Author Topic: Mark Warner Holidays  (Read 38257 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Mark Warner Holidays
« Reply #330 on: July 28, 2018, 08:33:15 AM »
You are right,  I heard they interviewed these staff members.  I don't know if a single interview would solve the issue, especially if they didn't have some sort of scenario to work.


SY were clutching at straws imo,they did a bit of landscaping before interviewing the three alleged burgalars,maybe they wanted to know which of them sent them on a wild goose chase.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Mark Warner Holidays
« Reply #331 on: July 28, 2018, 09:54:25 AM »
You are right,  I heard they interviewed these staff members.  I don't know if a single interview would solve the issue, especially if they didn't have some sort of scenario to work.

Why did they interview the MW staff at that stage?  What were they thinking?  I have always wondered why Emma Knights was not questioned till 2008 when she was in the apartment on the night.

The other thing I find hard to understand is no one in the MW Ocean Club employees mention Emma Knight in their statements.

Emma Knight was the Client Support Manager. She had no need to interact with the other employees except when a client complained about them, so why would they mention her name?

No-one mentioned Donna Hill either, although she was said to have been the manager of the creche staff. She was never interviewed by the PJ.

There were two companies involved at the Ocean Club. Greentrust Ltd ran the place, allocating accommodation to the various users; Mark Warner, Jonathan Markson, Thomas Cook. etc. Mark Warner provided services primarily for MW guests.

Silvia Batista, for example, worked for Greentrust and her boss was Robin Crossland. Emma Knight worked for Mark Warner and her boss was John Hill.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Mark Warner Holidays
« Reply #332 on: July 28, 2018, 09:55:47 AM »
SY were clutching at straws imo,they did a bit of landscaping before interviewing the three alleged burgalars,maybe they wanted to know which of them sent them on a wild goose chase.
That is a whole lot of guessing as far as I can see.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Mark Warner Holidays
« Reply #333 on: July 28, 2018, 10:23:18 AM »
That is a whole lot of guessing as far as I can see.

That about sums up SY. In my opinion.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2018, 11:41:33 AM by Brietta »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Mark Warner Holidays
« Reply #334 on: July 28, 2018, 10:42:22 AM »
Put it this way, if a Mark Warner employee was involved in any way would that be Warner's problem?  I don't know the answer.  I see the PJ files are broken up into employer groups does that have some validity? 

"MARK WARNER OCEAN CLUB EMPLOYEES"  so from that list we can't readily tell who their employer was.

I would tend to think if they were a Mark Warner employee they only had responsibility toward MW clients, but we can't be certain what their job description was like.

MW would not be responsible at all. The company had no legal duty to tell parents not to leave their children alone at night to go and socialise. As an employee, If I killed someone at work would that be my employers responsibility?- again unless My employer told me to...

« Last Edit: July 29, 2018, 09:08:12 PM by John »
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Mark Warner Holidays
« Reply #335 on: July 28, 2018, 12:43:53 PM »
That about sums up SY. In my opinion.
That doesn't seem likely.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.