Author Topic: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)  (Read 565592 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #135 on: December 11, 2014, 10:39:06 AM »

Sick Facebook page mocking Madeleine McCann pulled amid mass condemnation

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/sick-facebook-page-mocking-madeleine-4786595?


Isn't it sad that there are members of this forum who find it acceptable to condone what most sensible people condemn.

Do they have any insight at all about what this makes them look like? (that was a rhetorical question)

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2784.msg205449#msg205449
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #136 on: December 11, 2014, 10:42:52 AM »
Sick Facebook page mocking Madeleine McCann pulled amid mass condemnation

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/sick-facebook-page-mocking-madeleine-4786595?


Isn't it sad that there are members of this forum who find it acceptable to condone what most sensible people condemn.


Do they have any insight at all about what this makes them look like? (that was a rhetorical question)

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2784.msg205449#msg205449


Who's condoning ?  Please tell.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #137 on: December 11, 2014, 11:13:53 AM »

Who's condoning ?  Please tell.

What a little WUM you are Jassie ... if the cap fits even if only by coincidence, try wearing it.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #138 on: December 11, 2014, 12:22:16 PM »

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2784.msg205504#msg205504

I think he must have been given assurances that he was to be questioned only as a witness.  I cannot criticise him for attending the interviews with his lawyer in attendance ... because under the circumstances I would have done exactly that ... but from the PR point of view, not necessarily a good move.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #139 on: December 11, 2014, 03:09:54 PM »
What a little WUM you are Jassie ... if the cap fits even if only by coincidence, try wearing it.

So you are just making unsubstantiated statements.
As far as I'm aware, no one on here has condoned that.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline slartibartfast

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #140 on: December 11, 2014, 04:01:37 PM »
So you are just making unsubstantiated statements.
As far as I'm aware, no one on here has condoned that.

I asked a question because I wasn't sure what the "caption" was meant to mean?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #141 on: December 11, 2014, 04:29:15 PM »
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2784.msg205504#msg205504

I think he must have been given assurances that he was to be questioned only as a witness.  I cannot criticise him for attending the interviews with his lawyer in attendance ... because under the circumstances I would have done exactly that ... but from the PR point of view, not necessarily a good move.

However, there was nothing wrong when km had a lawyer in attendance ?

Double standards or what.

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #142 on: December 11, 2014, 05:08:43 PM »
However, there was nothing wrong when km had a lawyer in attendance ?

Double standards or what.

Did you bother to read my post???

What does "I cannot criticise him" mean to you exactly??

What exactly do you read into "I would have done exactly that"??

Please stop making such an utter idiot of yourself and read and try to comprehend what you read ... just in case you fail to get my meaning, let me make it plain

Dr KATE McCANN WAS PERFECTLY WITHIN HER RIGHTS TO BE ACCOMPANIED BY HER LAWYER AS WAS Mr MURAT.

If that is double standards to you ... I despair ...
« Last Edit: December 11, 2014, 05:27:58 PM by Eleanor »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #143 on: December 11, 2014, 05:24:31 PM »
Did you bother to read my post???

What does "I cannot criticise him" mean to you exactly??

What exactly do you read into "I would have done exactly that"??

Please stop making such an utter idiot of yourself and read and try to comprehend what you read ... just in case you fail to get my meaning, let me make it plain

Dr KATE McCANN WAS PERFECTLY WITHIN HER RIGHTS TO BE ACCOMPANIED BY HER LAWYER AS WAS Mr MURAT.

If that is double standards to you ... I despair ...

The lack of any moral standard is epitomized by those such as you.

Your only concern if for the mccanns.

« Last Edit: December 11, 2014, 05:28:38 PM by Eleanor »

Offline jassi

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #144 on: December 11, 2014, 05:28:41 PM »
The lack of any moral standard is epitomized by those such as you.

Your only concern if for the mccanns.




I'm sure Dr Davel will be happy to give an opinion  ?{)(**
« Last Edit: December 11, 2014, 05:40:30 PM by Eleanor »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #145 on: December 11, 2014, 05:30:07 PM »

I'm sure Dr Davel will be happy to give an opinion  ?{)(**

When doesn't he. 8)-)))

Offline VIXTE

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #146 on: December 11, 2014, 09:33:04 PM »
Strange.. Years ago I had a dream that a blond police woman found Madeleine. When I saw photo of DCI Wall it made me remember this.

Offline pegasus

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #147 on: December 12, 2014, 05:59:40 PM »
... Eye witnesses are notoriously unreliable, we are told, so unless they knew him well, could easily be mistaken for someone else with a passing resemblance, particularly as it was night-time.
And that is exactly what retrospectively happened.
Of all the witnesses who claim to have seen RM there that night, not a single one of them knew what he looked like.
Every one of those witnesses made the identification many days later, in retrospect, based in most cases on TV footage, its exactly like the the McCluskey and MSmith retrospective identifications done retrospectively from TV footage - rubbish.  None of them knew what he looked like at the time. These witnesses did see and in some cases speak with a bilingual man with glasses that night who was helping with translating, but it was certainly not RM. Read DP rog, he says he thinks the translatorman he spoke with that night may have been RM, but is not sure, it could have been someone else. (That is why he did not fly out to testify with FP RO ROB).
« Last Edit: December 12, 2014, 06:04:41 PM by pegasus »

Offline pegasus

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #148 on: December 12, 2014, 06:16:25 PM »
Strange.. Years ago I had a dream that a blond police woman found Madeleine. When I saw photo of DCI Wall it made me remember this.
She is renowned for solving cases quickly.
IMO best to ignore all open unconcealed carrying sightings including the Smith sighting.
It is so unlikely to be the method - it's as iff every investigator has been hypnotised.
"When I click my fingers you will wake up and base your whole investigation on a single sighting which probably was not the missing person at all"
"You will forget all your experience from other cases that tell you how ridiculous that is"
"Click"
Hopefully a female brain will not be so easily hypnotised
 
« Last Edit: December 12, 2014, 06:21:17 PM by pegasus »

Offline jassi

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #149 on: December 12, 2014, 06:33:43 PM »
She is renowned for solving cases quickly.
IMO best to ignore all open unconcealed carrying sightings including the Smith sighting.
It is so unlikely to be the method - it's as iff every investigator has been hypnotised.
"When I click my fingers you will wake up and base your whole investigation on a single sighting which probably was not the missing person at all"
"You will forget all your experience from other cases that tell you how ridiculous that is"
"Click"
Hopefully a female brain will not be so easily hypnotised

Might depend upon what she sees enhancing her reputation.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future