Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3160941 times)

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6360 on: November 07, 2019, 03:55:01 PM »
I tend to agree but for the entirely different reason that the stories and times would not match this attracting even more suspicion their way.

So how would the recon demonstrate innocence... It wouldnt

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6361 on: November 07, 2019, 03:58:31 PM »
Could you explain why they have to demonstrate innocence and what they haven't been cleatred of since they haven't been charged.  They certainly been cleared of arguido status

They claimed to be innocent but failed to demonstrate it when investigated.  In fact. I will go further and say that their actions with conducive with guilt.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Admin

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6362 on: November 07, 2019, 04:08:42 PM »
A reminder to all users that abusive language will attract appropriate sanction.

Offline Erngath

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6363 on: November 07, 2019, 04:20:22 PM »
They claimed to be innocent but failed to demonstrate it when investigated.  In fact. I will go further and say that their actions with conducive with guilt.

I assume this is all in your opinion?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6364 on: November 07, 2019, 04:54:28 PM »
They claimed to be innocent but failed to demonstrate it when investigated.  In fact. I will go further and say that their actions with conducive with guilt.


Indeed Angelo. The most interesting part for me would be GM's visit,already been attempted with a British television show (for your entertainment).  Gerry claims he went into the apartment via one door then changed his mind, Let us say, he was in the apartment for 3/10 mins.as he left he bumped into Jez as he was talking to Jez for a few moments Jane Tanner passes them and sees an abductor. OK the alleged abductor, whilst Gerry is talking to Jez just outside, Jemmies a shutter-opens a window- grabs MBM- leaves without a trace  via the window in a hurry. No one hears a car or van on the road at the same time drive off. So we are to believe Kate N Gerry all this was done within minutes while Gerry was chatting?
Sr Amaral and the PJ just was not buying this and who could blame them. The parents are just upset and humiliated  they were ridiculed as was their story. IMO.

Why did Madeliene not wake up when her warm body was instantly thrust into a very cold night. [Not wearing shoes or a coat or blanket- as observed by the loving mother going to check her sick daughter who was left alone]
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline John

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6365 on: November 07, 2019, 05:31:16 PM »

Indeed Angelo. The most interesting part for me would be GM's visit,already been attempted with a British television show (for your entertainment).  Gerry claims he went into the apartment via one door then changed his mind, Let us say, he was in the apartment for 3/10 mins.as he left he bumped into Jez as he was talking to Jez for a few moments Jane Tanner passes them and sees an abductor. OK the alleged abductor, whilst Gerry is talking to Jez just outside, Jemmies a shutter-opens a window- grabs MBM- leaves without a trace  via the window in a hurry. No one hears a car or van on the road at the same time drive off. So we are to believe Kate N Gerry all this was done within minutes while Gerry was chatting?
Sr Amaral and the PJ just was not buying this and who could blame them. The parents are just upset and humiliated  they were ridiculed as was their story. IMO.

Why did Madeliene not wake up when her warm body was instantly thrust into a very cold night. [Not wearing shoes or a coat or blanket- as observed by the loving mother going to check her sick daughter who was left alone]

There can only be two possibilities to this question. She was already dead or alternatively she was rendered unconscious by some means imo.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6366 on: November 07, 2019, 05:41:59 PM »
No need, as the McCanns were never in prison.

We got to this point many a post ago.
No the McCanns were never in prison.  And your point is...?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6367 on: November 07, 2019, 05:44:42 PM »
I assume this is all in your opinion?
Angelo doesn’t do opinion, he doesn’t have to - he’s a mod, and his word is the law.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6368 on: November 07, 2019, 05:47:00 PM »
There can only be two possibilities to this question. She was already dead or alternatively she was rendered unconscious by some means imo.
There is a third possibility, she just didn’t wake up, unless you can demonstrate that this is impossible then it could have happened that she stirred momentarily and as she had only just been brought outside would not yet have been stirred by the change in temperature.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline John

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6369 on: November 07, 2019, 05:56:15 PM »
There is a third possibility, she just didn’t wake up, unless you can demonstrate that this is impossible then it could have happened that she stirred momentarily and as she had only just been brought outside would not yet have been stirred by the change in temperature.

If I recall correctly, Kate McCann previously stated that Madeleine was a light sleeper and would not have gone off with any stranger.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6370 on: November 07, 2019, 06:01:32 PM »
No the McCanns were never in prison.  And your point is...?

Here we go round the mulberry bush, yet again.

What is spoken in Portuguese prisons has nothing to do with the McCanns.

Is this the third time round, or the fourth time.

The facts don't change because a question is repeated ad nauseam.
What's up, old man?

Offline Erngath

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6371 on: November 07, 2019, 06:04:19 PM »
If I recall correctly, Kate McCann previously stated that Madeleine was a light sleeper and would not have gone off with any stranger.


Parents often believe their child would not go off with a stranger but sadly the child does.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6372 on: November 07, 2019, 06:09:38 PM »
If I recall correctly, Kate McCann previously stated that Madeleine was a light sleeper and would not have gone off with any stranger.
I wasn’t suggesting she went off with a stranger, I’m suggesting she dis not immediately go from fast asleep to wide awake.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6373 on: November 07, 2019, 06:10:43 PM »
Here we go round the mulberry bush, yet again.

What is spoken in Portuguese prisons has nothing to do with the McCanns.

Is this the third time round, or the fourth time.

The facts don't change because a question is repeated ad nauseam.
Then why did you mention the McCanns?  No one had until you did.  Bizarre!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #6374 on: November 07, 2019, 06:28:11 PM »
Then why did you mention the McCanns?  No one had until you did.  Bizarre!

How tiresome.  Brietta talked of prison populations.  I pointed out this had nothing to do with the McCanns.

Care to do another Clari Light and go for round 6?

The forum population fell asleep long ago.   &^^&*
What's up, old man?