careful..." said a friend. Talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. There's no such thing as a perfect parent - even those with enough sense to know that a babysitters a good idea for small children aren't perfect, just sensible enough to know why.

Is that the best you can come up with "Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid." to justify the hatred and malice for fifteen years?

I think you may have a serious problem which can be summed up in your criticism of the 'fraudulent fund' her parents set up and used to investigate her disappearance.

[The General]

Is that the best you can come up with "Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid." to justify the hatred and malice for fifteen years?

I think you may have a serious problem which can be summed up in your criticism of the 'fraudulent fund' her parents set up and used to investigate her disappearance.

Since first encountering some of the absolutely vile McCann content available on the internet it has been obvious to me and of greatest concern, that the most vulnerable to it was always going to be the McCann children.

After a two week inquest a coroner finds that in the death of fourteen year old Molly Russell, harmful online content was likely to have contributed to Molly’s death ‘in a more than minimal way’. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/30/molly-russell-died-while-suffering-negative-effects-of-online-content-rules-coroner

It was always abusive to indulge in the McCann hate fest on the internet.  It was always obvious that at some future time Madeleine's siblings would be exposed to it in one way or another.
Indeed I have seen it claimed in mitigation by sceptic offenders, the hope that the children will "question" their parents.

If these sceptics were too obtuse to work out exactly how abusive their hobby of attacking the family is - they most certainly don't have that excuse now.

Internet content on social media has yet again played its part in influencing the death of a young person.  "Anti facebook groups etc." have been deliberately posting content which will cause distress to the young people exposed to it for years.

It is a measure of the type of individuals they are.

What's the difference?

[Wonderfulspam]

What's the difference?

She's a total hypocrite isn't she.
Spends her time hating on Amaral & sceptics every day.
You won't find her actually doing anything to help find Maddie though.

[G-Unit]

Is that the best you can come up with "Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid." to justify the hatred and malice for fifteen years?

I think you may have a serious problem which can be summed up in your criticism of the 'fraudulent fund' her parents set up and used to investigate her disappearance.

I'm commemting on one video, not on what you refer to as fifteen years of 'hatred and malice'. If that includes pointing out that caring, anxious, careful parents are unlikely to leave small children home alone every evening then I don't see how that can be seen as 'hatred and malice', it's just truthful.

Imo I have no serious problems and if you truly think I have perhaps you need to examine your own attitudes. I've never called the Fund fraudulent, for example, as you seem to be hinting I have.

[The General]

I'm commemting on one video, not on what you refer to as fifteen years of 'hatred and malice'. If that includes pointing out that caring, anxious, careful parents are unlikely to leave small children home alone every evening then I don't see how that can be seen as 'hatred and malice', it's just truthful.

Imo I have no serious problems and if you truly think I have perhaps you need to examine your own attitudes. I've never called the Fund fraudulent, for example, as you seem to be hinting I have.

It's cyber bullying, a practice she alleges to despise, which is also quite hypocritical, particularly from a moderator.

[G-Unit]

It's cyber bullying, a practice she alleges to despise, which is also quite hypocritical, particularly from a moderator.

There's a lot of bullying, hatred, malice and abuse on here, no need to generalise about the internet. Interesting, many of the posts made here by the supporters (including moderators) wouldn't be allowed on Websleuths. That forum does indeed make moderation on here look non-existent. 
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg676249;topicseen#msg676249

[Mr Gray]

There's a lot of bullying, hatred, malice and abuse on here, no need to generalise about the internet. Interesting, many of the posts made here by the supporters (including moderators) wouldn't be allowed on Websleuths. That forum does indeed make moderation on here look non-existent. 
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg676249;topicseen#msg676249

if you are going to criticise moderation you have allowed abuse towards me then reported my response to john...who later overruled your complaint..that has to be poor moderation

[John]

Please keep comments relevant and within the rules please guys and gals. TY

[kizzy]

Is that the best you can come up with "Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid." to justify the hatred and malice for fifteen years?

I think you may have a serious problem which can be summed up in your criticism of the 'fraudulent fund' her parents set up and used to investigate her disappearance.

What is your game and motive B

In your posts, you like to come across as the caring voice of reason yetttt.

Your posts vilify anyone who has a different opinion on the mccs to yours.

Your posts show nothing but contempt for GA....yet don't realize contempt is what a lot of people have for the mccs....and you are no different from them.

YOU have spent years slagging off anyone who is on Maddie's side for justice and don't believe the mccs version.

They have as much right as you to voice their opinion...or to not believe the abduction version.

You should realize they are not bad parents ...they are people who do not believe the mccs version of events.

[Mr Gray]

What is your game and motive B

In your posts, you like to come across as the caring voice of reason yetttt.

Your posts vilify anyone who has a different opinion on the mccs to yours.

Your posts show nothing but contempt for GA....yet don't realize contempt is what a lot of people have for the mccs....and you are no different from them.

YOU have spent years slagging off anyone who is on Maddie's side for justice and don't believe the mccs version.

They have as much right as you to voice their opinion...or to not believe the abduction version.

You should realize they are not bad parents ...they are people who do not believe the mccs version of events.

i dont have contempt for Amaral I just think hes as thick as a plank and a very poor policeman

[Vertigo Swirl]

Pointing out that leaving three small children home alone is inacceptable is perfectly valid. Not only because it's true, but because it contradicts the image the parents and their friends projected. "They are very, very anxious parents and very careful..." said a friend. Talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. There's no such thing as a perfect parent - even those with enough sense to know that a babysitters a good idea for small children aren't perfect, just sensible enough to know why.

What purpose does making this observation continually and regularly 15 years after the event actually serve other than to make the poster feel superior and virtuous do you think?  Do you think there are significant numbers of parents out there who don't know that leaving young children alone is ill-advised and need educating?  We are always led to believe that what the McCanns did was something that virtually no parent would ever have done so surely constantly harping on about it is a waste of time - apart from it makes their critics feel so much better about themselves? 

[G-Unit]

Please keep comments relevant and within the rules please guys and gals. TY

Is it within the rules to tell others you think they have a serious problem or to refer to them as 'the likes of you? I don't find it acceptable I'm afraid.