Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

You see that is why your posts are so Gullible.

The PJ accepted that Gerry was at the Tapas restaurant at the time of the Smith sighting so I guess that makes them gullible old women too, bless them.

[kizzy]

He was wearing jeans when they did the appeal.  I can't imagine Gerry saying 'oh hang on I need to change my trousers'

Ye right...they get showered and then put on sloppy tee-shirts hoody's etc  to go out to dinner ,,,don't think so.

They will have got changed it was 24 hours later when they did 1st appeal.....keep up don't just assume everything.

That has no proof whatsoever ...gmc was wearing jeans ....apart from 4 year later when she wrote the book.

[Wonderfulspam]

I've been following this case for 18 years and I swear to God in all that time (until now) it was all about the dogs and Smith's 60-80% pronouncement.  The buttons barely got a mention.  Now all of a sudden the whole case appears to pivot on a couple of tiny beige buttons that Aiofe may or may not have recalled, three weeks after she may or may not have seen them.  It's laughably ridiculous it really is, but do carry on, it's fascinating watching the manic obsessing over a couple of buttons.

Yes & it's only a matter of time before the police catch the Gerrylike trousers pyjama change paedo. Or trace the innocent Gerrylike trousers Maddie clone father. Then we can be certain the obvious isn't the obvious.

[Wonderfulspam]

The PJ accepted that Gerry was at the Tapas restaurant at the time of the Smith sighting so I guess that makes them gullible old women too, bless them.

They were definitely Gullible. They initially believed the McCanns. And you've got to be pretty special to believe the McCanns really.

[Joe Blogs]

Yes. That's what the Gerrylike trousers pyjamas conundrum proves really. It's too far fetched to be reasonably possibly true. Therefore the truth is obvious, provided you're not a gullible old woman.

Ha ha! Well i'm certainly not a gullible old woman, Spam!
A gullible old man maybe, if you think 59 is old, that is?

[Wonderfulspam]

Ha ha! Well i'm certainly not a gullible old woman, Spam!
A gullible old man maybe, if you think 59 is old, that is?

You're old enough to be my dad.

[kizzy]

The PJ accepted that Gerry was at the Tapas restaurant at the time of the Smith sighting so I guess that makes them gullible old women too, bless them.

The PJ accepted that Gerry was at the Tapas restaurant at the time of the Smith sighting so

No...wrong.

If that  was the case why was G,A, in the middle of bringing the Smiths back for a recon...

Yet didnt happen because he got took off the case...Seems by then UK pressure was at its finest.

[Joe Blogs]

You're old enough to be my dad.

Oh well! I'm still 16 at heart, Spam!

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh well! I'm still 16 at heart, Spam!

I actually assumed you were a woman. Something to do with the writing style & exclamation marks. Not sure why exactly but I thought you were female.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Ha ha! Well i'm certainly not a gullible old woman, Spam!
A gullible old man maybe, if you think 59 is old, that is?

You actually can disregard everything the McCanns have said and done and still come to the conclusion that Madeleine was abducted, it's nothing to do with being gullible but about
1)assessing the evidence objectively (which includes considering how reliable eye witness evidence that is given weeks and months after the event can be)
2) not dismissing 95% of the witness testimony of those questioned the day or two after the event (when memories were fresh) in order to make your theory work
3) not being a curly-wurly-woo conspiracy theorist with a button and little girl's pyjama sleeve fetish.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The PJ accepted that Gerry was at the Tapas restaurant at the time of the Smith sighting so

No...wrong.

If that  was the case why was G,A, in the middle of bringing the Smiths back for a recon...

Yet didnt happen because he got took off the case...Seems by then UK pressure was at its finest.

No, I'm not wrong.  Goncalo Amaral was not the only member of the PJ investigating this case, and as I recall the PJ's final word on the matter (as recorded in their report when the McCanns were cleared of suspicion) was that Gerry was at the Tapas Bar at the time of the Smith sighting.  Obviously they were a bunch of gullible old ladies!

[Wonderfulspam]

You actually can disregard everything the McCanns have said and done and still come to the conclusion that Madeleine was abducted, it's nothing to do with being gullible but about
1)assessing the evidence objectively (which includes considering how reliable eye witness evidence that is given weeks and months after the event can be)
2) not dismissing 95% of the witness testimony of those questioned the day or two after the event (when memories were fresh) in order to make your theory work
3) not being a curly-wurly-woo conspiracy theorist with a button and little girl's pyjama sleeve fetish.

Make your theory fit the evidence. The evidence being the Smith sighting. Can you manage that without me being able to take the piss out of you? No you can't, and that's because its obvious Gerry was seen by the Smiths. Not the pyjama change paedo, innocent Gerrylike man, or Brueckner for that matter. No. The simplest & most likely explanation is that the McCanns did it.

[Eleanor]

Make your theory fit the evidence. The evidence being the Smith sighting. Can you manage that without me being able to take the piss out of you? No you can't, and that's because its obvious Gerry was seen by the Smiths. Not the pyjama change paedo, innocent Gerrylike man, or Brueckner for that matter. No. The simplest & most likely explanation is that the McCanns did it.

Or you aren't right in the head.  But that goes without saying.

[Wonderfulspam]

Or you aren't right in the head.  But that goes without saying.

I'm just following the evidence, & it doesn't lead to Brueckner.

[kizzy]

No, I'm not wrong.  Goncalo Amaral was not the only member of the PJ investigating this case, and as I recall the PJ's final word on the matter (as recorded in their report when the McCanns were cleared of suspicion) was that Gerry was at the Tapas Bar at the time of the Smith sighting.  Obviously they were a bunch of gullible old ladies!

I think you will find the tannerman sighting was more favourable with the egg face description.

Remember the efits the Smiths did.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/Madeleine.McCann.Info.Group/posts/24265774873019709/


An E-Fit Created: It was not until October 2013, when the files were reviewed by the London Metropolitan Police (Operation Grange), that a formal e-fit (facial composite) of the man described by the Smiths was released to the public.

Significance: While the Smiths were certain of what they saw, some interpretations of the PJ files suggested the timing might have conflicted with other witnessed events. However, many consider it one of the most credible independent sightings of a potential suspect.