What happened when Gerry said "no comment" in that instance?

[G-Unit]

pI was wondering who had hay fever. It doesn't seem to have been Gerry or the twins as they hadn't seen their GP. That means Kate or Madeleine. Why that particular drug though? Surely there were other licensed drugs available?

[Robittybob1]

pI was wondering who had hay fever. It doesn't seem to have been Gerry or the twins as they hadn't seen their GP. That means Kate or Madeleine. Why that particular drug though? Surely there were other licensed drugs available?

Could you transfer the discussion to the thread on drug use please.  It seems it will be lost in this thread totally off topic.

[Alice Purjorick]

Could you transfer the discussion to the thread on drug use please.  It seems it will be lost in this thread totally off topic.

Ay ooop yer bug***s 'tis RobbityMod thar nors.

[Robittybob1]

Ay ooop yer bug***s 'tis RobbityMod thar nors.

Why are pirates pirates ? because they ARRR!

Here is another crappy pirate joke:
"I once sailed for a cap'n who always wore a red shirt into battle. I asked him why and he told me "If'n I be stabbed, me men will no see the blood and continue to fight on as bravely as I." A few weeks later, we were sieged 12 galleons sailing in the Queen's navy, each of them loaded with cannons and 50 men armed to the teeth an lookin' fe pirate blood.
And the captain turned to me and goes "before the battle begins, would ye fetch me brown pants?"

[Alfie]

It would be interesting to know who had hay fever and why they were using a remedy that was only available on a 'named patient' basis.

terfenadine is only available in the UK on a named-patient basis through specialist importers. There are no longer any licensed preparations containing terfenadine available in the UK (November 2005)
http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=-1576665050

 unlicensed medicines can be imported/used in the UK for the ‘special needs’ of an individual
doctor’s patient. This is known as ‘named patient’ supply. Unlicensed medicines can only be prescribed
by physicians if they are satisfied that there are no suitable licensed alternatives.
http://www.durbinglobal.com/assets/files/Imports/Unlicensedmeds.pdf

Before Madeleine's disappearance, I had only consulted Kate McCann once and never had assisted Gerry, nor ever had reason to deal with the twins Sean and Amelie
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICHARD_SCHOFIELD.htm

Their doctor of 14 months doesn't mentioned prescribing it for Madeleine, but then he doesn't mention if he ever saw Madeleine at all.

young doctor wasn't he?
"Testimony of: Ian Richard SCHOFIELD
Age is less than 18 years":

[G-Unit]

young doctor wasn't he?
"Testimony of: Ian Richard SCHOFIELD
Age is less than 18 years":

No comment. 

[Alfie]

Why should it matter who was prescribed a non sedative anti-histamine?  Would this non-sedative drug be the same drug some of you think caused the twins to be unresponsive?

[G-Unit]

Why should it matter who was prescribed a non sedative anti-histamine?  Would this non-sedative drug be the same drug some of you think caused the twins to be unresponsive?

They had a drug which had had it's licence withdrawn due to dangerous side effects. Nevertheless whoever prescribed it thought that drug and no other was necessary because they went to the trouble of prescribing it on a named patient basis, which requires a lot of record keeping and justification. I wondered why it was so important, that's all.

[Alfie]

They had a drug which had had it's licence withdrawn due to dangerous side effects. Nevertheless whoever prescribed it thought that drug and no other was necessary because they went to the trouble of prescribing it on a named patient basis, which requires a lot of record keeping and justification. I wondered why it was so important, that's all.

what difference does it make to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann?  The only person claiming it's important is you, why?

[Mr Gray]

They had a drug which had had it's licence withdrawn due to dangerous side effects. Nevertheless whoever prescribed it thought that drug and no other was necessary because they went to the trouble of prescribing it on a named patient basis, which requires a lot of record keeping and justification. I wondered why it was so important, that's all.

There is no proof they had that drug
Tho only evidence is the unreliable statements

[G-Unit]

There is no proof they had that drug
Tho only evidence is the unreliable statements

Signed by the witness.

[Alfie]

Signed by the witness.

Did the doctor aged under 18 sign his statement?

[slartibartfast]

Did the doctor aged under 18 sign his statement?

Since he was born in 1958 a bit odd.

[Mr Gray]

Signed by the witness.

the statement was in portuguese and therefore not read by gerry

[Alfie]

Since he was born in 1958 a bit odd.

Yes a bit odd, but as it was in his statement and as he signed it, it must be true, right?!