Murderer Jeremy Bamber's legal bid for appeal refused - Oct 2012

[puglove]

If you analyse the blue forum now, it seems to be 4 ladies of a certain age, mertol, Gladys, and 2 intelligent men with their own agenda who still support Mike and his wanderings. So that's 8 people. I suppose I could do a quiz about this, but I'd be interested to know what the ratio is, re: the rest of Great Britain. I'm guessing quite small.   >@@(*&)

I would say that unless you were from the Colchester/Maldon area you probably wouldn't even remember the case let alone be interested in it.       

I wonder how many of the band of eight "support" JB just because, 27 years ago, he was OKish looking. Conveniently forgetting that he robbed the caravan park, knowing the anguish that would cause to Ralph, and spent months describing to JM the many ways he was considering killing his adopted family. Ooops. Forgot he now transposes books for blind people. He must be kosher, then.

[frank50]

The only reason these women support him is because he used to be good looking. Its a very common phenomenom, seen more in the US where hideous mass murderers (a bit like Bamber come to think of it) have numerous groupies backing them and fighting amongst themselves to marry them.

If you analyse the blue forum now, it seems to be 4 ladies of a certain age, mertol, Gladys, and 2 intelligent men with their own agenda who still support Mike and his wanderings. So that's 8 people. I suppose I could do a quiz about this, but I'd be interested to know what the ratio is, re: the rest of Great Britain. I'm guessing quite small.   >@@(*&)

I would say that unless you were from the Colchester/Maldon area you probably wouldn't even remember the case let alone be interested in it.       

I wonder how many of the band of eight "support" JB just because, 27 years ago, he was OKish looking. Conveniently forgetting that he robbed the caravan park, knowing the anguish that would cause to Ralph, and spent months describing to JM the many ways he was considering killing his adopted family. Ooops. Forgot he now transposes books for blind people. He must be kosher, then.

[Angelo222]

Totally agree Frank.  Bambers lawyers can make fresh applications until the cows come home but the commission will inevitably refuse them.  There has to come a stage when he Simon Mckay will realise that he is just being used as a stooge.  Jackie Preece brought him in on a hype and a lot of flannel. Let's face it, Bamber has no fresh evidence of anything as it is all propaganda.   

[Angelo222]

The only reason these women support him is because he used to be good looking. Its a very common phenomenom, seen more in the US where hideous mass murderers (a bit like Bamber come to think of it) have numerous groupies backing them and fighting amongst themselves to marry them.

Do you notice how Dani Hammond uses a 27 year old photo of Bamber in her posts on the official website?  Who is she trying to fool anyway?  Has anyone ever seen any photos of this Hammond person?

[BB]

Well i dont know the case as well as others on here but this stuff about the logs is surely nonsense. If Mike had logs which could assist Bamber he would have provided them to the CCRC. You dont hold back information like that for some future application. I dont think there is anything else material to come out. If Bamber loses the JR its the end of the road ( although Im sure hell plod on as he has nothing else to do).

Well from what I recall, Mike Tesko went with Z to the CCRC when he delivered, by hand, a copy of Sheila on the bed with one bullet wound...... according to Mr Tesko, that was the trump card that would blow the case out the water    He drip feeds his forum supporters to keep them coming. I think nothing short of JB confessing will stop the die hards, they have convinced themselves. Even if JB confessed, they'd swear he was coerced into it.

Even if I thought someone convicted of murder didn't get a fair trial, I wouldn't hold them up as some kind of demi god  8-)(--) because they could still be guilty!! and we're talking murder here, including 2 defenceless little boys.

[Tim Invictus]

Well i dont know the case as well as others on here but this stuff about the logs is surely nonsense. If Mike had logs which could assist Bamber he would have provided them to the CCRC. You dont hold back information like that for some future application. I dont think there is anything else material to come out. If Bamber loses the JR its the end of the road ( although Im sure hell plod on as he has nothing else to do).

Well from what I recall, Mike Tesko went with Z to the CCRC when he delivered, by hand, a copy of Sheila on the bed with one bullet wound...... according to Mr Tesko, that was the trump card that would blow the case out the water    He drip feeds his forum supporters to keep them coming. I think nothing short of JB confessing will stop the die hards, they have convinced themselves. Even if JB confessed, they'd swear he was coerced into it.

Even if I thought someone convicted of murder didn't get a fair trial, I wouldn't hold them up as some kind of demi god  8-)(--) because they could still be guilty!! and we're talking murder here, including 2 defenceless little boys.

It's quite bizarre how Tesko's poodles let him sprout his lies without a murmur of decent. At best they make excuses for the old con along the lines that he is trying to inspire debate by sprouting lies!

