Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2936503 times)

0 Members and 118 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16260 on: February 11, 2026, 01:27:24 PM »
Your wholehearted belief in Craig Murray is quite touching. So what conclusions do you draw from this government interference as far as the McCanns are concerned?  Why are we even discussing it now?  I mean when all is said and done, SO WHAT?

So What


Look we are not on PM ...this is a forum were things are discussed or read its not all about you.

There are so many things at the beginning were every thing was skimmed over as the norm.

especially with spin doctor CM.

So many things - its hard to know where to start.

Why was the fund started...the 11 top lawyers...not forgetting the 48 questions.

Those wasn't trick questions or entrapment ones ....so why didn't she answer them...Knowing by not doing so could harm the investigation.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYH_TsybX4o&t=28s


31k views  5 months ago  #MadeleineMcCann #KateMcCann #TrueCrime
Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 key questions from investigators after Madeleine?s disappearance? In this in-depth breakdown, we go through each of those questions, what they meant, and why her silence continues to raise suspicions nearly two decades later.


PS.

Forgot to send a few days ago.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16261 on: February 11, 2026, 01:43:21 PM »
Oh dear Oh dear. I was posting about the Wootton video. Not a news paper article.

I wont bother saying what was your point.
Kizzy you are coming across rather petulant.  But if you want to believe Ghislaine Maxwell was involved then it's quite clear nothing I or anyone else on here has to say on the matter is going to dissuade you.  Fill your boots.  Do you think she crept into the apartment herself, or do you think Gerry delivered Maddie to her on her yacht?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16262 on: February 11, 2026, 01:54:00 PM »
This alleged sighting really is nothing of the sort. It's from a dubious source, in the wrong place and the wrong context.

The Smith sighting, however, in my opinion, remains one of the more credible witness reports in the case, but it has not been definitively explained or resolved to my knowledge.

No one identified as the man carrying the child that night has come forward.

Again, quite why this completely unrelated (to the case) set of witnesses would voluntarily inject themselves into the case several weeks later is also to be explained. I doubt it was for any personal gain / fame / infamy / ulterior motive, given that the family visited their co-owned apartment regularly.
It's an odd one.
Interestingly they only came forward after their acquaintance Robert Murat was made an arguido.  In my opinion they came forward as a result of that, keen to get him off the hook by saying the man they saw carrying a child that night definitely wasn't him and that they'd have known if it had been.  OTOH they said they wouldn't be able to recognise the man again (not until 4 months later anyway when suddenly Smith's memory miraculously sharpened as a result of a method of child carrying employed by Gerry McCann).   Personally I think the fact that they knew a child had gone missing the very day after the sighting, thought it might have been Madeleine and then chose not to tell anyone for 3 weeks is quite unforgiveable but it does show that some people are reluctant to come forward with information in high profile cases for whatever reason, which could explain why, if Smithman was just a dad collecting his child from the creche, he hasn't ever come forward. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16263 on: February 11, 2026, 01:57:22 PM »

So What


Look we are not on PM ...this is a forum were things are discussed or read its not all about you.

There are so many things at the beginning were every thing was skimmed over as the norm.

especially with spin doctor CM.

So many things - its hard to know where to start.

Why was the fund started...the 11 top lawyers...not forgetting the 48 questions.

Those wasn't trick questions or entrapment ones ....so why didn't she answer them...Knowing by not doing so could harm the investigation.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYH_TsybX4o&t=28s


31k views  5 months ago  #MadeleineMcCann #KateMcCann #TrueCrime
Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 key questions from investigators after Madeleine?s disappearance? In this in-depth breakdown, we go through each of those questions, what they meant, and why her silence continues to raise suspicions nearly two decades later.


PS.

Forgot to send a few days ago.
Thanks so much for finally remembering to send - really great questions which I don't think have ever been discussed before...zzz
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16264 on: February 11, 2026, 02:17:09 PM »
Kizzy you are coming across rather petulant.  But if you want to believe Ghislaine Maxwell was involved then it's quite clear nothing I or anyone else on here has to say on the matter is going to dissuade you.  Fill your boots.  Do you think she crept into the apartment herself, or do you think Gerry delivered Maddie to her on her yacht?

