Who has Doubts as to Dr Vincent Tabak's Guilt ?

[[...]]

Have you had a read of the CPS (got it right this time!) Retrials of Serious Offences? That tells a lot of what is needed for this to happen. I gotta admit I haven't read it all.

I will read this Nina... And get back to you on it.... But I must admit I have things I need to be getting on with... So I'll get back to you on that one.... Very soon... Oh yes... The post may be long!!!!


Edit... Will I need an NVQ to understand this ?????

[nina]

Oh no!! I'm losing the will to live with your long posts!!

I too have things to do, the sun shines and work awaits talk to you maybe sometime later.

[nina]

What the hell is a NVQ?

[mrswah]

What the hell is a NVQ?

A National Vocational Qualification, as far as I know!!!

[nina]

Thanks mrswah, I have just answered a post to you on the other thread.

[[...]]

Oh no!! I'm losing the will to live with your long posts!!

I too have things to do, the sun shines and work awaits talk to you maybe sometime later.

I was thinking about you "Pointing" me in directions Nina.... And you reminded me of JIXY and PaulTheRed...

Wanting me to answer their question on the spot.... I answer them normally when I get to them because I am normally Cross Referencing something else whilst I post....

So I know you hate my long posts... Can I suggest that you take a bit of time out when your not busy... And please read up on that type of information yourself...

Maybe then... You could give a more concise conclusion than I obviously can... 

[nina]

Oh come on Nine, what have I said to upset you? Do I need to start every post with a `pc' notice? I thought that you would have learnt a little more about me over the last few days, and upsetting or getting you or anyone else angry is just not me.

I have read from the beginning and as I have said it's only because this happened on my doorstep that I have got involved with this topic. As you rightly pointed out after my first post I joined in 2014 and hadn't written a word, until now.

Your posts, can you not just give the `bottom' line and the links?

[nina]

I don't think that I have been "Pointing you in Directions" Nine. If so where?

[nina]

I am not JIXY or Paul the Red, just as in the beginning they were accusing you and mrswah of being the same people, I must point out that I have never had contact with these posters and I don't know them, in the real world as well as online.

[mrswah]

Firstly mrswah.... The "Sex Register" didn't come until after the trial... and as we known it wasn't straight after .... It was years after!!!

I believe he is Innocent mrswah as you know

Yes I believe he has been stitched up... And they thought that they did a very good job.... But I am here to prove that they didn't... And so far... we have more questions than most of us may have had to start with.... Look at 'The One Hundred Questions" thread.... There are over 1000 questions on it so far... and who knows where it may lead too....

I agree with you basically, and in my opinion, the "sex offender" trial had to happen just in case the stitches started to unravel-----but, I repeat, that is just my opinion.

It is difficult for me to believe that VT is either a killer or a sex offender, BUT I could be wrong. I don't actually know him, of course, and even if I did, I still wouldn't be able to be sure of what he was/wasn't capable of.

IF he was stitched up, they DID do a very good job in that the vast majority of people believe in his guilt-----or else they haven't thought about it much one way or the other, or have forgotten about it long ago. Somebody would have to come forward with some very credible new evidence for anyone to take much notice of what we say on
 here-----IMO, of course!!

And, it COULD happen.

[mrswah]

I am not JIXY or Paul the Red, just as in the beginning they were accusing you and mrswah of being the same people, I must point out that I have never had contact with these posters and I don't know them, in the real world as well as online.

It doesn't matter who any of us are----that is the whole point of a forum: what matters is what we think!

[[...]]

Oh come on Nine, what have I said to upset you? Do I need to start every post with a `pc' notice? I thought that you would have learnt a little more about me over the last few days, and upsetting or getting you or anyone else angry is just not me.

I have read from the beginning and as I have said it's only because this happened on my doorstep that I have got involved with this topic. As you rightly pointed out after my first post I joined in 2014 and hadn't written a word, until now.

Your posts, can you not just give the `bottom' line and the links?

Nina... I was not getting upset... I was hoping not to offend your sensibilities...  And not knowing your age... tire you out with all the reading of my Extremely Long Posts....

But you have to admit... I cannot be the only contributor on here .... And others should have an opportunity to add to what they may or may nor believe about this case ....

It has been a tough struggle for me doing this... I am putting my neck out... I am saying what few would dare to say, even if they thought it.... So I like to take time to read and sometimes come back to idea's that have been suggested to me...

Because quite often and for a very long time ... In fact Years... people have just skimmed over The Information available... Not really Comprehending what has taken place regarding this Case...

They expect to hear certain words... like Pink T-Shirt... without bothering to read anymore... Just as I did... Until we discovered that The Pink T-Shirt was actually A Flower Patterned Pink Top that Dr delaney describes Joanna Yeates in when he examines her...

But we ignore that part... We have 'The Ram" CCTV footage to show us Joanna Yeates in what could be a Pink Plain T-Shirt... But that footage only goes into "Proving" That Joanna Yeates must have changed her clothing after arriving home on Friday 17th December 2010... Also casting Doubt... On Dr Vincent Tabak's conviction... (IMO)....

So No Nina I am not upset with you... why would I be upset with you.. knowing you have been a member since 2014 and therefore must have read an incredible amount of posts... That are not as long as mine are... And mine must play havoc... when people just like a quick question and answer session... 

[nina]

Okay Nine so I guess I took it wrong sorry.

 I was for your information a teen in the '60's so I guess that makes me pretty old now (you do the maths) ...... but I ain't anywhere near loosing my marbles, nor do I get tired reading long posts. It's just ....... sigh can't explain, maybe John can help here.

Aargh these words like "tire you out with long posts" are as bad as the politicians telling us that we are all living to long to me!! Rant over.

Perhaps you should watch Catching a Killer where Thames Valley police let the cameras in. It's about Natalie Hemming, it's very interesting the way the police work, heavily edited I know but still I learnt a few things.

[[...]]

Okay Nine so I guess I took it wrong sorry.

 I was for your information a teen in the '60's so I guess that makes me pretty old now (you do the maths) ...... but I ain't anywhere near loosing my marbles, nor do I get tired reading long posts. It's just ....... sigh can't explain, maybe John can help here.

Aargh these words like "tire you out with long posts" are as bad as the politicians telling us that we are all living to long to me!! Rant over.

Perhaps you should watch Catching a Killer where Thames Valley police let the cameras in. It's about Natalie Hemming, it's very interesting the way the police work, heavily edited I know but still I learnt a few things.

Ok Nina... I'm sure John will help out here .. And I will get a warning.... But I'm sorry if I offended.. My writing style is such that it leans towards Long Posts.... And if it's short posts that people require... I can no longer promise that or maybe contribute... Because I will not make a statement unless I have a way of proving where I gained the information from... Or who said....said Information...as in Transcripts from video's etc...

And I will look at the Catching a Killer program... But may not be able to comment as the length of my post may offend....

So... maybe John has had enough of giving warnings and will go with a straight "Ban" again....
 
Oh Well.... You cannot Unring 'The Bell".... Or shut the gate after the horse has bolted.... What I have said I have said... And let them who were involved in The Case against Dr Vincent Tabak... prove me wrong... I would love to get an opportunity to see Ann Reddrop in a witness box explaining why 'The Head of The Complex Crime Unit  was involved with 'A Simple Murder Case".... From start to finish.... And why we were never given the opportunity to know what type of "Manslaughter" Dr Vincent Tabak plead Guilty to in May 2011...

[nina]

NO I did NOT mean for John to give you a warning or 'owt like that. He just has a way with words that I don't and could probably tell you without a warning, just what long posts do to the mortal soul!!

Don't mean to drop you in it Nine.