A Good Judge of Character ?

[G-Unit]

In the McCanns v Leicester Constabulary she spoke in support of people who were, at the time, under suspicion in another country. She appealed to an 'abductor' despite there being no evidence of an abduction. It seems she had decided the 'facts' of that case without any evidence to support her view whatsoever. As a person she can believe what she likes but as a judge she surely should have been more cautious?

[mercury]

The very fact  that she "f**** up" and so badly in a case where she had all the facts , but couldnt have done the same in a case where she knew b....r all is the answer, having said that, she didnt actually do much in the latter but accept guardianship...a fact that might worry the Mccanns if her judgement can go so tragically wrong whichever way you look at it

Eta in answer to the OP, not a good judge or good judge of character at last in this awful tragic case

[Admin]

Let's face it, nobody not even a judge, is infallible.

[G-Unit]

Which is why caution should be exercised. She appears to have thrown it to the winds.