Author Topic: Where were Jez and Gerry standing when they did their talking? Ideas solutions  (Read 107531 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

The waiter who served them at the table had them all gone except Dianne at 21:50. The PJ made a mistake didn't they? Smithman was after the alarm was raised and if they investigated it properly they would have known this to be the truth.
Cite please.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta

The waiter who served them at the table had them all gone except Dianne at 21:50. The PJ made a mistake didn't they? Smithman was after the alarm was raised and if they investigated it properly they would have known this to be the truth.

It would be helpful if you would provide a cite ... it would save me asking.

Same goes for all future posts.  Thank you
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Matt said Kate left to check at 21:50 which was at least 10 minutes before the Smith sighting so none are ruled out. The waiter had them all gone except Dianne at 21:50.
How long was Dianne left on her own?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

I agree with your first sentence but not the latter.

The PJ accepted that once Gerry had returned to the table after his meeting with Jes, there is no record of him leaving it thereafter and he was still there when Kate came running back to raise the alarm that Madeleine was gone.

We have no independent witnesses who verify that. The PJ had to accept Gerry's alibi, how could they argue against 9 people with no other witnesses ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

We have no independent witnesses who verify that. The PJ had to accept Gerry's alibi, how could they argue against 9 people with no other witnesses ?
Only by deducing that they were all involved in a cover up to protect two of the group, however IMO the PJ looked at the facts and realised that this was not very likely.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Alice Purjorick

Only by deducing that they were all involved in a cover up to protect two of the group, however IMO the PJ looked at the facts and realised that this was not very likely.

How about one of these dreadfully esoteric diseases/conditions that spring up on this case from time to time whereby you cannot see someone next to you?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Vertigo Swirl

How about one of these dreadfully esoteric diseases/conditions that spring up on this case from time to time whereby you cannot see someone next to you?
Except none of the Tapas Group claimed they couldn't see Gerry at the time the alarm was raised. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Except none of the Tapas Group claimed they couldn't see Gerry at the time the alarm was raised.
Except Jane of course.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Except Jane of course.
true, but then she didn't claim to be sat at the table at the time either.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

true, but then she didn't claim to be sat at the table at the time either.
It is odd how many say they were all there, when in fact according to Jane she wasn't there.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Except none of the Tapas Group claimed they couldn't see Gerry at the time the alarm was raised.

Which means it all comes down to the time of the alert.

Dinner would end at about 21.45, a few minutes later the witness looked at the table and saw that there was nobody there
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICARDO-A-D-L-OLIVEIRA.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Which means it all comes down to the time of the alert.

Dinner would end at about 21.45, a few minutes later the witness looked at the table and saw that there was nobody there
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICARDO-A-D-L-OLIVEIRA.htm
In his second statement he clarifies that Dianne Webster was still sat at the table at that point, and we know from her statement that she sat there for a few minutes, then went to the apartment where she saw Gerry - if you say dinner ended at 21.45, and a few minutes later the table was vacated (apart from DW) and she sat there for a few minutes and went to the apartment where she saw GMC what time does that take us to?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Cite please.

G-Unit gave you this one.

Dinner would end at about 21.45, a few minutes later the witness looked at the table and saw that there was nobody there
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICARDO-A-D-L-OLIVEIRA.htm

By the way, he clarifies that that news had been communicated to all the friends who were in the Tapas by Kate McCann subsequent to her having personally been to her flat to check that her children were well.

The question asked, he relates that she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-10MAY.htm

— Around 22H00, they left Kelly's Bar. The group headed, on foot, for their apartment.
— Questioned, she responds that she knows the time that they left because her father and her brother decided to leave early that night. (Aoife Smith)
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 05:36:39 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

G-Unit gave you this one.

Dinner would end at about 21.45, a few minutes later the witness looked at the table and saw that there was nobody there
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICARDO-A-D-L-OLIVEIRA.htm

By the way, he clarifies that that news had been communicated to all the friends who were in the Tapas by Kate McCann subsequent to her having personally been to her flat to check that her children were well.

The question asked, he relates that she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-10MAY.htm

— Around 22H00, they left Kelly's Bar. The group headed, on foot, for their apartment.
— Questioned, she responds that she knows the time that they left because her father and her brother decided to leave early that night. (Aoife Smith)
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm
From Martin Smith's first statement
In 'Kelly's Bar' they consumed some drinks. They left that establishment around 21H55 as his son would be travelling very early the next day
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".