Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3034327 times)

0 Members and 44 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8805 on: October 24, 2020, 09:26:00 PM »
Speculation lol..why should he. He has all the time in the world

Does he? In the rape case Wolters said;

23:15
"In this case there is an arrest warrant for him so he will stay in prison until the verdict is legally binding"

So the conviction for rape isn't finalised it seems.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8806 on: October 24, 2020, 09:31:06 PM »
Wolters never named CB..fact. he let others do that including Amaral and FF

I'm sure HCW understands German law

I didn’t say Wolter named Brueckner, I said he started the ball rolling and the media did the rest. Brueckner’s name was out there before Amaral used it.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Anthro

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8807 on: October 24, 2020, 11:07:38 PM »

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8808 on: October 24, 2020, 11:13:31 PM »
I didn’t say Wolter named Brueckner, I said he started the ball rolling and the media did the rest. Brueckner’s name was out there before Amaral used it.

Amaral released information in the Australian podcast which led directly to Brueckner's identification.  Deny it all you like but that is the fact of the matter
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8809 on: October 24, 2020, 11:50:07 PM »
Amaral released information in the Australian podcast which led directly to Brueckner's identification.  Deny it all you like but that is the fact of the matter

Repeating it doesn’t make it any truer.

There was 15 months between Amaral speaking about a German scapegoat and Brueckner being named. Brueckner’s name wasn’t mentioned until after Wolter’s appeal for information, 15 months after MS’s podcast and after the media had used the information released by Wolter to find out his name.

I’m really not sure why you’re flogging this dead horse but I do wish you’d stop...you are convincing no one.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Erngath

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8810 on: October 24, 2020, 11:54:50 PM »
Repeating it doesn’t make it any truer.

There was 15 months between Amaral speaking about a German scapegoat and Brueckner being named. Brueckner’s name wasn’t mentioned until after Wolter’s appeal for information, 15 months after MS’s podcast and after the media had used the information released by Wolter to find out his name.

I’m really not sure why you’re flogging this dead horse but I do wish you’d stop...you are convincing no one.
!


In your own opinion of course.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8811 on: October 25, 2020, 12:03:34 AM »
!


In your own opinion of course.

No, my post is based on facts.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8812 on: October 25, 2020, 12:18:02 AM »
Repeating it doesn’t make it any truer.

There was 15 months between Amaral speaking about a German scapegoat and Brueckner being named. Brueckner’s name wasn’t mentioned until after Wolter’s appeal for information, 15 months after MS’s podcast and after the media had used the information released by Wolter to find out his name.

I’m really not sure why you’re flogging this dead horse but I do wish you’d stop...you are convincing no one.

Long before we heard Brueckner's name or knew the German police suspected him in Madeleine's disappearance Amaral was scuttling from Podcast to TV Studio to make sure he got his message across.

It is a fact he did so the only puzzlement is WHY he did so.

Snip
By GERARD COUZENS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 14:46, 30 November 2019

The ex-cop sparked speculation Hamburg-born child strangler Ney was the prime suspect after telling an Australian podcast earlier this year investigators were focusing on a German paedophile in prison.

He failed to identify Ney by name at the time, describing the suspect only as someone who had been ruled out of the investigation into the missing British youngster in 2008 but later jailed in his home country.

Now Amaral, the original lead investigator in the case, has fuelled new speculation about his identity by telling a Spanish TV programme: 'A paedophile who is German and serving life for killing children has been spoken about.
'What I know is that the suspect is not him, it's another man. He's also in prison in Germany. He's also a paedophile.
'Years later, many years later, it appears that in an Internet chatroom there is a conversation between that person and another person where they talk about Madeleine.'

He responded: 'It can't be him' when he was shown a photo of Ney before adding in a false and vile jibe at Madeleine McCann's father: 'I'll say something else, the kidnapper is similar, very similar, to Gerry McCann' before pointing at the photo he had been shown of Martin Ney and adding: 'That man is not similar to Gerry McCann.'
Martin Ney's name emerged after Mr Amaral told an Australian podcast: 'They are preparing the end of the investigation, with a German paedophile who is in prison right now.

