Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk

[Mr Gray]

What is, the problem.... I support the mccanns because based on the evidence I've seen I think they are good people who have suffered the loss of their daughter... I don't believe  they are trying to cover anything up...I think they are genuine in their efforts to find out what has happened... So I'm a supporter and a believer... No problem

[Brietta]

In my opinion they join other forums to have their say, just like anyone else.

It appears to me that there are areas which people agree on, although their reasons may differ. The McCann's supporters and the MMRG share doubts about the Smith's evidence and motives, for example.

I admire Carana's dedication in responding to these 60 questions, and I mostly agree with Carana's conclusions.

You mean they are members of a forum which does not allow them "to have their say" so feel the need to join fora such as ours which will enable them to express an opinion "just like anyone else."

How extraordinary is that?

[Carana]

I disagree, there are a wide range of people with different opinions. To put them in two groups is far too simplistic. For example TB and his follows are not sceptics IMO, they are not inclined to question or doubt the McCanns, they are believers in an alternate truth.

You mean like those who believe the Queen is actually a lizard from Middle Earth?

[slartibartfast]

You mean like those who believe the Queen is actually a lizard from Middle Earth?

No, more that as we don’t know what the truth is people believe different versions of it.

[Mr Gray]

No, more that as we don’t know what the truth is people believe different versions of it.

IMO Either the mccanns know exactly what happened  to Maddie and where she is... or they don't.... There is no in between
Edit IMO added.

[faithlilly]

IMO Either the mccanns know exactly what happened  to Maddie and where she is... or they don't.... There is no in between
Edit IMO added.

There is Angelo’s theory, though not one I subscribe to myself.

[G-Unit]

You mean they are members of a forum which does not allow them "to have their say" so feel the need to join fora such as ours which will enable them to express an opinion "just like anyone else."

How extraordinary is that?

No, that's not what I meant. People join different forums to discuss the case with different people imo.

[slartibartfast]

IMO Either the mccanns know exactly what happened  to Maddie and where she is... or they don't.... There is no in between
Edit IMO added.

What the McCanns know or don’t know is immaterial. The members of this forum don’t know.

[Mr Gray]

When a, new, thread, is, posted it's, totally predictable how individual posters, will respond... The, dogs.... The 48 questions... The jemmied shutters.. They respond on a supporter/sceptic viewpoint

[Mr Gray]

What the McCanns know or don’t know is immaterial. The members of this forum don’t know.

What the mccanns do or do not know is not immaterial... It's very important ....

[Mr Gray]

IMO Either the mccanns know exactly what happened  to Maddie and where she is... or they don't.... There is no in between
Edit IMO added.

Strange edit... Either the mccanns know what happened and where she is.. Or they don't.... Surely that is a fact not an opinion

[slartibartfast]

What the mccanns do or do not know is not immaterial... It's very important ....

As far as debate on internet fora it is immaterial. We don’t know what they know.

[Mr Gray]

As far as debate on internet fora it is immaterial. We don’t know what they know.

There is constant debate here suggesting it hey do know

[slartibartfast]

There is constant debate here suggesting it hey do know

So who on here knows what the McCanns know?

[Brietta]

So who on here knows what the McCanns know?

Since that is off topic it is probably immaterial to the thread.  Maybe a more pertinent question would be why this group of people ... what are they? ... researchers or investigators? took it upon themselves to send a twenty page letter to the Portuguese Attorney General possibly on the presumption they know more than Scotland Yard and the Judicial Police combined.

First of all ... why only twenty pages?
Isn't the going rate 60?

Secondly the purpose of the missive?  Do they really expect acknowledgement?