There in lies the difference between the forums. If John or Shona or myself or anyone else on this forum was inventing utter bullsh*t lies they would immediately be challenged and soon derided. And rightly so!

They do actually know their cause is hopeless and squeeze them a little harder a few would admit Bamber is actually guilty. That doesn't fit their holier-than-thou 'freedom fighter' image of themselves though so they carry on with their little charade! Of course there a few complete idiots over there too who would swallow any story they were told; wouldn't you Mertol!

 8-)(--)

[Matthew Wyse]

I came across this earlier on twitter.  Here is Simon Mckay's attempt at a response to the judicial review decision to refuse Bambers application on the papers.

http://thejusticegap.com/2012/10/judicial-mischief/

[ActualMat]

Oooh, so Jeremy isn't optimistic?

Can't say I blame him!

[puglove]

Oooh, so Jeremy isn't optimistic?

Can't say I blame him!

If he reads "his" forum, especially over the last 6 months, then I don't blame him, either. I would imagine that he despairs.

[frank50]

Thanks for that - interesting to read and pretty desperate stuff by Mckay who has sought to cast doubt on the whole process even before the renewal hearing. At least we know now that they have renewed the application.

 

I came across this earlier on twitter.  Here is Simon Mckay's attempt at a response to the judicial review decision to refuse Bambers application on the papers.

http://thejusticegap.com/2012/10/judicial-mischief/

[Tim Invictus]

I came across this earlier on twitter.  Here is Simon Mckay's attempt at a response to the judicial review decision to refuse Bambers application on the papers.

http://thejusticegap.com/2012/10/judicial-mischief/

Well found Matthew and thank's for posting. I really don't like McKay and have been decidely underwhelmed by every move and comment he has made in the Bamber case. He is definitley not the hot shot solicitor advocat we were led to believe but rather appears qzite a desperate little man. If he doesn't win he blames the game and the rules!

[frank50]

Good post. Mckay just sounds increasingly like his desperate client. Roll on the hearing and the end of the road for Mr Bamber. We can then all sign out of here, confident in the knowldege that the CCRC will not consider any further applications whatever crap Team Bamber drags up. 

I came across this earlier on twitter.  Here is Simon Mckay's attempt at a response to the judicial review decision to refuse Bambers application on the papers.

http://thejusticegap.com/2012/10/judicial-mischief/

Well found Matthew and thank's for posting. I really don't like McKay and have been decidely underwhelmed by every move and comment he has made in the Bamber case. He is definitley not the hot shot solicitor advocat we were led to believe but rather appears qzite a desperate little man. If he doesn't win he blames the game and the rules!

[John]

Did you see the sanctimonious claptrap written by Poppy Ann Miller at the bottom of the article?

Thanks to the CCRC and their cronies, Jeremy Bamber has been incarcerated for 27 years for a crime he could not possibly have committed. The CCRC would do well to refer to the definition of Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...


Seemingly it is the CCRC's fault that Jeremy Bamber has been incarcerated for over 27 years now?  I always thought it was because he murdered his father, mother, sister and twin nephews.  Silly me!   8-)(--)

[frank50]

You beat me to it. I was going to comment on that site but couldnt be arsed to stoop to their level and no-one reads that periodical anyway. `A crime he could not possibly have commmitted'. Why is that exactly? Oh yeh, cos he loved his parents so much, thats it. So much in fact that he robbed their caravan site, went away immediately after they were killed on a champage and drug-fuelled holiday and treated his dad so badlly when he was alive that the housekeeper recalls Neville telling her that he had to watch his back at all times when Jeremy was around. I just wish the JR could dismissed and this case could come to a final conclusion as one thing is certain- THERE IS NO WAY THAT THE CCRC WILL REOPEN THIS CASE.

Did you see the sanctimonious claptrap written by Poppy Ann Miller at the bottom of the article?

Thanks to the CCRC and their cronies, Jeremy Bamber has been incarcerated for 27 years for a crime he could not possibly have committed. The CCRC would do well to refer to the definition of Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...


Seemingly it is the CCRC's fault that Jeremy Bamber has been incarcerated for over 27 years now?  I always thought it was because he murdered his father, mother, sister and twin nephews.  Silly me!   8-)(--)

[puglove]

I agree, Frank. I've always said that JB behaved like a complete shit before, during and after the funerals. The display of faux grief at the church (which he made sure to record  -  why?) was pathetic. Some people are quick to say "oh, everyone grieves in different ways, he was young...etc", well, he didn't grieve at all, not even for his beloved Dad (who he didn't mind ripping off when he robbed and trashed the caravan park office). And he was a grown man, not 12. True colours.