'I don't know how they will start it, but that will be the big ending, if it ends.'

He did not identify the mystery German at the time, although Correio da Manha went on to claim Ney was not the suspect. 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7741505/Ex-Portuguese-police-chief-claims-leading-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-mystery-German-paedophile.html
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8813 on: October 25, 2020, 12:29:54 AM »
Long before we heard Brueckner's name or knew the German police suspected him in Madeleine's disappearance Amaral was scuttling from Podcast to TV Studio to make sure he got his message across.

It is a fact he did so the only puzzlement is WHY he did so.

Snip
By GERARD COUZENS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 14:46, 30 November 2019

The ex-cop sparked speculation Hamburg-born child strangler Ney was the prime suspect after telling an Australian podcast earlier this year investigators were focusing on a German paedophile in prison.

He failed to identify Ney by name at the time, describing the suspect only as someone who had been ruled out of the investigation into the missing British youngster in 2008 but later jailed in his home country.

Now Amaral, the original lead investigator in the case, has fuelled new speculation about his identity by telling a Spanish TV programme: 'A paedophile who is German and serving life for killing children has been spoken about.
'What I know is that the suspect is not him, it's another man. He's also in prison in Germany. He's also a paedophile.
'Years later, many years later, it appears that in an Internet chatroom there is a conversation between that person and another person where they talk about Madeleine.'

He responded: 'It can't be him' when he was shown a photo of Ney before adding in a false and vile jibe at Madeleine McCann's father: 'I'll say something else, the kidnapper is similar, very similar, to Gerry McCann' before pointing at the photo he had been shown of Martin Ney and adding: 'That man is not similar to Gerry McCann.'
Martin Ney's name emerged after Mr Amaral told an Australian podcast: 'They are preparing the end of the investigation, with a German paedophile who is in prison right now.

'I don't know how they will start it, but that will be the big ending, if it ends.'

He did not identify the mystery German at the time, although Correio da Manha went on to claim Ney was not the suspect. 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7741505/Ex-Portuguese-police-chief-claims-leading-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-mystery-German-paedophile.html

Yes I read that earlier.

November 2019 and it took the world’s media another 7 months to name Bruckner....and coincidentally after Wolter had provided them with ample information to identify him.

Wolter gave the media all they needed to identify Bruckner. It had nothing to do with Amaral.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8814 on: October 25, 2020, 12:54:36 AM »
Yes I read that earlier.

November 2019 and it took the world’s media another 7 months to name Bruckner....and coincidentally after Wolter had provided them with ample information to identify him.

Wolter gave the media all they needed to identify Bruckner. It had nothing to do with Amaral.

The evidence is there.  Why doesn't it surprise me you are in denial.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8815 on: October 25, 2020, 01:07:32 AM »
The evidence is there.  Why doesn't it surprise me you are in denial.

The evidence isn’t there and I’m afraid you are wrong.

It was 15 months after Amaral’s interview that Bruckner was identified by the media, and only after Wolter had given them many more clues to his identity.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8816 on: October 25, 2020, 07:30:52 AM »
Does he? In the rape case Wolters said;

23:15
"In this case there is an arrest warrant for him so he will stay in prison until the verdict is legally binding"

So the conviction for rape isn't finalised it seems.
This interview was on 4th July....in August there was a ruling upholding the conviction so it seems you are wrong

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8817 on: October 25, 2020, 07:38:13 AM »
This interview was on 4th July....in August there was a ruling upholding the conviction so it seems you are wrong

Do you mean the ruling from the ECJ?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8818 on: October 25, 2020, 07:41:55 AM »
Do you mean the ruling from the ECJ?

You should be aware that s lot has happened since July 4...it seems his bid was rejected at the end of September
« Last Edit: October 25, 2020, 07:57:00 AM by Davel »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

"You can't reason with the unreasonable".