The time scale in which Dr Vincent Tabak had to do this crime is quite small, which makes CJ's statements very valuable as evidence as to what he saw or observed over the weekend of 17th Dec to 19th Dec 2010. But we do not know their content..
If as is reported in the media that Joanna Yeates wore a Pink Flower Patterned Top and her Jeans are Blue in the court drawings, that suggests that she had changed her clothing on the Friday evening possibliy the Saturday morning... If we say Friday, that still changes the timescale that the prosecution have said her death occurred.
The Timescale is paramount... The 1300 page document that the prosecution furnished the defence with on the 7th Oct 2011 in court, contained all the Timelines, emails, texts and phone calls of Joanna Yeates, Greg Reardon, Tanja Morson and Dr Vincent Tabak.. The defence did not have the time to cross reference these timelines to even see if his client had the window of opportunity to commit the offence.
At no time does Dr Vincent Tabak confess to this crime, not even to the pretend chaplain Brotherton whom assumed the roll as Chaplain in Long Lartin just before Dr Vincent Tabak was sent there.. Brotherton was an Ardent member of the Salvation Army and therefore didn't have to keep any talk between himself and prisoners private, it never had anything to do with him betraying the church... he betrayed himself (IMO) and personally I believe he was put in Long Lartin just for Dr Vincent Tabak. (IMO)
Going back to the 1300 page document, there are 2 searches which I believe it was impossible for Dr Vincent Tabak to have done, these are innocuous searches and were easily over looked:
On 18 Dec 2010, Tabak searched at
1.26 am- ‘BBC news’ and ‘weather forecast’
1.46 am- ‘weather forecast’
1.47 am- ‘BBC Bristol news’
At 1:26 am Dr Vincent Tabak was still at home, he was seen leaving at 1:38am on the 18th December 2010
He had gone to collect his girlfriend Tanja from the party she had been attending and he had driven to the centre of Bristol to pick her up...
This means it's IMPOSSIBLE (IMO) for Dr Vincent Tabak to have done two searches one at 1:46am and one at 1:47am on the 18th December 2010, when he was not at home to do these searches!!!
For me this revelation discredits all of the searches that they have attributed to Dr Vincent Tabak..
Not only that the defence had him in his own flat till 9:29pm on Friday 17th December 2010
The moving of a dead weight is extremely difficult, he is supposed to have moved Joanna Yeates numerous times into rooms in her flat and into his flat then into a bicycle bag/cover then his car, all without it causing him a problem.. Moving a dead weight is extremely difficult and exhausting. Statistically I do not believe that most perpertetors move their victim from the scene of crime, rather they walk/drive them to the location they are found.
Lyndsey Lennen stating in The Guardian and I quote:
A colleague went down to supervise the removal of her clothing and preserve any body fluids: "The body was frozen, so that was quite tricky." Under the media glare, the work was flat-out: clothing, swabs, suspect's clothing, all analysed and turned round in 48 hours.
So if it only took 48 hours to turn around everything and they had Dr Vincent Tabak DNA on the 31st December 2010 which they obtained in Holland, how did she manage to analylis Dr Vincent Tabak's Black Coat when he hadn't been arrested by till the 20th January 2011??? I know that they had access to all of the flats at Canygne Road, Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson had moved out..
Is she admitting to having his coat fibres from that earlier time??? (IMO) she is!!!!
So Lyndsey Lennen says 48 hours and DCI phil Jones stated it took weeks..... on the Crime Watch Program...
I'll stop there for the moment.... there is plenty of information in the main thread which casts doubt on Dr Vincent Tabak's conviction.(IMO)
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jan/17/csi-oxford-lgc-forensicshttp://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf