Timeline May 3rd

[Vertigo Swirl]

Presumably In Your Opinion.

an opinion which is contradicted by numerous independent witness statements as I have demonstrated.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Fascinating!

Their timeline falls apart under scrutiny. ... (IMO)

[faithlilly]

Then please say so.  Contrary to popular opinion I don't actually enjoy deleting comments.

Delete away.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Their timeline falls apart under scrutiny. ... (IMO)

Hardly surprising when you have so many people's witness statements to try and weave together - even if you completely disregard the Tapas 9 statements it's virtually impossible to come up with a workable timeline of events from the statements of the independent witnesses which is why when challenged no one here even bothers to try.

[kizzy]

an opinion which is contradicted by numerous independent witness statements as I have demonstrated.

Yes, but it could not be worth anything or prove anything it was never tested.

It's not evidence of anything ..not even worth the paper it was written on.

Something was done by a group who had been drinking wine ..Oh, and thinking Maddie had been taking by an abductor.

So how could they think so rationally exact times?

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm









Although the entire group was at the table and starting the meal, they began the 'visits' to the children in a way that is neither coherent nor acceptable; that could not be confirmed and only the group defends it, in a sort of 'unique version'.

Although they say in the 'Autos' that their strategic position in the Tapas restaurant allowed them, the McCann, to see the apartment where they'd left their children, minor, sleeping, the exam of the local reveals it is false.

It must be noted, also, that by the stated in the 'Autos' everything points to their position at the table with their back to the apartment.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, but it could not be worth anything or prove anything it was never tested.

It's not evidence of anything ..not even worth the paper it was written on.

Something was done by a group who had been drinking wine ..Oh, and thinking Maddie had been taking by an abductor.

So how could they think so rationally exact times?

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm









Although the entire group was at the table and starting the meal, they began the 'visits' to the children in a way that is neither coherent nor acceptable; that could not be confirmed and only the group defends it, in a sort of 'unique version'.

Although they say in the 'Autos' that their strategic position in the Tapas restaurant allowed them, the McCann, to see the apartment where they'd left their children, minor, sleeping, the exam of the local reveals it is false.

It must be noted, also, that by the stated in the 'Autos' everything points to their position at the table with their back to the apartment.

I was referring to inconsistencies between independent witness statements - I guess everyone must have been drunk that night, staff and guests.

[faithlilly]

One thing absolutely stands out to me.

Not one of the tapas staff who must have been milling about around ten o’clock have said that they saw Kate raising the alarm.

[Robittybob1]

Madeleine was found missing around. 9.30. There was searching by the group. The alarm was raised, according to Gerry, at 10.13. It really isn’t that hard to get your head around.

The group did this but didn't inform Kate.  Is that how it happens?

Is this your scenario?
1.  Madeleine was found missing around. 9.30. by one member of the T9.
2.  There was searching by other members the group.
3.  The alarm was raised, according to Gerry, at 10.13. after Kate goes to the apartment on her check.

It really isn’t that hard to get your head around.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Hardly surprising when you have so many people's witness statements to try and weave together - even if you completely disregard the Tapas 9 statements it's virtually impossible to come up with a workable timeline of events from the statements of the independent witnesses which is why when challenged no one here even bothers to try.

I think people have done a fine job. I’ve learnt some new things about the events. And then what we’re left with is looking for concrete evidence. I’m yet to see any that supports rare stranger abduction.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think people have done a fine job. I’ve learnt some new things about the events. And then what we’re left with then is concrete evidence. I’m yet to see any that supports rare stranger abduction.

That’s your problem.

[Mr Gray]

I think people have done a fine job. I’ve learnt some new things about the events. And then what we’re left with then is concrete evidence. I’m yet to see any that supports rare stranger abduction.

Perhaps that's because you don't know where to look. I would say the evidence supports stranger abduction to be the most probable solution and it probably fits in well with the statistics

[faithlilly]

Perhaps that's because you don't know where to look. I would say the evidence supports stranger abduction to be the most probable solution and it probably fits in well with the statistics

The statistics say that children are in far more danger from their parents than a stranger. You know that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It’s a wonder children aren’t removed from their parents at birth and given to strangers for their own safety

[Mr Gray]

The statistics say that children are in far more danger from their parents than a stranger. You know that.

The statistics also point to stranger abduction being rare.so in the last 15 years how many stranger abductions have there been in Portugal...if Maddie was abducted would that fit in with the stats .yes it would

[G-Unit]

and must we ignore this statement as well, if we want to stick to an earlier time for the alarm to have been raised?  this guy Salcedas was only a waiter and therefore not a senior professional, nor a chef, so can we disregard his testimony? 

Referring to the day of 3rd May when Madeleine disappeared, the witness says that he was working.

At that time, at about 22.20 – 22.30 he noticed that there was only one person sitting at the group’s table, the oldest of them and he asked her jokingly whether they had left her alone.

The person in question said that the others had gone to the apartment to look for a girl who had disappeared. Seconds later Madeleine’s father appeared, greatly agitated, looking for his daughter everywhere, obviously and immediately heading towards the pool and surrounding areas.

Maybe Dianne stayed there to finish the wine?