I will give you credit for those posts Sadie because you have highlighted some important points but regardless none of it is evidence of a stranger abduction' from the bedroom. The open window and shutter and the absence of the child's fingerprints on any door is not evidence of an abduction. How the parents reacted after the 3rd May 2007 also proves nothing really, ever heard of the double bluff? Isolated instances of other children disappearing have no identified connection to the Maddie case. We know Joana Cipriano was killed by her uncle in a conspiracy which included her own mother so again no relevance to the Maddie case. And even SY have discarded Tanner's sighting as nothing more than an innocent tourist carrying his daughter back to his apartment. As for the McCanns perceived keeness to pursue an enquiry involving SY, I would question that as to not do so would have raised more questions than provided answers.
What you have actually achieved in your 13 posts is that in reality the abduction theory hangs by a very thin thread.
How the parents reacted after the 3rd May 2007 also proves nothing really, ever heard of the double bluff?Come on Angelo. For both to be so destroyed by it. Poor Kate, she looked so desperately unhappy and ill; at times she looked older than her very pretty Mum.
To maintain a double bluff and in front of their friends too, they would
both need to be pschopaths and brilliant liars and actors too. You are not being realistic imo
How often have you heard of a couple who were guilty actually fighting for the best Police Force in the UK to investigate ? SY are world famous and solve most of their cases.
OMO, but I think they have solved this one, but it is complex and involving important people globally. It will need massive evidence and the very best lawyers to prove anything
We know Joana Cipriano was killed by her uncle in a conspiracy which included her own mother so again no relevance to the Maddie case.You and John maintain that but there was NO REAL EVIDENCE as you well know. Just the statement of a tortured woman, which was immediately rescinded when she was out of their grasp .... and the statement of a druggie, who if not tortured, would have been very easy to persuad using drugs as a carrot .... and a rediculous film that would not persuade the simplest of people unless already biased.
I believe that Joana Cipriano is still alive, or at least she was in 2008 ish. Two other things, which I am not prepared to share, also convince me that she is likely to be still alive.
People are questioning whether the Courts finding was Just. This forum should be about Justice and not about supporting Amaral willy nilly. We KNOW that he doesn't always tell the truth from his Court trial .... and his "O Enigma" was a laugh a minute with all its incorrect statements.
