I would believe CJ – he is the one who heard it. Give consideration for people making mistakes, they are after all, only human.
There is a written statement that the Police have from CJ.... That all illusive second witness statement... Said statement should have accurate information as to whether it was CJ saw/ or CJ heard...
Is it relevant who found the earring? What does it prove no matter who found it. You are reading news reports, they could have simply gotten the names mixed up...
Yes it is important for a trial that the correct witness gives the correct testimony.... David and Theresa Yeates do not take the stand.... But its they on video who mention who found said earring....
Could it not be the case that both parties did this?
It indeed could be true... But therefore, what The yeates thought of Dr Vincent Tabak being evasive, would give a jury a fuller picture, They could also confirm if the man in the dock was the man they saw at the door with Tanja Morson
Yes it was REPORTED – which does not mean it was a truth – sensationalism Nine, it sells.
Indeed it does..... But unless The Yeates explain to us who they saw on the grass they talk of at canygne Road, we do not know for sure if the man in the dock is the man who was with Tanja Morson on the grass...
Does it matter who found the receipt? The fact is she was pictured on CCTV buying the pizza or whatever anyway-the receipt would have led them to Tesco...
Yes it does..... Where there finger prints on said receipt?? Why would either the Yeates or Police lie about said receipt,... If said receipt is mentioned at trial, and the wrong person is saying they found it, the picture and ideas a jury may have might change... "Please put correct witness on said stand"!!
The last footage of Joanna could not have been at the Hophouse pub considering they have footage of her in Tesco – A priest gave a statement saying he spoke to her near her home...
Why Not?? Did she go back out, turn around, at what time is the Hophouse footage of Joanna Yeates last seen on??
Maybe she was given a lift close to her home.... The preist did not know Joanna yeates so could not positively identify the woman he spoke to on that evening as Joanna yeates....
Who cares if he did not describe the clothes as “washing” it could be what he meant... He will have been upset Nine, undoubtedly.
Unset yes.... But details are important and significant no matter how small they appear to be... They can change the reflection of a Crime Scene... They may change a Juries mind... A jury may ask where all the blood was said washing... They may draw their own conclusion from Washing in neat piles, when a violent assault was supposed to have taken place...
I agree – I think Tabak is lying about this!
I think he was lying about this too... I cannot see why he would gain access to a home of a woman not happy to be on her own... She had a spy hole in which to view who was outside her door... She could have talked through the intercom
Does not mean it was the same person they heard, no evidence of it being so either... Could have been people messing around...
The screams in deed may not be connected to Joanna yeates murder... when their is no definative prove of the time of death and on which day Joanna Yeates died... Dr Vincent Tabak lies as you have pointed out... So at what time and what day did Joanna Yeates meet her fate???
How do you know this? Just because it has not been made available online does not mean it does not exist. You were not at the trial, you do not know what was raised.
No I was not at trial true... But even if they pretend it is Dr Vincent tabak car, he is not on his way to ASDA to the dispose of Joanna yeates body.... The CCTV image is from the 18th December 2010... The Crime and disposal of Joanna yeates was on the 17th December 2010
Maybe he was in a state of despair – parents tend to overreact do they not? Gregg may not have been as concerned as her father at that stage... People act differently...
It was her brother Chris who was in in state of despair... When was he informed that Joanna yeates seeing as it was around 12:00 midnight that Greg phoned them...... How could he know the day before??
Do you have a link of this? I've looked and cannot find it...
From page:
JO YEATES
24/12/2010
Our thoughts are with the family and friends and colleagues of Jo Yeates, landscape architect in our Bristol studio, whose disappearance and tragic death over the Christmas period remain a mystery.
STATEMENT FROM KEITH PAVEY, HEAD OF BDP’S BRISTOL STUDIO
"We are struggling to come to terms with the tragic and untimely death of our colleague Jo Yeates. She was a very popular member of staff and a talented and committed professional with a rewarding career in front of her. She will be sorely missed and our heartfelt thoughts go out to her parents, Teresa and David, and to her long-term partner Greg, who is an architect with BDP, also in Bristol. We are currently considering the most appropriate way of remembering Jo and will issue a further statement in due course."
http://www.bdp.com/en/latest/news/2010/Jo-Yeates/Yes she bought two, opened one and did not get to finish it... What is your point on this?
How stale was said Cider?? Why didn't said cider bottle get forensically tested, Could there be a mixture of the Killers DNA in said Cider bottle, besides Greg Reardon and Joanna yeates??
Perhaps he rang around the friends whom he thought she could have been with... He may have just rang a few of them but not every single one of them... Perhaps the news reports are wrong... who knows?
Greg had Joanna Yeates phone.... Greg could have checked who she had been in contact with... I know Greg had said phone, because when Rebecca Scott looked at the message from the Police, she immediately rang Jo's phone and Greg answered....
I do not see anything sinister in any of this or anything that would lead me to believe Tabak must be innocent. I have said before you are getting your information from news reports, you should therefore allow room for some major inconsistencies - because they are news reports, not evidence...
Inconsistences yes... But some of my information is from The Leveson Inquiry and video evidence of said people speaking.....
[attachment deleted by admin]