Author Topic: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?  (Read 13783 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2018, 11:37:27 AM »
That's a mute point because had they not presented themselves for interview they would have been arrested.
Opinion... They were  not arrested ...fact

Offline G-Unit

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #16 on: August 16, 2018, 11:51:22 AM »
GA misunderstood the evidence as has been cited many times

He wasn't the only one involved in the decision to make the McCanns arguidos, so why not name them all?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #17 on: August 16, 2018, 11:58:43 AM »
He wasn't the only one involved in the decision to make the McCanns arguidos, so why not name them all?
I'm sure you are right but kizzy was quoting amaral and he's the one who has spoken in public and shown his misunderstanding

Offline jassi

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2018, 11:59:38 AM »
He wasn't the only one involved in the decision to make the McCanns arguidos, so why not name them all?

Was it the co-coordinator's decision, or that of the Prosecutor ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #19 on: August 16, 2018, 12:10:12 PM »

What you don't know is - exactly what the evidence he knows about is.

He was not a one man band.

IMO if that was the case why - are the mccanns not cleared of any involvement then.

What we know for certain is he did not understand  the important evidence.... What  does that say about his ability to reach a valid conclusion

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #20 on: August 16, 2018, 01:15:57 PM »
Was it the co-coordinator's decision, or that of the Prosecutor ?
The PJ make the immediate decision and they have 10 days to get a judge to agree.  That is how I understand how it worked.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #21 on: August 16, 2018, 01:18:32 PM »

What you don't know is - exactly what the evidence he knows about is.

He was not a one man band.

IMO if that was the case why - are the mccanns not cleared of any involvement then.

If Amaral was not a one man band who took it upon himself to defame legally innocent people ... why do you set so much store by what he says?

He was sacked from Madeleine's case by his superiors in the Policia Judiciaria so why you would think his opinion is of value ... his superiors most certainly did not.

Snip
Gonçalo Amaral, coordinator of the Judicial Police of Portimão, was dismissed this afternoon, after criticizing investigators of the English police who collaborate in investigations into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, confirmed the PUBLIC.
https://www.publico.pt/2007/10/02/sociedade/noticia/maddie-coordenador-da-pj-de-portimao-demitido-apos-criticas-a-policia-inglesa-1306369
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #22 on: August 16, 2018, 01:24:15 PM »
If Amaral was not a one man band who took it upon himself to defame legally innocent people ... why do you set so much store by what he says?

He was sacked from Madeleine's case by his superiors in the Policia Judiciaria so why you would think his opinion is of value ... his superiors most certainly did not.

Snip
Gonçalo Amaral, coordinator of the Judicial Police of Portimão, was dismissed this afternoon, after criticizing investigators of the English police who collaborate in investigations into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, confirmed the PUBLIC.
https://www.publico.pt/2007/10/02/sociedade/noticia/maddie-coordenador-da-pj-de-portimao-demitido-apos-criticas-a-policia-inglesa-1306369

Wheres the legal judgement he'd defamed anyone?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #23 on: August 16, 2018, 01:27:10 PM »
Wheres the legal judgement he'd defamed anyone?
IMO The SC judges agreed he did, but Amaral's right to free speech over ruled the right for the McCanns to a good name.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #24 on: August 16, 2018, 01:30:01 PM »
IMO The SC judges agreed he did, but Amaral's right to free speech over ruled the right for the McCanns to a good name.

I agree...

Offline barrier

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #25 on: August 16, 2018, 01:31:49 PM »
IMO The SC judges agreed he did, but Amaral's right to free speech over ruled the right for the McCanns to a good name.

So its opinion not fact then.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #26 on: August 16, 2018, 01:34:27 PM »
So its opinion not fact then.
I'm telling you what I understand they declared.  I don't agree with their findings, that is my opinion.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #27 on: August 16, 2018, 01:38:43 PM »
IMO The SC judges agreed he did, but Amaral's right to free speech over ruled the right for the McCanns to a good name.

Can you provide a cite for that?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #28 on: August 16, 2018, 01:45:02 PM »
Can you provide a cite for that?

It says Imo... So a cite really isn't required... But if you read the SC report you will see they talk of the balance between  reputation and free speech which indicates they had concern that the McCann's reputation was being affected

Offline slartibartfast

Re: What exactly are the repercussions of 'not being cleared' ?
« Reply #29 on: August 16, 2018, 01:50:18 PM »
It says Imo... So a cite really isn't required... But if you read the SC report you will see they talk of the balance between  reputation and free speech which indicates they had concern that the McCann's reputation was being affected

That isn’t the same as the SC judges defamed the McCanns which is what Rob said.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.