Where were Jez and Gerry standing when they did their talking? Ideas solutions

[misty]

Would have been very expensive if she was texting friends in Ireland!

It certainly would.
If her mobile was quite new, it probably had a GPS chip in it, which would have enabled the authorities to track her movements that night, i.e, precise times when the signal was stationary in the restaurant & bar, then when she moved again to return to the hotel.

[Robittybob1]

The statement is unequivocal:

"Therefore, she can only say with precision that, at 22.00 Kate McCann returned to the restaurant, seemingly in panic, communicating to others the fact that of Madeleine's disappearance"

"unequivocal
leaving no doubt; unambiguous.
"an unequivocal answer"
synonyms:   unambiguous, unmistakable, indisputable, incontrovertible, indubitable, undeniable;"

Well it isn't unequivocal as I said as Dianne does not define how she knew it was exactly 22.00.  Unless she tells us how she knew it was 22.00 it remains disputable as to precisely what time it was.

Unless you know how she knew it was 22.00 it remains disputable and equivocal. 

[pathfinder73]

Of course you are - it's always important to pick and choose which bits of which statements fit your theory.

The fact is her times were correct regardless of any theory. She said it was 10pm when they left Kelly's Bar so do the maths.

[Vertigo Swirl]

"unequivocal
leaving no doubt; unambiguous.
"an unequivocal answer"
synonyms:   unambiguous, unmistakable, indisputable, incontrovertible, indubitable, undeniable;"

Well it isn't unequivocal as I said as Dianne does not define how she knew it was exactly 22.00.  Unless she tells us how she knew it was 22.00 it remains disputable as to precisely what time it was.

Unless you know how she knew it was 22.00 it remains disputable and equivocal.

The statement is unequivocal in its meaning.  Whether she is accurate in her recall or not is another matter.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The fact is her times were correct regardless of any theory. She said it was 10pm when they left Kelly's Bar so do the maths.

Can you please provide proof that her time is 100% accurate.

[ShiningInLuz]

What you have written above is exactly my contention.  They made no attempt to cover their so-called neglect, yet Faithlilly believes they were trying to save their own skins over the neglect issue and that is why theiir statments cannot be trusted.

That may be your contention.  It does not happen to be mine.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That may be your contention.  It does not happen to be mine.

What exactly do you think I am saying?

[ShiningInLuz]

What exactly do you think I am saying?

According to your post, that what I wrote is exactly your contention.

[Robittybob1]

The statement is unequivocal in its meaning.  Whether she is accurate in her recall or not is another matter.

Any time could be plus or minus the degree of uncertainty.  OK so what is the unequivocal meaning of what Dianne says?

[pathfinder73]

Can you please provide proof that her time is 100% accurate.

Smithman is the proof - his false alibi is the evidence but until his identity is revealed I can say no more 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Smithman is the proof - his false alibi is the evidence but until his identity is revealed I can say no more 

So as I suspected you have nothing upon which to base your cast iron assertion.  I believe an IMO is called for in your earlier post.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Any time could be plus or minus the degree of uncertainty.  OK so what is the unequivocal meaning of what Dianne says?

I’ve already explained- the statement itself is unequivocal, she seems to be certain that the alarm was raised at 10pm.  Of course she may be wrong, but if posters insist on using her statement as proof of one thing, but then choose to disbelieve her statement on another point, then IMO that is simply picking and choosing bits to fit a theory.

[pathfinder73]

So as I suspected you have nothing upon which to base your cast iron assertion.  I believe an IMO is called for in your earlier post.

I will always be many moves ahead of you. I bet you can't wait for the truth then disappear from here or maybe you will be abducted

[faithlilly]

And yet none of them attempted to cover up the fact that they had all left their children unattended.  That doesn't make any sense.

Strength in numbers

[Vertigo Swirl]

According to your post, that what I wrote is exactly your contention.

So your contention is my contention but that doesn’t happen to be your contention.  You can see why I’m baffled.