Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 844684 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3600 on: August 23, 2015, 08:44:38 PM »
Ding gong.

You both got it wrong. 8(0(*

no Jack got it right...then he got the next more difficult one right whose answer was 22...but that took a little longer

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3601 on: August 23, 2015, 08:47:24 PM »
I don't think wind and rain were a problem for Eddie;

The dog will locate human cadaver in water either from the bank side or when

deployed in a boat where a large area may be covered using a gridding system.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

the wind and the rain would be problem as they would dissipate the residual scent...in the case of a cadaver it would not be a problem as we are not dealing with residual scent

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3602 on: August 23, 2015, 08:51:48 PM »
no Jack got it right...then he got the next more difficult one right whose answer was 22...but that took a little longer

No dave.

Log to the base 4 of (1/8) = - 1.5.

Not -2/3.

If it helps , just try   ( log 0.125 ) / ( log 4 ) = -3/2 or -1.5.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3603 on: August 23, 2015, 08:54:19 PM »
No dave.

Log to the base 4 of (1/8) = - 1.5.

Not -2/3.

If it helps , just try   ( log 0.125 ) / ( log 4 ) ?{)(**

yes the answer was 4 and Jack got it right...is that the tenth time I've told you that

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3604 on: August 23, 2015, 08:56:30 PM »
yes the answer was 4 and Jack got it right...is that the tenth time I've told you that



but it's wrong dave.

Try it on a calculator.


THE ANSWER IS not  -2/3.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3605 on: August 23, 2015, 08:59:10 PM »
No dave.

Log to the base 4 of (1/8) = - 1.5.

Not -2/3.

If it helps , just try   ( log 0.125 ) / ( log 4 ) = -3/2 or -1.5.

yes I did that when I was about 15...nearly 50 yrs ago...so it's a bit rusty now...like my eldest son could play both those two really fiddley bits in the middle of Fur Elise when he was 10...but he couldn't play them now...

perhaps we could do 20 pages on my eldest son...more relevant really as he studied medicine at Leicester where Gerry lectured
« Last Edit: August 23, 2015, 09:04:03 PM by davel »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3606 on: August 23, 2015, 09:01:44 PM »



but it's wrong dave.

Try it on a calculator.


THE ANSWER IS not  -2/3.

oh you are confused... I misquoted the question slightly...didn't expect the Portuguese inquisition...nobody does...but the answer was x=4...and Jack worked it out

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3607 on: August 23, 2015, 09:06:05 PM »
oh you are confused... I misquoted the question slightly...didn't expect the Portuguese inquisition...nobody does...but the answer was x=4...and Jack worked it out

You didn't misquote.

You and your son got it wrong.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3608 on: August 23, 2015, 09:33:52 PM »
You didn't misquote.

You and your son got it wrong.

stop acting like a duck....the whole point is that Jack got the answer right...x=4...without doing the calculation...when I posed the question I put logx(I/8)=-2/3 instead of -3/2.....but jack worked it out

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3609 on: August 23, 2015, 09:36:44 PM »
stop acting like a duck....the whole point is that Jack got the answer right...x=4...without doing the calculation...when I posed the question I put logx(I/8)=-2/3 instead of -3/2.....but jack worked it out

9 year olds are not taught logs in schools.

It's about time you stopped telling stories.

You get caught out.

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3610 on: August 23, 2015, 09:39:25 PM »
That is a "D" in the thread title, not an "L"
It says "Amaral and the Dogs"

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3611 on: August 23, 2015, 09:39:49 PM »
9 year olds are not taught logs in schools.

It's about time you stopped telling stories.

You get caught out.

he didn't need to understand logs to find the answer

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3612 on: August 23, 2015, 09:41:53 PM »
That is a "D" in the thread title, not an "L"
It says "Amaral and the Dogs"

yes I know ..what I am pointing out is that things that might seem impossible may have a really simple explanation...I actually think that's extremely relevant

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3613 on: August 23, 2015, 09:47:09 PM »
he didn't need to understand logs to find the answer
You don't need logarithms to do 1.416...+21.25
Sometimes finding the answer is as easy as adding.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2015, 09:50:34 PM by pegasus »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3614 on: August 23, 2015, 09:49:21 PM »
You don't need logarithms to do 1.416...+21.25
It's elementary decimal addition.

at least its stopped Stephen quoting totally irrelevant chemistry for the last couple of hours