Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 845064 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5790 on: September 15, 2015, 10:09:27 PM »
I wont be explaining it again..SY agree with me...who agrees with you

Really ?

What have they found dave ?

Madeleine ?

NO.

How she has disappeared ?

NO.

So let's see what logical reasons and clear cut uneqivocal evidence of abduction there is ?

Don't bother referring to the other thread again, there is no evidence there.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2015, 10:16:20 PM by stephen25000 »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5791 on: September 15, 2015, 10:18:08 PM »
Really ?

What have they found dave ?

Madeleine ?

NO.

How she has disappeared ?

NO.

So let's see what logical reasons and clear cut uneqivocal evidence of abduction is there ?

Don't bother referring to the other thread again, there is no evidence there.

The absence of any credible explanation of anything else.

Two (possibly relevant) independent witness sightings.

Unidentified DNA from the apartment.


Offline slartibartfast

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5792 on: September 15, 2015, 11:02:58 PM »
no..there never were any human remains...Stephen was incorrect...I think Alice was  incorrect too but I lost the will to live after two posts...Lowe was definitely correct whilst amaral was incorrect...if I have remembered correctly...

You said

Quote
Lowe says that the partial profile was also a match for many of the scientists in Birmingham......So how significant was the partial match...more how insignificant was it...very

Ferryman's quote says elements not partial profile. Very different.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5793 on: September 15, 2015, 11:08:12 PM »
Lowe was a scientist
How come you bootlegged my original post?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5794 on: September 16, 2015, 07:34:20 AM »
You said

Ferryman's quote says elements not partial profile. Very different.

the sample was a soup from 3 different people and contained 15 of maddie's alleles,,,there was no way of knowing if these 15 alleles had come from one person in the group or was a contribution from all three..
you and others are making far too much of this statement and even if a few cells of maddies dna had been found in the car..so what..

« Last Edit: September 16, 2015, 07:59:08 AM by Eleanor »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5795 on: September 16, 2015, 08:18:06 AM »
the sample was a soup from 3 different people and contained 15 of maddie's alleles,,,there was no way of knowing if these 15 alleles had come from one person in the group or was a contribution from all three..
you and others are making far too much of this statement and even if a few cells of madeleine's dna had been found in the car..so what..

Precisely, secondary transfer.

Items of Madeleine's possessions or clothing transported in the vehicle and Madeleine's DNA transfers ....

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5796 on: September 16, 2015, 08:30:40 AM »
Following a shaving mishap this morning I'm sorry to report that there are human remains all over the bathroom... 8(8-))

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5797 on: September 16, 2015, 08:38:54 AM »
The absence of any credible explanation of anything else.

Two (possibly relevant) independent witness sightings.

Unidentified DNA from the apartment.

2 possibly relevant sightings ?

Absence of any other credible explanation ?

You would hardly say anything else would you ?

What about the 'Madeleine walking out of the apartment' scenario ?

Unidentified D.N.A. ?

Have all the previous occupants and cleaners of the flat been tested ?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5798 on: September 16, 2015, 08:40:49 AM »
Following a shaving mishap this morning I'm sorry to report that there are human remains all over the bathroom... 8(8-))

There is an old English joke which I could apply there Alfred, but it might be removed.  8)--))

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5799 on: September 16, 2015, 08:41:27 AM »
What about the 'Madeleine walking out of the apartment' scenario ?

Read Kate's book!

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5800 on: September 16, 2015, 08:42:30 AM »
Following a shaving mishap this morning I'm sorry to report that there are human remains all over the bathroom... 8(8-))

 *&*%£

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5801 on: September 16, 2015, 08:46:21 AM »
There is an old English joke which I could apply there Alfred, but it might be removed.  8)--))
There's something rather rude I could say about someone on here being an old English joke but it might be removed too... 8)--))

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5802 on: September 16, 2015, 08:50:13 AM »
There's something rather rude I could say about someone on here being an old English joke but it might be removed too... 8)--))



Actually you did refer to me before on here in rather unceremonious terms.

 8(0(*

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5803 on: September 16, 2015, 08:51:25 AM »
What about the 'Madeleine walking out of the apartment' scenario ?

Read Kate's book!

Ah, you mean the Mills and Boon special ?  ?{)(**

Offline Lace

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #5804 on: September 16, 2015, 08:56:39 AM »
2 possibly relevant sightings ?

Absence of any other credible explanation ?

You would hardly say anything else would you ?

What about the 'Madeleine walking out of the apartment' scenario ?

Unidentified D.N.A. ?

Have all the previous occupants and cleaners of the flat been tested ?


Didn't you know about the unidentified D.N.A Stephen?

I would imagine they would have seen if it matched any of the previous occupants and cleaners,  or they wouldn't call it 'unidentified'.