Author Topic: David Payne and his visit to the McCann's apartment hours before Madeleine disappeared.  (Read 50305 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
Not this again.  How many times are we going to go over old ground such as this before it finally begins to lose its fascination?  This particular (non) issue seems to bring out the sniggering schoolboy in some.  What possible significance do you believe this trivial point holds to the investigation?

Indubitably. 

I'm sure The News of the World would have splashed it up something royal if there had some scandal

As it is, Kate and Gerry are rock-solid in their marriage and there is not an iota of evidence other than that (the couple) remain close (platonic!) friends with Dr David Payne (and his wife).

The moderation of this board (that professes to be so hot on clamping down on libel) so often betrays a total misunderstanding or lack of understanding of what libel is (and isn't)!

Offline John

Not this again.  How many times are we going to go over old ground such as this before it finally begins to lose its fascination?  This particular (non) issue seems to bring out the sniggering schoolboy in some.  What possible significance do you believe this trivial point holds to the investigation?

Simple Alf.  Because it undermines his status as a reliable witness.  Not only could he not recall what she was wearing but he failed to mention she wasn't wearing anything at all except a hastily applied bath towel.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2016, 05:10:58 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

ferryman

  • Guest
Because it undermines his status as a reliable witness.

Crap

And more libel.

(Whatever it is)

Offline John

Crap

And more libel.

(Whatever it is)

Its fact actually.  I can see now why Leicestershire Police officer DC 1485 MESSIAH asked that specific question.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2016, 05:08:45 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline jassi

Simple Alf.  Because it undermines his status as a reliable witness.  Not only could he not recall what she was wearing but he failed to mention she wasn't wearing anything.

Removed. Because this is offensive,




« Last Edit: August 27, 2016, 08:50:08 PM by Eleanor »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Alfie

  • Guest
Because it undermines his status as a reliable witness.
you think Madeleine's disappearance pivots on what Kate McCann was wearing when she greeted David Payne at the door of the apartment?  Is what she was wearing of such great importance that  a reliable witness would be able to recall it, but anyone unable to recall it must have their entire testimony thrown out?  What utter rubbish.

Offline John

Understandable really. The sight of Kate flaunting her bits is enough to reduce anyone to a gibbering idiot.

Unforgettable yet Payne forgot?   @)(++(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Alfie

  • Guest
Understandable really. The sight of Kate flaunting her bits is enough to reduce anyone to a gibbering idiot.
How old are you?  Which bits was Kate flaunting that would have you reduced to the status of a gibbering idiot (or should I say more of one than you clearly already are)?

Offline John

you think Madeleine's disappearance pivots on what Kate McCann was wearing when she greeted David Payne at the door of the apartment?  Is what she was wearing of such great importance that  a reliable witness would be able to recall it, but anyone unable to recall it must have their entire testimony thrown out?  What utter rubbish.

Do you honestly think a man would forget such a trivial detail?
« Last Edit: August 28, 2016, 11:31:08 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Angelo222

Its fact actually.  I can see now why Leicestershire Police officer DC 1485 MESSIAH asked that specific question.

Do you think it was a trick question?  Maybe he should have refused to answer on the basis that his answer might prove embarrassing??
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline G-Unit

Do you honestly think a man would forget such a trivial detail?

I'm now wondering if Alfie is short for Alfreda. All the men I've ever met would have noticed and would have mentioned it to the male police interviewer.

According to anther doctor's testimony Mr Payne was quite capable of indulging in a bit of 'nudge nudge wink wink', but not on this occasion it seems.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline pathfinder73

"Gerry said, were just absolutely knackered and Kate was getting them bathed and ready for bed."

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm

So why did her husband pop round to take them out? This period must be a record of contradictions and lapses in memory.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Angelo222

"Gerry said, were just absolutely knackered and Kate was getting them bathed and ready for bed."

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm

So why did her husband pop round to take them out? This period must be a record of contradictions and lapses in memory.

Was this the day after they fell out?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline pathfinder73

Was this the day after they fell out?

No at tennis on evening of 3 May when David Payne was visiting Kate.

Fiona Payne

1485
 'And then you got up there, once you had all finished eating, and you went to watch the men play tennis''
 
 
 Reply
 'Yeah'.
 
 
 1485
 'Just tell me a little bit about that, who was playing who and was there any kids around''
 
 Reply
 'Erm, yeah, I mean, Gerry, phew, I don't know who was playing who, but there was certainly Gerry, Matt, erm, you know, Russ and Dave, erm, and typically being men, it was all quite competitive and, erm, and far different to the women's tennis. Erm, Kate and the kids, I think, as I said earlier, weren't there and, you know, they, as Gerry said, were just absolutely knackered and Kate was getting them bathed and ready for bed. Erm, and, yeah, the others, sort of me, Rachael and Jane, with the kids, our kids, were just sort of watching them playing for a bit, we didn't stay that long that night'.

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline G-Unit

A year on Fiona's memory wasn't that great;

1485
 'No. So, and again, you have answered this question, but between six and seven as well, could you tell me where David was''
Reply
 'Erm, I can up to a point, yeah. He was, as I say, he left, as I see it, around six, erm, and then I wouldn't have seen him again until I got to the tennis courts to see him play tennis, so that would have been about half six and then he was playing tennis for that whole half an hour and, as I say, we left him playing tennis, when me and my mum went up to bath the kids and he, he didn't sort of return until after seven, ten past seven, quarter past seven, something like that, so, yeah, that's where he was. And then the rest is what he's told me, erm, again, I couldn't tell you times, but I know before he went, went to tennis, he popped in on Kate and the kids, erm, and saw them all in their pyjamas, ready for bed, having a story, before going to join for the tennis, so I can only assume that that was between, erm, you know, six and half past'.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm
 
We have reliable CCTV evidence showing that the men left the Paraiso at 18.13 and the women at 18.36, so Fiona definitely didn't see her husband playing tennis between 6.30 and 7pm.
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id213.html

Perhaps between 6.45 and 7pm depending on how quickly the women walked back. There were four women, three buggy's [?] and two small children [Ellie and Lily] walking [?].
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0