Wandering Off Topic

[Eleanor]

If you google 'Madeleine McCann forums' the Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann is always on the first page, along with their Facebook page. That's because it's the foremost forum on the subject. As such, it's worth reading what they have to say, so yes, a useful source of info imo. Even those here who disagree with what the people there say are reading what they say nevertheless. Some even post there.

Not if they are McCann Supporters they don't.  It's not allowed.

[Mr Gray]

This from the man who compares the abilities of cadaver dogs to those of Mystic Meg.

You dont seem to understand what I said...or perhaps you are just being facetious. In reality I have a far better understanding of the alerts than any sceptic...IMO

[Eleanor]

I've just accessed CMoMM for the first time in a year.  It's still very boring and totally illogical.  A bunch of nutters no less.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you google 'Madeleine McCann forums' the Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann is always on the first page, along with their Facebook page. That's because it's the foremost forum on the subject. As such, it's worth reading what they have to say, so yes, a useful source of info imo. Even those here who disagree with what the people there say are reading what they say nevertheless. Some even post there.

This is really no great recommendation.  Google anything - moon landings, holocaust, Sandy Hook, 9/11 and put "forum" after the subject and the top of the first page will bring you to the most popular of the bonkers conspiracy websites pertaining to each.  You think these are useful tools?  Only if you want to marvel at the way the conspiracy theorist's mind works.

[The General]

You dont seem to understand what I said...or perhaps you are just being facetious. In reality I have a far better understanding of the alerts than any sceptic...IMO

You can't even define 'sceptic', never mind grasp the basics of the alerts. That's not an opinion, that's a fact.
I've proven beyond doubt with Cassella's most recent work that cadaver dogs are a useful tool when searching for vestiges of cadaverine. He endorses their use and includes the results in his theses.

[Mr Gray]

You can't even define 'sceptic', never mind grasp the basics of the alerts. That's not an opinion, that's a fact.
I've proven beyond doubt with Cassella's most recent work that cadaver dogs are a useful tool when searching for vestiges of cadaverine. He endorses their use and includes the results in his theses.

They are a very useful tool in searching for cadaverine...the fact you don't realise I support that shows how little you understand my views on the dogs.

The Germans it seems used cadaver dogs in the allotment search...
Yet are prepared to ignore Eddies alerts...I totally understand the logic of that...I doubt you do

[The General]

They are a very useful tool in searching for cadaverine...the fact you don't realise I support that shows how little you understand my views on the dogs.

The Germans it seems used cadaver dogs in the allotment search...
Yet are prepared to ignore Eddies alerts...I totally understand the logic of that...I doubt you do

You have just provided your opinion of the machinations of the German police and passed it off as some quasi-fact, then attempted to reason that you understand the logic of this 'fact' that you just contrived, whilst simultaneously suggesting that my grasp of your 'logic' is limited.
You got the last bit right, granted, it's difficult to understand the manufactured logic of a man groping around in the dark searching for recognition of his intellect.

[Vertigo Swirl]

^^^When you can't argue the point, hurl insults at all and sundry, that's bound to win a few likes from the fan club, if nothing else.

[G-Unit]

I accept anything supported by sufficient evidence...

Until Wolters says he has evidence, then you are prepared to just believe.

[G-Unit]

Not if they are McCann Supporters they don't.  It's not allowed.

Well I know at least one who's sneaked in there, ignoring your rules.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Until Wolters says he has evidence, then you are prepared to just believe.

If the German prosecutor says he has evidence then that is evidence that he has evidence.

[Mr Gray]

You have just provided your opinion of the machinations of the German police and passed it off as some quasi-fact, then attempted to reason that you understand the logic of this 'fact' that you just contrived, whilst simultaneously suggesting that my grasp of your 'logic' is limited.
You got the last bit right, granted, it's difficult to understand the manufactured logic of a man groping around in the dark searching for recognition of his intellect.

Total nonsense...from start to finish

[G-Unit]

If the German prosecutor says he has evidence then that is evidence that he has evidence.

It's evidence that he thinks he has evidence. Not sufficient to charge his suspect though, as he has also admitted.

[Mr Gray]

Until Wolters says he has evidence, then you are prepared to just believe.

I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume HCW has evidence if he says he has.... particularly what he has said and the circumstances in which he has said them.
You on the other hand disbelieve on the basis it doesn't fit your agenda...we will soon see who is right.

[G-Unit]

I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume HCW has evidence if he says he has.... particularly what he has said and the circumstances in which he has said them.
You on the other hand disbelieve on the basis it doesn't fit your agenda...we will soon see who is right.

In other words you are prepared to believe what Wolters says. I neither believe or disbelieve him, and until he gets enough to charge his suspect it's immaterial.