Wandering Off Topic

[Miss Taken Identity]

With that in mind I have taken some copies. I'm particularly interested in his most recent post, where he explained in some depth what he means by 'it's done'.

Yes, That was VERY interesting!

As those who dare to question are silenced there is no Justice, and never will be for Madeleine Beth McCann. It is my opinion that this always was and always has been about protecting the parents.

Blacksmith Quote

It's...

...all done. Goncalo Amaral is safe and the facts are now clear to see. The Law can say the rest.



The good news is, if  and BIG IF, he has been CK'd and it does head to court there will be a very willing group ready to set up a  'fund' as was done for Sr Amaral. AND ALSO, the  tapas will have to appear in court to discuss their movements and time lines and ALLA that jazz ALL over again in this country. Very ,very interesting indeed.

For those who will claim the McCanns have won already then please read how libel laws are 'argued' in court in this country. 

[Miss Taken Identity]

There are site's that carry his words surely if he was silenced then those sites would have to take down his posting's.

Yup, but then again... they could claim they are being harassed, and their Human rights are being violated!!
 

[sadie]

Yes, That was VERY interesting!

As those who dare to question are silenced there is no Justice, and never will be for Madeleine Beth McCann. It is my opinion that this always was and always has been about protecting the parents.

Blacksmith Quote

It's...

...all done. Goncalo Amaral is safe and the facts are now clear to see. The Law can say the rest.



The good news is, if  and BIG IF, he has been CK'd and it does head to court there will be a very willing group ready to set up a  'fund' as was done for Sr Amaral. AND ALSO, the  tapas will have to appear in court to discuss their movements and time lines and ALLA that jazz ALL over again in this country. Very ,very interesting indeed.

For those who will claim the McCanns have won already then please read how libel laws are 'argued' in court in this country. 

Well, if he is the man I think he is  ... and I could be wrong, then he has already lost once in Court
And Court warned about what he is saying ....

If Mistaken is not mistaken, seems I have the wrong man in mind and that Blacksmith Smith has not been before the Courts

AIMHO

[Mr Gray]

Yes, That was VERY interesting!

As those who dare to question are silenced there is no Justice, and never will be for Madeleine Beth McCann. It is my opinion that this always was and always has been about protecting the parents.

Blacksmith Quote

It's...

...all done. Goncalo Amaral is safe and the facts are now clear to see. The Law can say the rest.



The good news is, if  and BIG IF, he has been CK'd and it does head to court there will be a very willing group ready to set up a  'fund' as was done for Sr Amaral. AND ALSO, the  tapas will have to appear in court to discuss their movements and time lines and ALLA that jazz ALL over again in this country. Very ,very interesting indeed.

For those who will claim the McCanns have won already then please read how libel laws are 'argued' in court in this country. 

I think it's you who needs to read the libel laws..
I doubt very much the McCann's would have to appear in court

[Miss Taken Identity]

Well, if he is the man I think he is  ... and I could be wrong, then he has already lost once in Court
And Court warned about what he is saying ....

AIMHO

No he is not the man you are thinking of Sadie? to suggest he has been warned by the court is an outrageous lie.

[Mr Gray]

No he is not the man you are thinking of Sadie? to suggest he has been warned by the court is an outrageous lie.

It's not a lie if Sadie thinks it's true ..it may be untrue but not a lie

[Miss Taken Identity]

It's not a lie if Sadie thinks it's true ..it may be untrue but not a lie

 

So, on that note Davel, If I think the parents are lying about that night and what they did,  it could be true!

No problem, happy with that .

oh libel laws... So let's have a wee look at this then shall we. It is up to the plaintif to prove libel. YES PROVE IT.

Antonio  has gone through the Tapas versions of account, he has also discussed at great length the Amaral events

 

[Mr Gray]

So, on that note Davel, If I think the parents are lying about that night and what they did,  it could be true!

No problem, happy with that .

oh libel laws... So let's have a wee look at this then shall we. It is up to the plaintif to prove libel. YES PROVE IT.

Antonio  has gone through the Tapas versions of account, he has also discussed at great length the Amaral events

 This is a guy who knows exactly what he is doing!

When in the near future SY come up with no stranger abductor then....

...

The plaintiff doesn't have to prove it....major error on your behalf...if he thinks that he's wrong too

If BS accuses the McCann's of anything ....he has to prove its true...and the McCann s cannot be forced to answer any questions he raises

[Miss Taken Identity]

And if you say you think they are lying....that would be libel

If I say what I think it would be freedom of speech I am entitled to offer a theory which does not match the McCanns- I think you have been reading them wiki pages...lol

  and soooooooo how confident are you that Antonio cannot prove what he claims ?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Freedom of speech is not freedom to libel in the UK
I'm 100% sure he can't prove anything

Saying you do not believe a persons story is not libel...tsk!
I do not believe in an invisible God-in sky.. libel? nah  just saying like I see it.

[Miss Taken Identity]

once again...if you say you think the mccanns are lying then that is libellous

No, really it isn't! as in really really isn't!

I can say I believe the PJ version of the investigation- Who do not believe an abductor took Maddie.. there ya go   have you got CK phone number? lol

[Mr Gray]

No, really it isn't! as in really really isn't!

I can say I believe the PJ version of the investigation- Who do not believe an abductor took Maddie.. there ya go   have you got CK phone number? lol

yuu havent said that the mccanns are lying..bs did....thats why he can be accused of libel

[sadie]

No, really it isn't! as in really really isn't!

I can say I believe the PJ version of the investigation- Who do not believe an abductor took Maddie.. there ya go   have you got CK phone number? lol

So are you saying that you dont believe the Porto-Special-Madeleine-PJ group?  SY are working with them and all the new analyses and info that they will collectively have.   They must have agreed to Rowley saying what he did, otherwise IMO there would be a big conflict between them

Are you pinning all your faith on Faro / Portimao PJ and Amaral (who is a criminal and found guilty of perjury) lying in the Portuguese Courts?   Pinning all your faith on old stuff from 2007/ 2008 that has been well looked at and maybe found lacking in some areas... then improved on by the addition of further findings.

Do try and see the fact that progress will have been made and that things have moved on.  They are not what they were in 2o07/2008

AIMHO

[G-Unit]

So are you saying that you dont believe the Porto-Special-Madeleine-PJ group?  SY are working with them and all the new analyses and info that they will collectively have.   They must have agreed to Rowley saying what he did, otherwise IMO there would be a big conflict between them

Are you pinning all your faith on Faro / Portimao PJ and Amaral (who is a criminal and found guilty of perjury) lying in the Portuguese Courts?   Pinning all your faith on old stuff from 2007/ 2008 that has been well looked at and maybe found lacking in some areas... then improved on by the addition of further findings.

Do try and see the fact that progress will have been made and that things have moved on.  They are not what they were in 2o07/2008

AIMHO

According to Rowley and Foy, OG looked at the 2007 evidence and decided it was OK to move swiftly on. According to the Portuguese Supreme Court ruling a mere nine months ago the 2007 evidence contained unanswered questions. It is extremely relevant therefore until the answers to those questions are found.

[sadie]

According to Rowley and Foy OG looked at the 2007 evidence and decided it was OK to move swiftly on. According to the Portuguese Supreme Court ruling a mere nine months ago the 2007 evidence contained unanswered questions. It is extremely relevant therefore until the answers to those questions are found.

Thank you for your answer, Gunit, but the post was aimed at Mistaken, who seems to be depending only on things found and thought to be the case in 2007/ 2008.

Several of those thoughts have been proved to be wrong, yet she still clings to them and takes no account of more up to date thoughts and findings.