The last video taken of Madeleine McCann.

[faithlilly]

Really?  You who are aux fait with Parliamo Glasgow?

I am absolutely aux fait with the Glasgow dialect but am confused at what you appear to doubt. Either that I am from North Lanarkshire or that I believe the profanity expressed on the video is delivered in a Glasgow accent. Please clarify ?

[Brietta]

I am absolutely aux fait with the Glasgow dialect but am confused at what you appear to doubt. Either that I am from North Lanarkshire or that I believe the profanity expressed on the video is delivered in a Glasgow accent. Please clarify ?

The interrogation point in your quote suggested you referred to the double positive in mine ... didn't you?

[faithlilly]

The interrogation point in your quote suggested you referred to the double positive in mine ... didn't you?

Interrogation point...bit hyperbolic.....( aye...right suggests doubt ). What do you doubt ?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Perhaps your lip reading friend will come up with the answer to the request already made regarding the failed lip synchronisation and the profanity delivered in a non Glaswegian burr.

She is not a friend, she is a co worker. She wrote what she saw. Being deaf an all she didn't quite grasp the accent!

But anyway, As I have mentioned. This video would have the word dubbed or removed for TV etc. Under communication act 2003.

[Mr Gray]

She is not a friend, she is a co worker. She wrote what she saw. Being deaf an all she didn't quite grasp the accent!

But anyway, As I have mentioned. This video would have the word dubbed or removed for TV etc. Under communication act 2003.

you can hardly see gerrys mouth never mind read his lips...so i find your claim bogus

[Miss Taken Identity]

you can hardly see gerrys mouth never mind read his lips...so i find your claim bogus

As I find the supporters excuses, hilarious. It is beyond your understanding that the actual video with sound had the sound removed for TV purposes. It is also beyond your understanding that Gerry McCann could not possibly swear in front of his children- to affirm supporters belief that they are the 'perfect'family.

We do know mummy swears don't we...I believe some supporters had wished Kate had not put in some things in her book as they just can't defend or justify it..Oh My.

[Sunny]

Does it really matter whether he was swearing or not?  I believe he was but I can't understand why some of the posters on here seem to be trying their hardest for it to be not true regardless of the facts, just like the pro bono thread. What are they worried about?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Does it really matter whether he was swearing or not?  I believe he was but I can't understand why some of the posters on here seem to be trying their hardest for it to be not true regardless of the facts, just like the pro bono thread. What are they worried about?

Why are some posters so obsessed with the fact that Gerry allegedly swore on the video in the first place?  It’s a complete nothing point which comes up over and over again, thanks to sceptics who seem to view it as something significant, but what exactly?

[Sunny]

Why are some posters so obsessed with the fact that Gerry allegedly swore on the video in the first place?  It’s a complete nothing point which comes up over and over again, thanks to sceptics who seem to view it as something significant, but what exactly?

Who gives a hoot about either Gerry swearing or the McCanns paying a retainer to CR and not being "pro bono" both are unimportant yet some spend post after post denying both facts.  That is the only reason why either are "signficant" IMO.  Both threads would have been closed pages ago if some posters would agree with facts.

Edited. Vertigo Swirl I am not talking about yourself.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Who gives a hoot about either Gerry swearing or the McCanns paying a retainer to CR and not being "pro bono" both are unimportant yet some spend post after post denying both facts.  That is the only reason why either are "signficant" IMO.  Both threads would have been closed pages ago if some posters would agree with facts.

I doubt it.  The issue of Gerry allegedly swearing comes up over and over again, regardless of anyone disputing whether or not he is swearing.  Those bringing up the subject are always of the sceptic persuasion.  It’s obviously very important to them!

[Vertigo Swirl]

I presume this was the same footage where Gerry told the cameraman to f*ck off.

^^^^first mention of the alleged swearing, by a sceptic, right near the beginning of this thread.  Why mention it, if it wasn’t considered in some way significant by the poster in question?

[Sunny]

I doubt it.  The issue of Gerry allegedly swearing comes up over and over again, regardless of anyone disputing whether or not he is swearing.  Those bringing up the subject are always of the sceptic persuasion.  It’s obviously very important to them!

You could be correct but of course it works both ways. Some posters on the supporter of the equation won't allow that he may have sworn.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You could be correct but of course it works both ways. Some posters on the supporter of the equation won't allow that he may have sworn.

There would have been no discussion about it at all if it hadn’t been brought up - again. 

[jassi]

^^^^first mention of the alleged swearing, by a sceptic, right near the beginning of this thread.  Why mention it, if it wasn’t considered in some way significant by the poster in question?

Probably just to wind supporters up & then sit back and enjoy the response 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Probably just to wind supporters up & then sit back and enjoy the response 

Absolutely right, trollish behaviour in other words.