Oh swerl did I believe CB was the abductor  five year ago No - seems you fell for it hook line n sinker.

The efit for a sighting in 2009 was the double of G. M...I replied to a post anything is possible in this case.

I should imagine by now you know exactly what I believe.........although you always like to twist it.

I beleive and always have.........the mccs know what happened to Maddie.


Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16265 on: February 11, 2026, 02:19:45 PM »
Thanks so much for finally remembering to send - really great questions which I don't think have ever been discussed before...zzz

In this in-depth breakdown, we go through each of those questions, what they meant, and why her silence continues to raise suspicions nearly two decades later.

Ok again this is not for your benefit ...its a forum. Did you watch the video made twenty years later. 2025

People are still interested ......so you can zzzz as much as you like - its not about you.or what you want to discuss

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16266 on: February 11, 2026, 02:26:03 PM »
In this in-depth breakdown, we go through each of those questions, what they meant, and why her silence continues to raise suspicions nearly two decades later.

Ok again this is not for your benefit ...its a forum. Did you watch the video made twenty years later. 2025

People are still interested ......so you can zzzz as much as you like - its not about you.or what you want to discuss
Oh sorry, I didn't realise it's all about you and what you want to discuss, my mistake.  All I would say though is if you don't want to hear what I have to say about things then don't ask my opinion because the only one I can give is mine, so sorry again.  In fact, as I annoy you so much it might be an idea to put me on ignore like Faith and Spam have?  Just a thought.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2026, 06:42:36 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16267 on: February 11, 2026, 03:23:23 PM »
Oh sorry, I didn't realise it's all about you and what you want to discuss, my mistake.  All I would say though is if you don't want to hear what I have to think about things then don't ask my opinion because the only one I can give is mine, so sorry again.  In fact, as I annoy you so much it might be an idea to put me on ignore like Faith and Spam have?  Just a thought.

Dont worry about it swirl ...I dont..........no need to apologize

Put you on ignore....never I do like you. x

I was off the forum for months an months  an saw -  your sad post saying.

only a few saddoes like me left haunting the place.


I did think aww most of us are  -  last line of defence for what happened to Maddie.

Still not one bit of proof of abduction....and still so many red flags that need going over and over again imo.

Seems utube ful of recent video's of the mccs being involved in what happened to Maddie...2 decades later

In one of your posts you said my opinion is worth very little....to me neither is yours.

If I put you on ignore it would mean you are a threat to me ...and your not.

Thinking on them lines ....maybe you should put me on ignore.


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16268 on: February 11, 2026, 03:39:34 PM »
Dont worry about it swirl ...I dont..........no need to apologize

Put you on ignore....never I do like you. x

I was off the forum for months an months  an saw -  your sad post saying.

only a few saddoes like me left haunting the place.


I did think aww most of us are  -  last line of defence for what happened to Maddie.

Still not one bit of proof of abduction....and still so many red flags that need going over and over again imo.

Seems utube ful of recent video's of the mccs being involved in what happened to Maddie...2 decades later

In one of your posts you said my opinion is worth very little....to me neither is yours.

If I put you on ignore it would mean you are a threat to me ...and your not.

Thinking on them lines ....maybe you should put me on ignore.
Put you on ignore?  Oh no, there'd be no fun in that Kizzy, you're the funniest poster on here! 

You do realise that youtube has been chock full of nonsense about this case for years don't you?  You could put a million youtube videos online and it still wouldn't bring us any closer to knowing the truth about what happened to Madeleine but I am prepared to stick my neck out here and now and say that neither Ghislaine Maxwell nor the McCanns themselves have any idea what happened to her either.   Of course, if Burnt Salamander ever gets round to putting his video online of the McCanns burying Maddie's body on top of a cliff then  I might have to eat my words.  I wonder what he has to say about the Ghislaine connection?  Of course if she's involved then it means the dogs must be lying, unless it was a dead Maddie she was looking to kidnap.  Who knows with these Satanist paedoes eh?

