Author Topic: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)  (Read 725795 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2115 on: May 18, 2016, 11:16:43 AM »
Has Mr Mitchell got a new job with JBP?

Clarence Mitchell
Director of Client & Media Services

http://www.jbp.co.uk/about/clarence-mitchell

McCann family spokesman Clarence Mitchell joins public affairs agency JBP
Read more at http://www.prweek.com/article/1395236/mccann-family-spokesman-clarence-mitchell-joins-public-affairs-agency-jbp#YIgDKyliBGXHX0UR.99

When he launched Clarence Mitchell Communications JBP were mentioned as clients;

Among his founding clients are JBP, a Westminster strategic PR and public affairs agency, where he will act as a senior consultant.
http://www.prweek.com/article/1360396/madeleine-mccann-family-spokesman-clarence-mitchell-sets-pr-agency

So is he running his own company, working for the McCanns and for JBP? He seems to have gone quiet on the McCann front lately. Perhaps he's spreading himself a bit thinly.

Maybe he is being astute making a smooth move. Still close enough to take credit but far enough away to say "nothing to do with me pal" ?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline G-Unit

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2116 on: May 18, 2016, 12:06:53 PM »
Maybe he is being astute making a smooth move. Still close enough to take credit but far enough away to say "nothing to do with me pal" ?

I guess he did what he was paid to do. Judging by the 'anniversary' silence it's possible that the idea of keeping Madeleine's 'abduction' in the headlines is being toned down or abandoned. The media seem willing to carry on printing the stories but the comments suggest that people don't want to read them any more.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2117 on: May 18, 2016, 12:09:36 PM »
Police ALWAYS suspect the uncooperative

See the telegraph has repeated the story and stuck trolls in inverted commas lol

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/14/uk-internet-trolls-raise-over-50000-in-donations-to-help-portugu/

Honest police don't suspect (or especially accuse) without ground or foundation.

Offline G-Unit

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2118 on: May 18, 2016, 01:37:26 PM »
Honest police don't suspect (or especially accuse) without ground or foundation.

Who are these honest police then? South Yorkshire police were assumed to be honest about Hillsborough (although I heard the truth from an eye-witness on the day) and their behaviour at Orgreave is being questioned (I heard from people involved in the Miner's Strike about 'dirty tricks' at the time). It seems UK policemen are only honest until found out.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2119 on: May 18, 2016, 04:00:06 PM »
This topic is sailing too close to the wind.  Kindly turn down the knob marked 'potential for libel'.

Thanks.
What's up, old man?

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2120 on: May 20, 2016, 10:07:24 AM »
The donkey jacket that never was and the birth of spin:

Brian McArthur reviews Keith McDowall's Before Spin

  • Before Spin is an illuminating memoir of McDowall's distinguished career
  • The title of the book is a deliberate tilt at modern spin doctors
  • The book should be read by journalists, civil servants and politicians

By BRIAN MCARTHUR FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 23:25, 19 May 2016 | UPDATED: 23:39, 19 May 2016

**snip
The title of the book, Before Spin, is a deliberate tilt at modern spin doctors, although he doesn't exempt papers from his criticisms.

Have today's journalists no pride left, he asks?

'Would they rather take Richard Desmond's shilling on the Daily Express than tell him where to put his job if it meant inflicting further torture on the McCanns, falsely accused of murdering their own child?'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-3599854/Brian-McArthur-reviews-Keith-McDowall-s-Spin.html#ixzz49BXcaNh4
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2121 on: May 20, 2016, 01:31:47 PM »
Another one assuming that he knows the truth about what happened in the Madeleine McCann case.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline mercury

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2122 on: May 21, 2016, 10:44:13 PM »
Another one assuming that he knows the truth about what happened in the Madeleine McCann case.

Anther one forgetting the mccanns actually employed a spin doctor. Didnt see that article.  The chap has been reading the tabloids to talk about the tabloids. Does he believe the tabloids or not? As he states the mccanns were accused of murder, only available in the tabloids, nowhere else. SO who was spnnng the truth here? The tabloids or the spn doctors? does he know the difference?
« Last Edit: May 21, 2016, 10:48:33 PM by mercury »

Offline mercury

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2123 on: May 21, 2016, 11:43:50 PM »
Just looking for supreme
e court application news , nothing yet, but oops, wtf , sharon osborne?
Her mate simon cowell wont like this

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sharon-osbourne-blasted-missing-madeleine-8023352

I wonder what the family pal thnks SO is ill informed and ignorant about
« Last Edit: May 22, 2016, 12:09:41 AM by mercury »



Alfie

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2126 on: May 28, 2016, 08:36:07 AM »
Shes always been reasonable
I don't think theorizing that Gerry smuggled Madeleine's body back to England in a holdall was particularly reasonable myself.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2127 on: May 28, 2016, 09:26:19 AM »
I don't think theorizing that Gerry smuggled Madeleine's body back to England in a holdall was particularly reasonable myself.

When did Pat Brown suggest that theory ?

Offline lordpookles

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2128 on: May 28, 2016, 11:56:19 AM »
She has postulated that this is a credible theory before. IMO she is often hilariously blinkered and biased. She also makes good points in amongst the rubbish too. See below:

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic15571.html

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2129 on: May 28, 2016, 12:14:46 PM »
She has postulated that this is a credible theory before. IMO she is often hilariously blinkered and biased. She also makes good points in amongst the rubbish too. See below:

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic15571.html

Totally mind numbing ...

Quote from Pat Brown

Because of the climate in Portugal, it is possible that should they have buried Maddy in a shallow grave in a sandy substrate, her body would have mummified. Mummification is a desiccation of the corpse where the fluids drain into the ground and the rest of the body dries up. There is relatively little odor associated with a mummified body.

If this occurred, the body would be easier to transport; it would be lighter and drier and lacking the horrible smell of a corpse. Such a body could easily be placed in a sealed bag and placed in a suitcase. Screening of stowed luggage is not likely to uncover a body inside of a suitcase and when the traveler reaches the other end and goes through customs, they enter the “Have nothing to declare line,” and just walk through (unless they exhibit concerning behavior that raises a red flag and launches a search of the luggage). As to the McCanns, I seriously doubt they were searched upon arrival, not with all the press surrounding them and the mass of curious onlookers, reporters, and VIPS lurking about.
‘
IF the McCanns were involved and IF Maddy’s body was brought home, when this would have happened is another question. Unfortunately, only those inside the organization would (we hope) know the truth about the McCann’s movements. For example, Gerry McCann returned to England on June 19, just four days after an exhaustive search for Madeleine was called off. This search was in an arid, desolate area (the kind of climate which might encourage the mummification of a body) near a town called Odiaxere. A letter from an unknown sender had stated she could be found there in a shallow grave. Four days later, Gerry is on a plane home. I don’t know if he took any luggage with him, anything more than a rucksack (which I don’t know the size of).   End quote

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic15571.html

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....