Should SY set up a special unit to investigate ALL missing child cases?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Of course not. I just don't discuss this or other similar matters with people as they are generally uninterested.

Then people like us on this forum obviously fulfil a need you have to discuss certain matters on a regular basis.  most of us are genuine and believe in what we write, our views are real, and part of our real lives, therefore they matter to us.

[faithlilly]

I don't follow your logic, sorry, furthermore your post is quite off topic.

Oh I think you do.

[Mr Gray]

Oh I think you do.

I follow your logic but it's flawed imo

[faithlilly]

I follow your logic but it's flawed imo

In what way ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oh I think you do.

Why don't you start a new thread and explain it to me, because I can assure you I don't.

[faithlilly]

Why don't you start a new thread and explain it to me, because I can assure you I don't.

Davel seems to follow my point. Perhaps he’ll explain it to you if you ask him nicely.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Davel seems to follow my point. Perhaps he’ll explain it to you if you ask him nicely.

Discuss it with him then, this thread is about whether or not the Met should investigate ALL missing children cases.  What do you think? 

[Mr Gray]

Davel seems to follow my point. Perhaps he’ll explain it to you if you ask him nicely.

I can see where your logic is wrong and VS cannot see where it's right... How's that

Now back on topic

[faithlilly]

I can see where your logic is wrong and VS cannot see where it's right... How's that

You can’t say that the investigation was flawed yet believe that it’s conclusion was correct. It simply won’t do.

[Robittybob1]

You can’t say that the investigation was flawed yet believe that it’s conclusion was correct. It simply won’t do.

I think you can.  If you look at the aspect that received  the greatest amount of effort.  Like it you could say it was a flawed investigation but the amount of work on the parents showed they were not involved.

[faithlilly]

Not one solitary fact showed that the McCanns couldn’t be involved, simply that it hadn’t been proved that they were.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not one solitary fact showed that the McCanns couldn’t be involved, simply that it hadn’t been proved that they were.

What about all missing children though, should the Met be tasked with investigating them all, or only the British indigenous ones?

[faithlilly]

What about all missing children though, should the Met be tasked with investigating them all, or only the British indigenous ones?

It was you who sent it off topic with this post

 ‘So you are against taxpayers money being spent on the search for either Madeleine McCann or Ben Needham then, even if there is clear evidence that initial investigations were flawed and even if there is a chance that one or both children may still be alive?’

Please try to resist doing so in future.

[Erngath]

It was you who sent it off topic with this post

 ‘So you are against taxpayers money being spent on the search for either Madeleine McCann or Ben Needham then, even if there is clear evidence that initial investigations were flawed and even if there is a chance that one or both children may still be alive?’

Please try to resist doing so in future.

" Please try to resist doing so in future".
How very schoolmarmish of you.
Reminds me of a few dreaded ones in my past!

[Robittybob1]

It was you who sent it off topic with this post

 ‘So you are against taxpayers money being spent on the search for either Madeleine McCann or Ben Needham then, even if there is clear evidence that initial investigations were flawed and even if there is a chance that one or both children may still be alive?’

Please try to resist doing so in future.

Seems pretty much on topic to me.