Anyway, glad you've decided not to ignore me and decided to keep this saddo company, it's much appreciated.   
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16269 on: February 11, 2026, 03:45:39 PM »
Really?  Lay it all out below then.
Well just the two independent witness identifications, Vertigo!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16270 on: February 11, 2026, 04:14:46 PM »
Well just the two independent witness identifications, Vertigo!
That's not right though is it?  There's one id in Barcelona that said the woman had an Australian accent and never mentioned Ghislaine Maxell for a start.  The efit was said to be a deadringer for Victoria Beckham at the time and was widely ridiculed amongst McCann sceptics for that reason. Now it's supposed to be Ghislaine Maxwell?   The second witness thought he saw someone years earlier who looked like it might have been Ghislaine Maxwell with a 6 year old girl who had half her face covered by her hand who he thought might be Madeleine McCann and only came forward because of all the media coverage given to Maxwell years after the event.  And you think this is stronger evidence than there is against CB?  I think you're having a giraffe frankly. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16271 on: February 11, 2026, 04:33:06 PM »
That's not right though is it?  There's one id in Barcelona that said the woman had an Australian accent and never mentioned Ghislaine Maxell for a start.  The efit was said to be a deadringer for Victoria Beckham at the time and was widely ridiculed amongst McCann sceptics for that reason. Now it's supposed to be Ghislaine Maxwell?   The second witness thought he saw someone years earlier who looked like it might have been Ghislaine Maxwell with a 6 year old girl who had half her face covered by her hand who he thought might be Madeleine McCann and only came forward because of all the media coverage given to Maxwell years after the event.  And you think this is stronger evidence than there is against CB?  I think you're having a giraffe frankly.

And you think this is stronger evidence than there is against CB?

What is that stronger evidence then against CB...........

Considering he has never been charged with anything to do with Maddie.

Is now a free man .....probably by now living in a council property in Germany.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16272 on: February 11, 2026, 04:33:24 PM »
Put you on ignore?  Oh no, there'd be no fun in that Kizzy, you're the funniest poster on here! 

You do realise that youtube has been chock full of nonsense about this case for years don't you?  You could put a million youtube videos online and it still wouldn't bring us any closer to knowing the truth about what happened to Madeleine but I am prepared to stick my neck out here and now and say that neither Ghislaine Maxwell nor the McCanns themselves have any idea what happened to her either.   Of course, if Burnt Salamander ever gets round to putting his video online of the McCanns burying Maddie's body on top of a cliff then  I might have to eat my words.  I wonder what he has to say about the Ghislaine connection?  Of course if she's involved then it means the dogs must be lying, unless it was a dead Maddie she was looking to kidnap.  Who knows with these Satanist paedoes eh?

Anyway, glad you've decided not to ignore me and decided to keep this saddo company, it's much appreciated.

Put you on ignore?  Oh no, there'd be no fun in that Kizzy, you're the funniest poster on here!

Awww bless

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16273 on: February 11, 2026, 05:14:38 PM »
That's not right though is it?  There's one id in Barcelona that said the woman had an Australian accent and never mentioned Ghislaine Maxell for a start.  The efit was said to be a deadringer for Victoria Beckham at the time and was widely ridiculed amongst McCann sceptics for that reason. Now it's supposed to be Ghislaine Maxwell?   The second witness thought he saw someone years earlier who looked like it might have been Ghislaine Maxwell with a 6 year old girl who had half her face covered by her hand who he thought might be Madeleine McCann and only came forward because of all the media coverage given to Maxwell years after the event.  And you think this is stronger evidence than there is against CB?  I think you're having a giraffe frankly.
Do we know when the Maxwell/Maddie witness went to the police with their evidence, Vertigo?
Did Maxwell still have her yacht in 2007? Could this be Eleoners yacht?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2026, 05:26:08 PM by Joe Blogs »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16274 on: February 11, 2026, 05:23:49 PM »
And you think this is stronger evidence than there is against CB?

What is that stronger evidence then against CB...........

Considering he has never been charged with anything to do with Maddie.

Is now a free man .....probably by now living in a council property in Germany.
The evidence we know about has been discussed on here for the last 5 years, over and over again.  It is certainly stronger evidence than that which apparently exists for Ghislaine Maxwell?s involvement.  CB has not been charged but that doesn?t mean he didn?t do it, only that there is not strong enough evidence to charge. 
FYI the McCanns are free too and definitely living in a big house in England.  I guess that means they didn?t do it either.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".