Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2574237 times)

0 Members and 212 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19395 on: July 17, 2026, 11:18:50 PM »

IIRC, either Sheila went crazy with the gun & despite her small stature managed to physically over power the much taller stronger Neville, if we take Bamber at his word, & if that didn't happen then Bamber must be guilty. I don't really buy the going crazy with the gun theory so I get the impression it must have been Bamber.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19396 on: July 17, 2026, 11:33:53 PM »
IIRC, either Sheila went crazy with the gun & despite her small stature managed to physically over power the much taller stronger Neville, if we take Bamber at his word, & if that didn't happen then Bamber must be guilty. I don't really buy the going crazy with the gun theory so I get the impression it must have been Bamber.
Except that I agree with you which means you now need to take the opposite view, because I?m a gullible moron who believes the McCanns.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19397 on: July 17, 2026, 11:41:27 PM »
Except that I agree with you which means you now need to take the opposite view, because I?m a gullible moron who believes the McCanns.

We have agreed on other things before. I remember we agreed that the hysterical public mourning of Sarah Everard by hundreds of people who never knew her was a bit ridiculous & we also agreed that pinning the fentanyl addict to the floor with a knee on his neck for 9mins as he pleaded for it to stop was quite unreasonable also. But in such instances where we do agree on matters I have to take several long hot showers after.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19398 on: July 17, 2026, 11:55:28 PM »
I've never really read much about or taken an interest in either case tbh so I really can't say but I do get the feel from everything I read that Bamber is guilty.
Ah! I just thought you could side with Vertigo for a change if you thought they were guilty like her, Spam!
Are there any other cases you have an opinion about?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19399 on: July 18, 2026, 12:22:11 AM »
Ah! I just thought you could side with Vertigo for a change if you thought they were guilty like her, Spam!
Are there any other cases you have an opinion about?

I'm unsure about the conviction of Michael Stone since there is no direct evidence or any tangible evidence he is actually guilty. But I'm not convinced Levi Belfield did it either as his wife has given him an alibi & Belfield has messed around claiming to be guilty with unconvincing confessions.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19400 on: July 18, 2026, 12:44:11 AM »
I'm unsure about the conviction of Michael Stone since there is no direct evidence or any tangible evidence he is actually guilty. But I'm not convinced Levi Belfield did it either as his wife has given him an alibi & Belfield has messed around claiming to be guilty with unconvincing confessions.
I haven't looked into any of those cases, Spam!
All i've looked at is-
Bamber-innocent.
Luke Mitchell-innocent.
Lucy Letby-not sure, but most likely guilty.
The McCanns-still on the fence i'm afraid!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19401 on: July 18, 2026, 07:04:53 AM »
I haven't looked into any of those cases, Spam!
All i've looked at is-
Bamber-innocent.
Luke Mitchell-innocent.
Lucy Letby-not sure, but most likely guilty.
The McCanns-still on the fence i'm afraid!
IMO
Michael Stone - likely innocent
Bamber - guilty
Mitchell - on the fence but a little scrote either way
Letby - erring towards innocent
McCanns - innocent
Bruckner (for the abduction and murder of Madeleine) - erring towards guilty.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2026, 07:09:35 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19402 on: July 18, 2026, 07:06:43 AM »
We have agreed on other things before. I remember we agreed that the hysterical public mourning of Sarah Everard by hundreds of people who never knew her was a bit ridiculous & we also agreed that pinning the fentanyl addict to the floor with a knee on his neck for 9mins as he pleaded for it to stop was quite unreasonable also. But in such instances where we do agree on matters I have to take several long hot showers after.
No you don?t, you have to take cold showers because it gets you stimulated.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19403 on: July 18, 2026, 12:01:39 PM »
I'm unsure about the conviction of Michael Stone since there is no direct evidence or any tangible evidence he is actually guilty. But I'm not convinced Levi Belfield did it either as his wife has given him an alibi & Belfield has messed around claiming to be guilty with unconvincing confessions.

So you are unsure about the conviction of Michael Stone.  Yet if you had your way he wouldn't be around today as he would have been given a lethal injection.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19404 on: July 18, 2026, 01:27:30 PM »
So you are unsure about the conviction of Michael Stone.  Yet if you had your way he wouldn't be around today as he would have been given a lethal injection.

I very clearly stated that capital punishment should require direct evidence, ie dna, cctv & other forensics which leave absolutely no room for doubt.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19405 on: July 18, 2026, 01:47:03 PM »

So anyway. What we appear to have established is that McCann supporters here care more about the human rights of the child murdering rapists than I do. I believe child murdering rapists should be sentenced to a swift & painless death. The Women folk here prefer it when the child murdering rapist gets to live in a nice warm prison with all their food, water, energy, healthcare & activities funded by the taxpayer for the remainder of their natural lives. So despite Me being accused of being a paedo sympathiser all these years, it is in fact the Women McCann supporters here that support the rights of the child murdering rapist a great deal more than I do. I'm glad we finally cleared that up.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19406 on: July 18, 2026, 01:56:04 PM »

Correction. VS has said she likes it when the child murdering rapist is brutally, painfully & inhumanely tortured to death. Eleanor would consider this barbaric, as she believes that killing is always wrong. But she has since kept very quiet about her views on abortion, assisted dying & the right to use lethal force in self defence.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19407 on: July 18, 2026, 01:57:30 PM »
IMO
Michael Stone - likely innocent
Bamber - guilty
Mitchell - on the fence but a little scrote either way
Letby - erring towards innocent
McCanns - innocent
Bruckner (for the abduction and murder of Madeleine) - erring towards guilty.
Thanks, Vertigo!

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19408 on: July 18, 2026, 03:29:08 PM »

I believe that Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #19409 on: July 18, 2026, 03:42:01 PM »
I believe that Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

Great, but what are your opinions on abortion, assisted dying & self defence, Eleanor? Would you now concede that killing is indeed acceptable in certain circumstances? Or are you standing by what you said & we need to ban all these things?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club