Author Topic: Likes  (Read 108288 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Erngath

Re: Likes
« Reply #75 on: September 01, 2018, 11:38:47 AM »
Perhaps I misread your post Erngath. It was the use of the word "our" to Vertigo Swirl.

I believe you did.
He is our( Scotland's) national bard.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Erngath

Re: Likes
« Reply #76 on: September 01, 2018, 11:41:13 AM »
Erngath I have a guilty secret. I actually like Robbie Burns (well some of it) and I am not Scottish.


I like some of it, not all of it.
Certainly not The Cotter's Saturday night.
We had to study Burns at school and I hated that one.
Although I did win the Burns prize, says she immodestly.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Sunny

Re: Likes
« Reply #77 on: September 01, 2018, 12:19:29 PM »

I like some of it, not all of it.
Certainly not The Cotter's Saturday night.
We had to study Burns at school and I hated that one.
Although I did win the Burns prize, says she immodestly.

Looks like we are in agreement on at least something Erngath. And a belated congratulations on receiving the Burns prize. 8@??)(
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Erngath

Re: Likes
« Reply #78 on: September 01, 2018, 01:11:10 PM »
Looks like we are in agreement on at least something Erngath. And a belated congratulations on receiving the Burns prize. 8@??)(

Thank you.
I don't believe I have won a prize since and that was nearly sxty years ago.  @)(++(*
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Likes
« Reply #79 on: September 01, 2018, 06:08:32 PM »
I'll forgive your remark about our national bard. 8)><(
I hadn't realised just how unpopular you are with the sceptics. 8(8-))
Must be touching a few nerves somewhere.
Keep up the good work. 8((()*/
Sorry, I’m not keen on poetry generally, unless it’s John Cooper Clarke or Ian Dury.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Likes
« Reply #80 on: September 01, 2018, 06:33:35 PM »
Is Robbie Burns the national bard of the English too Erngath? I never knew that.


Back on to my earlier post I see Slartibart's post has 10 likes and Eleanor's has 9. Eleanor's post is still down as the most liked post.

IMO neither post is amazing or particularly thought provoking but it is disappointing that the most liked message on here is actually NOT the most liked post.  Perhaps John could look into it.
Why are you disappointed by this?  Do you not have more important concerns in life than this, really? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Sunny

Re: Likes
« Reply #81 on: September 01, 2018, 10:02:27 PM »
Why are you disappointed by this?  Do you not have more important concerns in life than this, really?

Of course I do. That is why I am not here 24/7 I do have a life Vertigo Swirl.  Am I not allowed to be a little bit disappointed that the proclaimed most popular message is not actually the real most popular message.

If the situation was reversed and a sceptic post was proclaimed most popular when a supporter one was really the most popular would you not be disappointed too?

Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Likes
« Reply #82 on: September 01, 2018, 10:42:04 PM »
Of course I do. That is why I am not here 24/7 I do have a life Vertigo Swirl.  Am I not allowed to be a little bit disappointed that the proclaimed most popular message is not actually the real most popular message.

If the situation was reversed and a sceptic post was proclaimed most popular when a supporter one was really the most popular would you not be disappointed too?
LOL, are you kidding?  Disappointed?!  No, I left the playground a long time ago.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Sunny

Re: Likes
« Reply #83 on: September 01, 2018, 10:46:33 PM »
LOL, are you kidding?  Disappointed?!  No, I left the playground a long time ago.

Not so long ago sometimes it seems, Vertigo Swirl. Being disappointed has nothing to do with childishness nor immaturity as any adult would know.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Erngath

Re: Likes
« Reply #84 on: September 02, 2018, 12:59:42 AM »
Of course I do. That is why I am not here 24/7 I do have a life Vertigo Swirl.  Am I not allowed to be a little bit disappointed that the proclaimed most popular message is not actually the real most popular message.

If the situation was reversed and a sceptic post was proclaimed most popular when a supporter one was really the most popular would you not be disappointed too?

I doubt any supporter would give a tinker's curse about who had the most likes
Seriously when discussing the case of a missing child is this really a cause for concern.??
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Sunny

Re: Likes
« Reply #85 on: September 02, 2018, 10:03:38 AM »
I doubt any supporter would give a tinker's curse about who had the most likes
Seriously when discussing the case of a missing child is this really a cause for concern.??

One clearly did as since I made my original post regarding Eleanor's 8 likes and Slartibartfast's 9 likes a supporter has liked Eleanor's post making it 9 too.  Slartibartfast now has 10 likes though.

It is not a cause for concern just something I was a bit disappointed to see.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Erngath

Re: Likes
« Reply #86 on: September 02, 2018, 10:24:53 AM »
One clearly did as since I made my original post regarding Eleanor's 8 likes and Slartibartfast's 9 likes a supporter has liked Eleanor's post making it 9 too.  Slartibartfast now has 10 likes though.

It is not a cause for concern just something I was a bit disappointed to see.


It's puzzling why a post which contributes zero to the thread and which is a rather sarcastic and disparaging  comment about another poster should be given so many likes.
I'm surprised you want such a post recognised as having the most likes and therefore the "best"??post on the forum.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2018, 10:38:47 AM by Erngath »
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Sunny

Re: Likes
« Reply #87 on: September 02, 2018, 10:42:48 AM »

It's puzzling why a post which contributes zero to the thread and which is a rather sarcastic and disparaging  comment about another poster should be given so many likes.
I'm surprised you want such a post recognised as having the most likes and therefore the "best"??post on the forum.

I suggest you re read Eleanor's post that you have liked and tell me what this post contributes to it's thread if you could please Erngath.

IMO neither post is noteworthy in itself and probably do not warrant the most liked accolade here but perhaps that is how this forum's "likes" work. People of course will like what they want  IMO
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Erngath

Re: Likes
« Reply #88 on: September 02, 2018, 11:01:16 AM »
I suggest you re read Eleanor's post that you have liked and tell me what this post contributes to it's thread if you could please Erngath.

IMO neither post is noteworthy in itself and probably do not warrant the most liked accolade here but perhaps that is how this forum's "likes" work. People of course will like what they want  IMO

Eleanor's post is on topic, does contribute to the thread and most certainly is not a personal insult to a fellow forum member.
All in my opinion.
I suggest you contact John about this grave injustice to Slartis post and I'm sure he will alter the statistics to show hat Slartis post is recognised as the one with the most likes.

Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Sunny

Re: Likes
« Reply #89 on: September 02, 2018, 01:46:58 PM »
Just forget it Erngath. I made one post as there was a discrepancy on the most liked post and have had you and Vertigo Swirl badgering me for days.

Perhaps you should look to yourself as to why you seem to care so much about what I consider "disappointing"
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!