Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

Not much I suppose if the open window is ruled out! just the McCanns word for it really!

Finally. Yes. All there is, is Mr coincidental button trousers & wife's word for it. Extraordinary that the police have never added any meat to the bones of their claim. Despite apparently having some.

[Wonderfulspam]

So, we just have to take the McCanns word for it, & Redwoods word for it, & Wolters word for it. Because there really is b....r all evidence of abduction to be seen. Apart from the sighting of Gerry abducting Maddie.

[Wonderfulspam]

So I guess, with all of this said. We've just got to wait patiently & peacefully for the three expert investigative forces to prove that The McCanns didn't do it. It shouldn't be much longer now.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It?s patently evident that after many years this case has driven some of its followers quite crazy.   There are of course several high profile cases in which there is no physical evidence of abduction but abduction remains the only logical explanation.  Claudia Lawrence is one example (though one member of this forum recently claimed that the absence of evidence of abduction in this case proves she wasn?t abducted - cuckoo!))
 
The Met who hoped for a breakthrough in this case when they prominently featured Smithman on the Crimewatch programme have been clear that in their opinion that Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger.  They must have reached this conclusion by doing some research and giving the matter a bit of thought when they reviewed the case, unless of course the members of Operation Grange are all gullible and mentally retarded old women like me.  In which case it?s about time the WUM put them right and bullied them into taking his theory seriously.  His failure to do so is a serious dereliction of duty to the cause of Justice 4 Maddie IMO.

[Wonderfulspam]

It?s patently evident that after many years this case has driven some of its followers quite crazy.   There are of course several high profile cases in which there is no physical evidence of abduction but abduction remains the only logical explanation.  Claudia Lawrence is one example (though one member of this forum recently claimed that the absence of evidence of abduction in this case proves she wasn?t abducted - cuckoo!))
 
The Met who hoped for a breakthrough in this case when they prominently featured Smithman on the Crimewatch programme have been clear that in their opinion that Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger.  They must have reached this conclusion by doing some research and giving the matter a bit of thought when they reviewed the case, unless of course the members of Operation Grange are all gullible and mentally retarded old women like me.  In which case it?s about time the WUM put them right and bullied them into taking his theory seriously.  His failure to do so is a serious dereliction of duty to the cause of Justice 4 Maddie IMO.

Nice appeal to authority there. However I don't believe Claudia Lawrence father was seen abducting her though. Strangely enough. No. But in this case, Gerrylike man was seen, in his coincidental trousers, carrying a stiff Maddie in the wrong pyjamas, off into the night, never to be seen again, at roughly around the same time Gerry was out searching alone.
So obviously, Brueckner must have done it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger, so she was. Redwood said so & Wolters said so & the McCanns said so. That appears to be enough to convince McCann supporters. They don't need anything else. Y'know like, evidence.

[Wonderfulspam]

Poor old VS is feeling bullied by me for exposing the paucity of evidence Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger. Or rather the total absence of it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway, what did Mark Rowley have to say about the issue? They were happy that the issue of the parents had been dealt with by the original investigation. Which was the investigation that couldn't rule the McCanns out. No, however she left the apartment, she was abducted, he said. Amazing detective work by the world's finest police force.

[Wonderfulspam]

Edited.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only five sarky rants in response to my last post, he?s beginning to cool off folks!

[Eleanor]

One VS post triggers 6 WUM rants. LOL.
[/quote

Getting desperate by the sound of it all.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Getting desperate by the sound of it all.

It does sound that way doesn?t it?  48 ranty posts yesterday, most of them complaining about me and what I?ve written does begin to sound a bit obsessive. 
Anyway, Spam complains about me appealing to authority but that?s only because he has absolutely no authority to appeal to.  No one in any credible position of authority is having any part of his idiotic notions.  Having said that he did appeal to authority recently when he wrote ? SY clearly didn't regard the Smiths as unreliable witnesses?, so once again double standards from the Spammer.

[Wonderfulspam]

It does sound that way doesn?t it?  48 ranty posts yesterday, most of them complaining about me and what I?ve written does begin to sound a bit obsessive. 
Anyway, Spam complains about me appealing to authority but that?s only because he has absolutely no authority to appeal to.  No one in any credible position of authority is having any part of his idiotic notions.  Having said that he did appeal to authority recently when he wrote ? SY clearly didn't regard the Smiths as unreliable witnesses?, so once again double standards from the Spammer.

So I in fact do have an authority to appeal to. The Smith family evidence as supported by Crimewatch. We've just got to wait now for Wolters new revised edition where Brueckner is shown changing Maddies pyjamas & carrying her past the Smiths.

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh that's a shame. My slut shaming post about Claudia Lawrence taste in married men has disappeared.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Spam?s authority reckons Madeleine was abducted by a stranger - you gotta laff!