Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3112210 times)

0 Members and 50 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2700 on: December 16, 2017, 09:34:30 AM »
but it is ruling out the involvement of the parents

I've never seen that in writing,cite?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2701 on: December 16, 2017, 09:37:03 AM »
Rowley also said..

however she left that apartment she was abducted
The parents are not suspects..

so they dont know exactly what happened but the above to facts are true according to rowley

Rowley is giving his opinion, nothing more.

Besides, when has been head of the investigation ?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2702 on: December 16, 2017, 09:40:21 AM »
you forget, stephen, I look at facts.


Now I am not getting into a prolonged slanging match.  With Christmas almost on us I haven't got the time to waste

Well I don't believe your theories, and I am not the only one.

 'globally powerful people'

So Sadie, let's have some proof of this.

You've made the claim and others, time for some cites to back it up.

If you please.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2703 on: December 16, 2017, 09:43:01 AM »
Rowley also said..

however she left that apartment she was abducted
The parents are not suspects..

so they dont know exactly what happened but the above to facts are true according to rowley

What Rowley actually said was that the matter of the parents was dealt with in the initial investigation,you know the one lead by Mr Amaral.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2704 on: December 16, 2017, 09:43:49 AM »
What Rowley actually said was that the matter of the parents was dealt with in the initial investigation,you know the one lead by Mr Amaral.

Exactly.

Not by SY.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2705 on: December 16, 2017, 09:46:27 AM »
Exactly.

Not by SY.

How did  Amaral get it so right one wonders,perhap's he was far better than some detractors wish to admit.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2706 on: December 16, 2017, 09:48:34 AM »
How did  Amaral get it so right one wonders,perhap's he was far better than some detractors wish to admit.

Amaral clearly got athe important details wrong...there is no confirmation of a cadaver in teh apartment as he claimed

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2707 on: December 16, 2017, 09:49:21 AM »
Rowley is giving his opinion, nothing more.

Besides, when has been head of the investigation ?

you were praising his opinions a few posts ago

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2708 on: December 16, 2017, 09:50:23 AM »
What rowleyactually said was...the parents are not suspects and howver maddie left the aprtment she was abducted...he never mentioned amaral who was sacked from the initial investigation

Rowley is not the head of the investigation, and merely reads what he has been told.

He was not there in Portugal in 2007.

Amaral was, along with other members of the PJ.

NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND FOR ABDUCTION.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2709 on: December 16, 2017, 09:52:13 AM »
you were praising his opinions a few posts ago

I pointed out as did Barrier, Rowley doesn't know what happened.

Abduction is an unproven theory and no one has been arrested, for what i think are blatantly obvious reasons.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2710 on: December 16, 2017, 09:53:43 AM »
Amaral clearly got athe important details wrong...there is no confirmation of a cadaver in teh apartment as he claimed

Where is the confirmation of an abductor ?

i.e evidence, let alone proof.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2711 on: December 16, 2017, 09:55:13 AM »
I pointed out as did Barrier, Rowley doesn't know what happened.

Abduction is an unproven theory and no one has been arrested, for what i think are blatantly obvious reasons.


no one has been arrested for blatantly obvious reasons I agree. whan I joined the thread this morning barrier was quoting Rowley and you were agreeing with Barrier...suddenly Rowley views are being down played

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2712 on: December 16, 2017, 09:55:37 AM »
Amaral clearly got athe important details wrong...there is no confirmation of a cadaver in teh apartment as he claimed

Yet in the first judgement which found against Amaral,you know the one you back,the judge states proven facts.

Quote
Taking into account the matter considered undisputed in the selection of facts and the decision handed down in due course after producing the matter of evidence and discussing the case, the following facts are demonstrated :

Quote
6. The British police dogs “Eddie” and “Keela” detected human blood and cadaver in the apartment 5A, Ocean Club [alínea AR) of the undisputed facts].
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2713 on: December 16, 2017, 09:56:14 AM »
amaral was sacked from the investigation and the evidence he based his thesis on has been debunked#

Accidental death has not been debunked davel, or proved.

Neither has abduction, one way or the other.

Keep to facts.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2714 on: December 16, 2017, 09:56:27 AM »
Where is the confirmation of an abductor ?

i.e evidence, let alone proof.

We have been through all this before and Im not going to get involved in petty arguments...Redwood said...based on teh evidence we believe maddie was abducted