Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2786711 times)

0 Members and 150 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20205 on: August 26, 2026, 10:02:47 PM »
Well that really debunks the evidence I presented. Well done you. Genius.
I have debunked your nonsense repeatedly. It?s not my fault you?re too dense to let it sink in.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20206 on: August 26, 2026, 10:04:14 PM »

You're an embarrassment to McCann supporters, Women & the wider human race really VS.
Are you trying to make me cry Spammy?  You?ll have to try a lot harder than that silly little sausage that you are.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20207 on: August 26, 2026, 10:06:08 PM »
What evidence supports Smith?s witness statement given 4 months after the brief encounter that the man he saw was Gerry?  Last time you answered I think you said ?because Madeleine wasn?t abducted? or some such nonsense.

The fact that the McCanns buried the e-fits, Gerry was off searching alone having suggested they split up & search, even though he knew Maddie couldn't have left on her own. That Gerry happened to posses similar trousers to the abductor, & Smithman's Maddie being dressed in the wrong pyjamas. All evidence that support Smith & Wife's belief it was Gerry.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20208 on: August 26, 2026, 10:06:56 PM »
Poor VS, she's gone to lie down. The evidence doesn't really support her firmly held beliefs & she just can't handle it. Just a last gasp appeal to an authority, who, by their own admission, haven't investigated the McCanns, & released e-fits of Gerry. I think I'd go to bed too if I made a complete tw.. of myself like she has.
I?m watching the news, and prior to that I was watching Masterchef.  Sorry to leave you hanging for 10 whole minutes but you have wasted rather a lot of my time today already and a word of warning, I will have to go to sleep at some point so won?t be able to play with you all night as well.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20209 on: August 26, 2026, 10:07:02 PM »
I have debunked your nonsense repeatedly. It?s not my fault you?re too dense to let it sink in.

No you absolutely have not. So not only are you a moron, you are also a liar.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20210 on: August 26, 2026, 10:07:57 PM »
I?m watching the news, and prior to that I was watching Masterchef.  Sorry to leave you hanging for 10 whole minutes but you have wasted rather a lot of my time today already and a word of warning, I will have to go to sleep at some point so won?t be able to play with you all night as well.

Yes. Go & escape from reality dear. It is clear you cannot handle reality.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20211 on: August 26, 2026, 10:09:38 PM »

It only took VS the last 19 years up until today to realise Matt gave a different time to the rest of the group.
That's progress I suppose.
He didn?t on the handwritten Timeline nor on the 4th May statement he gave the police.  He never gave a time that the alarm was raised in his rogatory, contrary to what you claimed.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20212 on: August 26, 2026, 10:10:05 PM »
Are you trying to make me cry Spammy?  You?ll have to try a lot harder than that silly little sausage that you are.

No. I'm just pointing out that you haven't read the files. You read the archiving despatch & believed that was evidence.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20213 on: August 26, 2026, 10:11:02 PM »
What evidence don't you trust?

There is evidence via Matt that the alarm may have been raised prior to 10pm.

There is evidence Gerry suggested they split up & search as if she had just wandered off, as per Russells rog, even though Gerry knew Maddie's only means of escape was via the window.

There is evidence Gerry was seen by the Smiths.


Are any of these statements untrue?  Yes/No?
I think you need to learn to read my posts properly.  I didn?t say I didn?t trust the evidence.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20214 on: August 26, 2026, 10:11:47 PM »
He didn?t on the handwritten Timeline nor on the 4th May statement he gave the police.  He never gave a time that the alarm was raised in his rogatory, contrary to what you claimed.

He said Kate left, prior to 10pm. Kate, by her own account, was in the apartment only a matter of seconds = Alarm raised before 10pm.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20215 on: August 26, 2026, 10:14:45 PM »
I think you need to learn to read my posts properly.  I didn?t say I didn?t trust the evidence.

No, that's right. My assessment apparently. Well, my assessment is the evidence, contained within the files. There is evidence alarm before 10pm & evidence Gerry was seen by the Smiths. That's because it is precisely what happened. That's why that evidence exists.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20216 on: August 26, 2026, 10:15:01 PM »
The fact that the McCanns buried the e-fits, Gerry was off searching alone having suggested they split up & search, even though he knew Maddie couldn't have left on her own. That Gerry happened to posses similar trousers to the abductor, & Smithman's Maddie being dressed in the wrong pyjamas. All evidence that support Smith & Wife's belief it was Gerry.
The McCanns did not bury the e-fits.  Gerry searching for his daughter is perfectly reasonable in the circumstances as we can see dozens of people that night did likewise, possessing trousers similar that he wasn?t wearing that night is evidence of nothing, wrong pyjamas is not evidence it was Gerry either,it?s possible evidence it wasn?t Madeleine though.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20217 on: August 26, 2026, 10:16:18 PM »
No you absolutely have not. So not only are you a moron, you are also a liar.
Well if you want this to descend into a child?s playground arguement along these lines again, then I think I may go to bed.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20218 on: August 26, 2026, 10:17:18 PM »
The McCanns did not bury the e-fits. Gerry searching for his daughter is perfectly reasonable in the circumstances as we can see dozens of people that night did likewise, possessing trousers similar that he wasn?t wearing that night is evidence of nothing, wrong pyjamas is not evidence it was Gerry either,it?s possible evidence it wasn?t Madeleine though.

Did you see the e-fits after they were made & before the police released them?
I don't remember seeing them in Kate's book.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #20219 on: August 26, 2026, 10:18:29 PM »


How do you know what trousers Gerry was wearing that night VS?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club