Amaral and the dogs

[stephen25000]

If those were undisputed facts the McCanns, at the very least, would have lost the libel trial, at most probable, would now be in a Portuguese jail.

They are not in jail and they won the libel trial.

Hence those are not undisputed facts.

The mccanns failed to prove many points.

Are you calling these pages from court files a fabrication ferryman  ?

Be very careful if you are.

[ferryman]

FROM THE COURT FILES.

Probably from Anne Guides, who also brought us that Alan Pike portrayed himself as a psychiatrist.

Alan Pike never did ....

[stephen25000]

Probably from Anne Guides, who also brought us that Alan Pike portrayed himself as a psychiatrist.

Alan Pike never did ....

Wrong.

So are you telling me these pages are fabricated ?

YES or NO ?

and therefore are you accusing me of supplying fabricated documents, because if you are,  be prepared to back yourself up.

[ferryman]

Wrong.

So are you telling me these pages are fabricated ?

YES or NO ?

and therefore are you accusing me of supplying fabricated documents, because if you are,  be prepared to back yourself up.

Just read the files, Stephen ....

[stephen25000]

Just read the files, Stephen ....

I have read the court documents.

Have you ?

Now are you calling these court documents FABRICATED, YES or NO ?

[ferryman]

I have read the court documents.

Have you ?

Now are you calling these court documents FABRICATED, YES or NO ?

During the searches two Police dogs were deployed and although it has been stated that no physical remains were located in the area these dogs did give indications in several areas. These areas have been subject to a separate forensic examination that is beyond the scope of this report and at the time of writing laboratory tests are being undertaken. The dogs’ handler has submitted a separate report regarding the performance of the dogs (see appendix 4). However, it must be stated any such indications without any physical evidence to support them can not have any evidential value, being unconfirmed indications. Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

Mark Harrison.

I would suggest you take up what you quote with Anne Guides ....

[stephen25000]

During the searches two Police dogs were deployed and although it has been stated that no physical remains were located in the area these dogs did give indications in several areas. These areas have been subject to a separate forensic examination that is beyond the scope of this report and at the time of writing laboratory tests are being undertaken. The dogs’ handler has submitted a separate report regarding the performance of the dogs (see appendix 4). However, it must be stated any such indications without any physical evidence to support them can not have any evidential value, being unconfirmed indications. Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

Mark Harrison.

I would suggest you take up what you quote with Anne Guides ....

IRRELEVANT.

Now the court files, FABRICATED, YES or NO ?

[slartibartfast]

The use of the expression "deluded" is insulting and should not be used. Uses will attract penalties.

[ferryman]

I repeat that if what you quote were true, the McCanns would be in jail.

At the very least, they would have lost the libel trial.

They are not in jail

They were not charged

They won the libel trial

There was no cadaver scent, 'proved' or otherwise ....

[stephen25000]

I repeat that if what you quote were true, the McCanns would be in jail.

At the very least, they would have lost the libel trial.

They are not in jail

They were not charged

They won the libel trial

There was no cadaver scent, 'proved' or otherwise ....

So you are calling the court documents fabricated.

Now back up your claim.

The documents are in black and white.

Likewise the mccanns DID NOT PROVE all their claims.

Do you think people on here and elsewhere cannot read the documents for themselves ?

You only want to read what suits your view.

[ferryman]

In fact, it doesn't even say "cadaver scent"; it says cadaver.

Whose body was found?

6. The British police dogs “Eddie” and “Keela” detected human blood and cadaver in the apartment 5A, Ocean Club [alínea AR) of the undisputed facts].

[stephen25000]

I repeat that if what you quote were true, the McCanns would be in jail.

At the very least, they would have lost the libel trial.

They are not in jail

They were not charged

They won the libel trial

There was no cadaver scent, 'proved' or otherwise ....

The mccanns were not on trial in Portugal, were they ?

They 'won' one small section of the libel trial, which is now subject to appeal.

[stephen25000]

In fact, it doesn't even say "cadaver scent"; it says cadaver.

Whose body was found?

Pathetic.

You can't back up your claim, can you ?

[ferryman]

The mccanns were not on trial in Portugal, were they ?

They 'won' one small section of the libel trial, which is now subject to appeal.

Whose body was found?

[stephen25000]

Whose body was found?

BACK UP YOUR CLAIM OR WITHDRAW IT.

However, first read the court judgement.