Wandering Off Topic

[Eleanor]

Would you say 'you and your like' if member of members of your family had extremely indecent pictures blazoned all over their computer.

When the boots on the other foot, there lies a different perspective.

Nesslings actions are inexcusable, along with the judge who FAILED to give him a custodial sentence.

I expect that The Judge had his reasons.  Although no doubt The Judge is far more stupid than you will ever be.

[stephen25000]

I expect that The Judge had his reasons.  Although no doubt The Judge is far more stupid than you will ever be.

...and what of yours ???

[Eleanor]

...and what of yours ???

Forget it, Stephen.  You are wasting your time trying to take the rise out of me.

[stephen25000]

Forget it, Stephen.  You are wasting your time trying to take the rise out of me.

As you are with me.

By the numbers.

[stephen25000]

Forget it, Stephen.  You are wasting your time trying to take the rise out of me.

Also, sarcasm will get you absolutely nowhere with me.

It's  a bit like water off a ducks back.

[G-Unit]

I try not to judge in the light of my own inadequacies.

There's a difference between not judging and sympathising.

[sadie]

Also 'hotrod'.

I have been told his facebook page has been evaporated.

God knows what this has done to his family.

Are you picking on Mloddy now?

What grounds have you for this?

Citation please

[faithlilly]

And I will go on feeling desperately sorry for him.

As you know I don't give Kate McCann much credit for many finer feelings but paedophiles made even her skin crawl.

[stephen25000]

Are you picking on Mloddy now?

What grounds have you for this?

Citation please

What on earth are you on about ?

[Alice Purjorick]

There's a difference between not judging and sympathising.

Funny old subject this with some equally funny views. Funny peculiar that is not funny haha.
It's a bit mealy mouthed on the one hand and a bit cut his goolies off on the other.
According to the NSPCC there are likely to be 7000+ cases similar to this for 2017.
So what is so special about Mr Nessling's case?
Does everyone hold the same view for all the other cases ?

[stephen25000]

Funny old subject this with some equally funny views. Funny peculiar that is not funny haha.
It's a bit mealy mouthed on the one hand and a bit cut his goolies off on the other.
According to the NSPCC there are likely to be 7000+ cases similar to this for 2017.
So what is so special about Mr Nessling's case?
Does everyone hold the same view for all the other cases ?

Well they are all perverts.

They can be chemically castrated.

e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_castration

Oh by the way Alice and anyone reading this thread, just look up on the net, what Nessling and some of his cohorts accused some 'sceptics' of. TRUE IRONY.

[jassi]

Well they are all shittes.

They can be chemically castrated.

e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_castration

There are many ways of abusing children for sexual gratification. Will that remove the urge, or just make them more frustrated?

[stephen25000]

There are many ways of abusing children for sexual gratification. Will that remove the urge, or just make them more frustrated?

You would need to ask an expert in that field that question jassi.

[faithlilly]

You would need to ask an expert in that field that question jassi.

As several supporters think Madeleine was taken by a paedophile it is rather surprising that they are viewing Nessling's actions with such apparent understanding.

[Alice Purjorick]

You would need to ask an expert in that field that question jassi.

The "Mengele Method" just looks like a way of creating another 7000 Euclids. Is the world ready for that?