DCI Phil Jones at The Leveson:
Mr Philip Jones
Okay. When Vincent Tabak was interviewed, he gave "no comment" in interview. It was only a very small area around a mobile phone which he was willing to talk about. One of the topics in that interview concerned Mr Jefferies, to which he declined -- he again made no comment. Mr Jefferies was still a suspect in the investigation. There was still ongoing forensic examination work which was being undertaken. In particular, there were a pair of trainers which we found in Mr Jefferies' house which were hidden underneath a kitchen unit behind a kickboard. Those trainers had some -- had a blood spot on them. That was initially analysed and because of a sensitive forensic technique which they had to use, eventually a DNA profile was found and Mr Jefferies could be eliminated. So when the forensic lines of inquiry were completed, he was fully eliminated from the investigation, which is then when he was released from his bail without charge.
https://leveson.sayit.mysociety.org/hearing-27-march-2012/mr-philip-jonesOkay. When Vincent Tabak was interviewed, he gave "no comment" in interview. It was only a very small area around a mobile phone which he was willing to talk about. One of the topics in that interview concerned Mr Jefferies, to which he declined -- he again made no comment.This from DCI Phil Jones clearly states that Dr Vincent Tabak said nothing about CJ... He would only talk about "A" very small area around mobile phone...
Dr Vincent Tabak's tale on the stand, apologising for what he had apparently done to CJ, makes me wonder where that info came from?
CJ tells us he saw Dr Vincent Tabak, not Dr Vincent Tabak telling us he saw CJ, as for Tanja she makes NO appearance at court whatsoever, never mind taking the stand as a witness...
The burger stand... Was Dr Vincent Tabak actually identified? Could you see him clearly?
I keep saying I do not know why Tanja nor CJ were witness's at Dr Vincent Tabak's trial... It makes no sense to me...
We do not know what DCI Phil Jones means about the mobile phone, he doesn't elaborate, it would have been helpful if he did, but the omittance again of information, makes a clear picture difficult..
I have often wondered about that statement DCI Phil Jones made, I've wondered whether or not their were more than one phone, DCI Jones has commented before on TV programs about a business phone.
But did Dr Vincent Tabak have a business phone? Possibily, we do not know for a fact....
So I'll return back to the text message as it has been stated it was a text message..
"Missing you loads, I'm bored V XXX "
Now what had he responded to where they answers to questions??
* U Missed me?
Missing U loads* How's Your trip?
I'm bored* Where have you been
VXXXThe message to Dr Vincent Tabak may have been
U Missed me hows your trip where U been And his response
Missing you loads, I'm Bored, VXXXBoth messages staying within the characters allowed per message, at the time..
He could have been responding to anyone. Telling them he had been or was at the Hotel V in Amsterdam..
The context of the message is important, we have no idea really what it is response too..
Dr Vincent Tabak could have just been telling someone he 'd been staying at Hotel V in Amsterdam